Essential Reads

Essential Reads is your one-stop source for the top stories of the day as reported by your favorite Washington Week panelists. It's a simple way to save time and stay informed about the news you need to know. Check it out every day!

Oct 23, 2012

  • A kinder, gentler Romney

    By Doyle McManus, the Los Angeles Times

    It's a safe bet that President Obama misses the old Mitt Romney — the one who described himself as "severely conservative."

    Read more
  • Sparring over foreign policy, Obama goes on the offense

    By Peter Baker and Helene Cooper, The New York Times

    President Obama and Mitt Romney wrapped up a series of defining debates on Monday night with a bristling exchange over America’s place in the world as each sought to portray the other as an unreliable commander in chief in a dangerous era.

    Read more

Oct 22, 2012

  • 6 questions that will settle the election

    By John F. Harris and Alexander Burns, Politico

    Mitt Romney’s hopes have long hinged on the notion of a tipping point. He would clear some psychic threshold necessary to be embraced as an acceptable alternative to Barack Obama in the minds of persuadable voters, then see national public opinion swing swiftly in his favor.

    Read more
  • In campaign of memorable debates, Obama and Romney face off again

    By Sam Youngman, Reuters

    President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney face off in front of the cameras for a third and final time on Monday near the end of a presidential campaign season marked by a high number of memorable debates.

    Read more
  • Final presidential debate: What role will Iran play?

    With Martha Raddatz, ABC News

  • 2012 presidential race all tied up: NBC/WSJ poll

    By John Harwood, CNBC

    Two weeks before Election Day, President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are deadlocked at 47 percent among likely voters in the race for the White House, a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows.

    Read more
  • Monday’s debate puts focus on foreign policy clashes

    By David E. Sanger, The New York Times

    When President Obama and Mitt Romney sit down Monday night for the last of their three debates, two things should be immediately evident: there should be no pacing the stage or candidates’ getting into each other’s space, and there should be no veering into arguments over taxes.

    Read more

Oct 19, 2012

  • Why no one has been right about Libya

    By John Dickerson, Slate Magazine

    It has been more than a month since the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and no one has gotten the Libya question right. Not the president, not Mitt Romney. The most recent blunder was Romney's decision to attack President Obama during the last debate for not declaring the attacks in Benghazi "an act of terror." This has set off a heated argument about the difference between an "act of terror" and "terrorism." Conventional wisdom seems to be that the president is winning that debate—which may explain why Romney has gone quiet on Libya since he walked out of the auditorium at Hofstra University. Romney charged that Obama had not used the words "act of terror," when in fact the president clearly had in his statement from the Rose Garden on Sept. 12. But Romney’s loss wasn’t clarity’s gain. Indeed, the president is clinging to his Rose Garden transcript specifically with the intent of obfuscating his administration’s fuzzy evolution on what happened and why.

    Read more
  • For Obama and Romney, small New Hampshire could have a big impact

    By Dan Balz, The Washington Post

    New Hampshire is the smallest of the battleground states, with just four electoral votes, and for much of the fall it has seemed an afterthought to the candidates as they’ve campaigned across more prominent contested states.

    Read more
  • Political perceptions: Economics of the women’s vote

    By David Wessel, Wall Street Journal

    The presidential campaign suddenly has turned into a fight for women’s votes, as the front pages of nearly every national newspaper demonstrated this morning. (See this WSJ story.) There’s lots of speculation about whether women will vote more on economic issues, which has been the Romney camp’s view for most of the campaign, or on social issues like abortion and contraception.

    Read more
  • Obama ad hits Romney on abortion

    By Laura Meckler, Wall Street Journal

    The Obama campaign is hitting back hard in response to a Romney ad in which the GOP candidate presents himself as more moderate on abortion rights, explaining that he thinks that abortion should be legal for pregnancies resulting from rape and incest, or if life of the mother is in jeopardy.

    Read more
  • Romney receives endorsement of Orlando Sentinel

    By Jeff Zeleny, The New York Times

    Mitt Romney, who often grouses that he is simultaneously running against President Obama and the mainstream media, will be greeted upon his arrival in Florida on Friday by a headline with which he cannot quarrel: The Orlando Sentinel is endorsing him.

    Read more

Oct 18, 2012

  • Officials: Obama ready to veto a bill blocking ‘fiscal cliff’ without tax hike for rich

    By Lori Montgomery, The Washington Post

    President Obama is prepared to veto legislation to block year-end tax hikes and spending cuts, collectively known as the “fiscal cliff,” unless Republicans bow to his demand to raise tax rates for the wealthy, administration officials said.

    Read more
  • Obama and Romney campaigns battle to mobilize voters

    By Christi Parsons and Seema Mehta, the Los Angeles Times

    The 11,000 people on a soccer field at St. Petersburg College had come to hear President Obama speak. But first Max Jay-Dixon had something important to say.

    Read more
  • The four Ls and four states: what's next in the Obama-Romney duel

    By Major Garrett, National Journal

    From now until the third and final presidential debate, and quite probably even after that, President Obama and Mitt Romney will fight on the ground, over the airwaves, and in social media over the four Ls and four swing states.

    Read more from National Journal
  • Obama looks to regain edge with women voters

    By Alexis Simendinger, Real Clear Politics

    President Obama tried in his debate Tuesday night with Mitt Romney to halt any precipitous slide of women voters toward his opponent, which meant he spent loads of time pouring crack filler into his base.

    Read more
  • Who wins a tied debate?

    By Doyle McManus, the Los Angeles Times

    When two presidential candidates battle roughly to a tie in a debate, is there a winner?

    Read more

Oct 17, 2012

  • For the President, punch, punch, another punch

    By Peter Baker, The New York Times

    He waited all of 45 seconds to make clear he came not just ready for a fight but ready to pick one.

    Read more
  • When candidates attack

    By John Dickerson, Slate Magazine

    In the seal of the United States, the eagle turns its head toward its right talon, which holds an olive branch, and away from the talon holding 13 arrows. It is meant to suggest a preference for peace. The eagle that hovered between the two candidates in the second debate had the same design, but for one difference: The eagle's head was turned toward the arrows. It was a fitting symbol for the pointed and sniping contest between President Barack Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney. It was a night of barbs, interruptions, and charges and counter-charges. “Very little of what the president said is true,” said Romney. “It’s not true governor,” said Obama. “Not true. It’s not true.” During one exchange, Romney said, "You'll get your chance. I'm still speaking," as the audience in the arena seemed to gasp. At another point, the two men got so close and huffy, I thought moderator Candy Crowley might just ask them to take it outside.

    Read more
  • ANALYSIS: Who gets momentum after second debate?

    By Amy Walter and Michael Falcone, ABC News

    Like the vice presidential debate last week, the Democrat and the Republican candidate on stage last night were not so much talking to each other as they were to two different audiences.

    Read more