Court Rulings Set Parameters of WikiLeaks Suspect’s Trial

Share:

January 18, 2013
Watch WikiSecrets, FRONTLINE’s investigation into Bradley Manning, Julian Assange and the largest intelligence breach in U.S. history, and The Private Life of Bradley Manning, a profile of the early years of the young soldier now accused of leaking more than half a million classified U.S. government documents.

The motive behind the largest intelligence breach in U.S. history will be irrelevant, according to a ruling by Army Judge Col. Denise Lind in a military court in Fort Meade, Md. this week.

This week Judge Lind issued a number of rulings in the case of PFC Bradley Manning, the Army private accused of leaking more than 500,000 documents to WikiLeaks. The judge’s ruling on motive was seen as a blow for the defense who will now be prohibited from arguing that Manning may have had a moral reason for leaking the material

Judge Lind also issued a number of other rulings:

  • The defense will be allowed to argue that Manning was selective about the kind of information he chose to leak, in order to not damage national security.
  • The prosecution will be required to prove that Manning leaked the information knowing that it would fall into the hands of the ‘enemy,’ namely Al Qaeda.  “Aiding the enemy,” which could lead to a life sentence, is the most serious charge facing Private Manning.
  • The defense will not be allowed to enter into evidence reports from U.S. intelligence services that assess the damage done by the leaks.  The judge had earlier ruled that the defense could see the documents, which were discussed in a closed session of the court, but they will not be discussed during the court-martial.

Also this week, the judge heard arguments on the defense team’s motion to dismiss all charges because Manning had been denied his right to a speedy trial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and military court-martial rules.  A service member is traditionally entitled to a trial within 120 days of being charged or confined.  Manning has been detained for more than 1,000 days since being arrested.  The prosecution claims the delays have been justified, given the extraordinary nature of the case, and the need to comb through vast amounts of evidence, but Manning’s team is arguing the delay amounts to a violation of Manning’s rights.

Judge Lind said she would announce her ruling on the motion to dismiss by Feb. 26. Manning’s court-martial is scheduled to begin in June.


More Stories

U.S. ‘Virtually Never Held Anyone Accountable’ for Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan War, Former White House Official Says
A new FRONTLINE series probes mistakes behind the U.S. failure in Afghanistan — including errant raids and other military operations that repeatedly killed Afghan civilians, and for which, according to former deputy national security adviser and retired Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, ‘we virtually never held anyone accountable.’
April 11, 2023
The Fight Over the Abortion Pill Mifepristone and the Financial Impact of Abortion Access
The battle over abortion in America continues to escalate, with competing rulings from two different courts over abortion pills. FRONTLINE looks at the latest developments and the potential implications for people trying to access abortions.
April 10, 2023
What the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Could Mean for the 2024 Election, Gerrymandered Maps and Abortion
FRONTLINE takes a closer look at the potential state- and national-level ramifications of Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judicial election.
April 7, 2023
Remembering Marian Marzyński (1937-2023)
Read FRONTLINE founder David Fanning's message about the passing of filmmaker Marian Marzyński and his legacy.
April 6, 2023