Amid Criticism, Border Patrol to Change Use-of-Force Policy

Senior Border Patrol Agent Kevin McCrary looks out over the Mexico-U.S. near Santa Teresa, N.M., Oct. 20, 2005. McCrary is a Border Patrol sign cutter, using centuries old tool of tracking to try and stop undocumented immigration into the US. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

Senior Border Patrol Agent Kevin McCrary looks out over the Mexico-U.S. near Santa Teresa, N.M., Oct. 20, 2005. (AP Photo/LM Otero)

September 25, 2013

Customs and Border Protection said today it plans to restructure its basic-training program and adjust its use-of-force policy in the wake of broad criticism of how its agents deal with civilians.

The policy came under scrutiny after 19 reported deaths in 2012 at the hands of Border Patrol agents. No agents have been prosecuted for the killings, leading several members of Congress to demand an investigation, which resulted in a report, released last week by the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general.

But the reforms outlined in that report were heavily redacted, as FRONTLINE reported last week.

The Border Patrol has also conducted two internal reviews that it has so far declined to release.

On Wednesday, Customs and Border Protection said the three reports made “more than 90 recommendations,” and that the agency “agreed with the spirit and concerns” in those recommendations and was “taking steps” to implement them.

Among the major changes is updating the agency’s Use of Force Policy Handbook, which was standardized in 2010, but has been under review for the past year. In its release on Wednesday, Border Patrol said that agents and officers “shall use only the force that is objectively reasonable to affect an arrest, while protecting the life of the agent, officer, or others.” It added: “Excessive force is strictly prohibited.”

Deadly force is only permittable when there is “reasonable belief that the subject “poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury” to them or another person, under the new policy.

The agency said it is working to overhaul its basic-training curriculum to help agents better deal with potentially dangerous situations, including adding several days of scenario-based use of force training. It’s building new training venues with mock border fences, and considering simulating real-life scenarios to challenge recruits.

Customs and Border Protection also said that it will begin a pilot program that uses video cameras mounted in patrol cars and or on agents’ lapels, a reform advocated by the ACLU to reduce the use of force, but one that would also protect agents from false allegations. A 2012 study of Rialto, Calif. police officers by the Police Foundation, a research group, documented twice as many incidents of use of force when officers weren’t wearing cameras.

For the past year, Customs and Border Protection has been involved in a working group with the ACLU to discuss reforms. Vicki Gaubeca, director of the Regional Center for Border Rights at the ACLU in New Mexico, has said the meetings represent some movement. But she said the reforms released today overlook accountability for agents who abuse the use-of-force policy, which she said was a major “missing piece.”

“Without a commitment to end the culture of impunity at CBP, the agency’s good first steps will lead nowhere,” she said in a statement.

The ACLU has released its own set of recommendations, which include full reporting on deaths of people in custody and clear guidelines on investigating incidents where force is used, and if necessary, taking corrective action. It plans to submit them to the White House, Customs and Border Protection and its parent department, Homeland Security.

Sarah Childress

Sarah Childress, Former Series Senior Editor, FRONTLINE

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

Mass Shootings, a Supreme Court Ruling, Bipartisan Legislation: How America Reached This Moment on Guns
FRONTLINE has been chronicling America’s dialogue on guns for years. Get the backstory on the recent news in these documentaries.
June 29, 2022
The Supreme Court Has Overturned 'Roe v. Wade.' These Documentaries Show How We Got Here.
Overriding nearly five decades of legal precedent, the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion in the U.S. These documentaries offer context on how America reached this moment.
June 24, 2022
Why the Black Educator Forced Out Over Bogus Critical Race Theory Claims Wanted to Share Her Story
ProPublica reporter Nicole Carr explains why educator Cecelia Lewis was hesitant to speak to reporters about white parents forcing her out of her job and why she ultimately decided she had to.
June 18, 2022
White Parents Rallied to Chase a Black Educator Out of Town. Then, They Followed Her to the Next One.
Cecelia Lewis was asked to apply for a Georgia school district’s first-ever administrator job devoted to diversity, equity and inclusion. A group of parents — coached by local and national anti-CRT groups — had other plans.
June 16, 2022