


We Can’t Afford to Lose Seymour Papert
Yesterday afternoon I heard the terrible news that education technology pioneer Seymour Papert has been gravely injured in a motorbike accident. Educators from across the blogosphere have been profoundly shaken and are praying for his recovery.
There are few people, if anyone, that are as influential in education technology as Seymour Papert. A protege of famed psychologist Jean Piaget, Papert has been a leading thinker in how children learn for 40 years. He was one of the first educators to explore the learning theories of constructivism and constructionism, particularly in the context of education technology. In the 1960s, he began advocating the notion that children learn best when they get to build upon their own knowledge, gaining new skills through creating things rather than through methods such as rote memorization. Theorists such as Lev Vygotsky and John Dewey had pioneered the early work in this area, but Papert began to wonder if computers could be used as tools for students to construct their own knowledge.
In 1971, while working at the MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab he founded with Marvin Minsky, Papert co-authored a paper called 20 Things to Do With a Computer. Back then, computers were used to process data and perform complex math, but Papert had another vision: to help a child program a mechanical turtle. This work, which resulted in his development of the LOGO programming language, was a radical shift in the computing world, demonstrating that these technologies could be used as teaching tools, with students directing how they get used.
Over the years, Papert has published many groundbreaking works on learning theory and education technology, including Mindstorms and The Children’s Machine. In more recent years, he became the spirtual leader of the one-laptop-per-child movement, inspiring both the Maine middle school laptop program and MIT’s $100 laptop initiative. The $100 laptop, in fact, has been renamed the Children’s Machine in honor of his work.
Earlier this week, the 78-year-old Papert was attending a conference in Hanoi when he was hit by a motorbike while crossing the street. He sustained serious head injuries and was rushed Hanoi’s French Hospital for brain surgery. He remains in serious condition, in a medically-induced coma. The thought of Papert, of all people, sustaining permanent brain injuries is truly shattering.
Word has begun to spread around the Internet, with supporters and critics alike pulling for his recovery. Sheryl Nussbaum Beach writes:
I am so grieved. Papert was instrumental in shaping my philosophy of education and drove most of my originial thinking on how children learn. I just showed a clip tonight to Alabama teachers on project-based learning tonight that has him featured throughout. Please watch it, it is amazing. Anytime he was keynoting I went to hear him speak and I dreamed of studying under him. I work his ideas into every presentation I make. Please remember him in your thoughts or prayers.
David Rothman writes on TeleRead:
I’ve believed in the $100 laptop project despite my worries over curriculum-related matters and other issues. And to my delight, the project has defied the odds and seems on the cusp of success. Imagine what it could mean for e-books in developing countries. May Seymour Papert, too, defy the odds and enjoy a full recovery. One of the main forces behind the project, he is in a medically induced coma and feared near death after a motorbike hit him in the chest during a visit to Hanoi.
From David Warlick:
For nearly all of the 25 year’s I have been involved with educational technology, Seymour Papert was there. Mindstorms was the first book I read as part of my graduate degree.
In the UK, Marc Eisenstadt of Open University writes:
Papert was one of the strongest influences on my career - I had the great fortune to meet him a few times in my formative years as a graduate student, and the directions I pursued (especially on teaching novices programming) were a direct spinoff of his profound thinking and activities. Let’s hope, along with the numerous others writing and reading about this, that he recovers from this tragic accident, and soon.
OLPC News, which has been critical of the $100 laptop initiative, offered their solemn prayers:
May he soon regain his faculties and return to the One Laptop Per Child program. The OLPC implementation miracle needs him, now, more than ever….This is terrible news. I recently posed a number of questions to him about learning and the OLPC and had been impressed by his answers, to the point that it helped to assuage some of the fears I had about the role of the teacher in OLPC nations.
I hope he pulls through. My thoughts are with him and his family.
