Newtown Firearms Lobby Wades Into Connecticut Gun-Control Debate

Share:
Jeff Soracco of Oxford, Conn. waits to sign up to speak at a hearing of a legislative subcommittee reviewing gun laws at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford, Conn., Monday, Jan. 28, 2013. The parents of children killed in the Newtown school shooting called for better enforcement of gun laws Monday at the legislative hearing. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)

Jeff Soracco of Oxford, Conn. waits to sign up to speak at a hearing of a legislative subcommittee reviewing gun laws at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford, Conn., Monday, Jan. 28, 2013. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)

March 22, 2013

The National Shooting Sports Foundation, which represents gun manufacturers, has maintained a relatively low profile in the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings.

But today it waded further into the debate in Connecticut over firearms legislation, releasing a radio advertisement warning that current proposed gun-control legislation would only “punish” law-abiding firearms owners. (Listen to the full ad here.)

We were told we would find common ground to prevent future violence. That’s not what happened. While we await a full police report, political agendas have crept in. Now the general assembly may pass laws that do nothing to make us safer. … Banning firearms and arbitrarily restricting their features? It won’t work.

The ad comes as the governor’s Sandy Hook Advisory Commission, a 16-member panel tasked with studying gun-violence prevention, released its first report (pdf) this week with recommendations on possible legislation.

The report reads like a gun-control advocate’s wish-list: a ban on high-capacity magazines and assault rifles, limits on ammunition purchases, mandatory background checks for all guns sales, registration requirements for every firearm, and permits that can be renewed only after the user proves they can safely handle the weapon and understand current laws.

There appears to be public support for some kind of new gun-control laws. Connecticut voters support most gun-control measures by margins of 2-to-1 or more, according to a Quinnipiac University poll conducted earlier this month. A majority, 54 percent, said the Newtown shooting makes them more likely to support such measures.

But the NSSF wields considerable influence in Connecticut. Before Newtown, the NSSF helped kill two other gun bills — a ban on high-capacity magazines, and another on a micro-stamping process that would help track firearms — by arguing the laws would hurt the state economy.

Since the shooting, the NSSF has made a similar argument, pointing out that major manufacturers such as Mossberg and Sons, and Colt, might leave the state if gun-control laws are passed, taking valuable jobs with them.

Today’s advertisement represents a more public step forward by the NSSF into the general gun-rights cause, which until recently has been defended mainly by local pro-gun groups who have turned out in force at public hearings on proposed reforms.

The fate of new legislation in Connecticut remains unclear. Lawmakers have proposed more than 100 bills since Newtown, all but five of which are gun-control measures. But nothing has gained significant momentum. A bipartisan panel composed of Connecticut senators and representatives has held several hearings but has yet to back any legal measures.

As we reported in our film Newtown Divided, Connecticut historically has been and remains divided on guns. That rift hasn’t healed in the wake of Newtown.

Despite the general support for gun-control among Connecticut voters, only 45 percent of Republicans said they support stricter gun control laws, while 48 percent oppose them. More than half of Republicans also disapprove of the way the governor is handling gun policy, while a majority of Democrats and Independents approve.

There is, however, bipartisan agreement on the state legislature: 54 percent of Connecticut voters believe that their politicians won’t be able to come to any consensus on gun violence.


Sarah Childress

Sarah Childress, Series Senior Editor, FRONTLINE

Twitter:

@sarah_childress

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

A Look at Colin Powell’s Legacy, Following His Death at 84
Colin Powell, who was America’s first Black secretary of state, died Oct. 18 at age 84. FRONTLINE traced his roles in shaping the Gulf War and then the Iraq War.
October 18, 2021
Shooting Not to Kill. This Utah Case Fuels a Debate That Frustrates Police.
If there’s nothing barring officers from shooting someone in the leg or arm, it raises a question many civilians wonder about: Why don’t officers, if possible, shoot a suspect there, instead of in the chest or head? It’s a question that frustrates and annoys many in law enforcement.
October 18, 2021
PANDORA PAPERS: Video & Major Stories From Our Partners
Watch the trailer for an upcoming FRONTLINE investigation into the Pandora Papers, exposing how U.S. trusts are sheltering millions in controversial assets, and read major stories from our ICIJ partners.
October 17, 2021
Former Boeing 737 Max Pilot Pleads Not Guilty to Federal Grand Jury Indictment
Mark Forkner’s role at Boeing leading up to the crashes that killed 346 people was detailed by The New York Times and FRONTLINE in ‘Boeing’s Fatal Flaw.’
October 15, 2021