Few Immigrants See Relief from Deportations In Obama Administration Review

Share:

June 7, 2012

The Obama administration has closed fewer than 2 percent of the more than 300,000 pending deportation cases it began reviewing last November, according to a new report in The New York Times.

The news comes as Obama is courting Latino voters in his re-election bid. Winning them over isn’t the problem — according to a recent poll, he leads Romney by 34 points among Latinos, a massive gap that’s actually up slightly from their support for him in 2008.

But frustration with his policies could keep those voters at home.

FRONTLINE highlighted the Latino community’s disenchantment with the Obama administration’s immigration policy in our film, Lost in Detention. The government has been pushing to deport about 400,000 people per year. The government targeted people accused of major crimes, but we found that some people who haven’t committed serious crimes were also caught up in the dragnet.

Last August, the Obama administration pledged to review backlogged immigration cases in order to halt “low priority” deportations of people with family in the U.S. and no record of criminal activity. Once they cleared a background check by the Department of Homeland Security, these cases would be closed, and the people would be free to remain in the U.S., albeit without legal immigration status.

Administration officials told the Times that thousands of cases it no longer wants to pursue have been stalled by the background checks. But it said that 9 percent of the cases should be ready to close by year’s end. Per the Times:

“This is a massive undertaking,” said one Department of Homeland Security official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the program. “At the end of the day we are going to say to more than 20,000 people: ‘We will not deport you.’ That is a very significant thing.”

Another 4,000 people have decided instead to take their cases to court in an effort to win a path to citizenship rather than stay in legal limbo.

The Times quoted one advocate who said the government’s efforts to use prosecutorial discretion in immigration cases hasn’t worked in the community she serves:

“The prosecutorial discretion policy was received with a great sense of hope,” said Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles. “We thought this was a way we can keep our families together. But at this point it feels like one more failed attempt at relief.”


Sarah Childress

Sarah Childress, Former Series Senior Editor, FRONTLINE

More Stories

U.S. ‘Virtually Never Held Anyone Accountable’ for Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan War, Former White House Official Says
A new FRONTLINE series probes mistakes behind the U.S. failure in Afghanistan — including errant raids and other military operations that repeatedly killed Afghan civilians, and for which, according to former deputy national security adviser and retired Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, ‘we virtually never held anyone accountable.’
April 11, 2023
The Fight Over the Abortion Pill Mifepristone and the Financial Impact of Abortion Access
The battle over abortion in America continues to escalate, with competing rulings from two different courts over abortion pills. FRONTLINE looks at the latest developments and the potential implications for people trying to access abortions.
April 10, 2023
What the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Could Mean for the 2024 Election, Gerrymandered Maps and Abortion
FRONTLINE takes a closer look at the potential state- and national-level ramifications of Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judicial election.
April 7, 2023
Remembering Marian Marzyński (1937-2023)
Read FRONTLINE founder David Fanning's message about the passing of filmmaker Marian Marzyński and his legacy.
April 6, 2023