Like Warlick, Eisenstadt and others, I have been also been profoundly influenced by Papert. I first became familiar with his work while taking cognitive science courses with Roger Schank at Northwestern in the early 90s, and incorporated many of Papert’s ideas into my very first website, EdWeb (1994), which explored the potential of the World Wide Web as a tool for creating socially-relevant knowledge. A couple of years after creating the website, I got to meet Papert at a conference organized by one of my friends, who invited him to deliver the keynote. Here’s the story as I recalled it on my blog yesterday:
When the session was done, he had the opportunity to wander the conference and see other presenters. Instead, he wanted to go to the playroom where a group of kids were playing with toys, both high-tech and low-tech. In a matter of moments, Seymour dropped to the floor and got on his hands and needs. He then passed his time by playing with the toys while masterfully getting the kids to talk about what play means to them. I sat down against the wall, legs crossed, and watched him work his magic. I learned more about education from observing him construct legos buildings with these kids than any book I’ve ever read on epistemology.
May Seymour be blessed with a full and speedy recovery. We can’t afford to lose him. -andy
Filed under :



Responses
Seymour Paper’s interest in learning went far beyond current educational goals. Seymour and I have been carrying on a 25-year dialogue about abilities to gather, process, and value information, which lie beyond normal human capacities. We focused on the development of temporal inference abilities, the ability to create images of abstract future events, and give them influence in present decision-making. He loved this work for he understood that the future of civilization depended on achieving better levels of cognitive development universally throughout the human community.
The discussions reached far beyond simple learning from simulations and the learning to build personal simulations. They included the meta learning that came from creating then repairing simulations that did not predict correctly. And the meta-meta learning that came from building then rebuilding flawed simulation building tools and the meta-meta-meta…
The conversations stretched far into the mechanics of infant cognitive development —- specifically the negative influences on the development of inference learning abilities created by the development of experiential and transmission learning abilities that normally precedes it.
Now that Seymour lies near death, and we all “will” his recovery, I realize that he was my link to many other lines of thought. I received the benefits of your most speculative work through Seymour and you probably received mine.
If Seymour recovers he will continue to be that conduit. However, his accident now reveals the importance of that conduit. Seymour links the work of many together. No matter what happens with his recovery, the best or the worst, we should honor one of his greatest works by making explicit the web he built and maintained.
By Jack Alpert 12:03PM on 11 Dec 06
I would just like to say thank you for the wonderful comments,my uncle not only inspired you but millions of other people and of cource many children. my uncle was a very special person from a very young age. We hope that many people will enjoy his works for a very long time.Again thank you for careing. Valerie Larochelle
By valerie larochelle 4:27PM on 11 Dec 06
It’s so ironic that someone so full of imagination and life should be in such a state. I know that he’s been flown home and perhaps some miracle will allow him to recover. Whatever happens, his place is assured as a man who gave a great gift to anyone who was a child from the 70s on — to those who love them and to those who taught them.
Both my children learned computing on his Logo program with great enthusiasm. I have reveled in his constructivist ideas and they have informed not only my own child-rearing but also the way I’ve approached web projects and other parts of my work.
Most wonderful for me was the joy with which he offered these ideas, sharing them with enthusiasm and respect. I am grateful to see so many sharing memories of him and hope we’re all premature in our grief…
By Cynthia Samuels 7:12AM on 18 Dec 06
This has grieved me deeply. I am also troubled by the lack of updates. I wish MIT or someone would do at least a daily “no change in condition” post somewhere.
Papert is a great inspiration. We all pray for a full and speedy recovery.
Now, can anyone shake some news about him loose?
By Ed Darrell 9:40PM on 19 Dec 06
The MIT Media Lab has started to post updates about Seymour online. Here’s the one dated Dec 27:
Sounds like positive news….
By andy carvin 12:07PM on 29 Dec 06
Does anyone have current (September 2007) information on Papert’s recovery? Last mention I can find by Googling is Febraury 2007.
By Bob 5:13PM on 09 Sep 07
I found a site that told of his updates as of 3-11-08. www.thelearningbarn.org/
By mary cook 8:05PM on 02 Sep 09