Will Massachusetts Legalize Assisted Suicide?

Share:
In this Jan. 24, 2012 photo, Terri Kroh, the director of pharmacy services at Duquesne University's Center for Pharmacy Services fills a prescription at the store in the Hill District of Pittsburgh.

In this Jan. 24, 2012 photo, Terri Kroh, the director of pharmacy services at Duquesne University's Center for Pharmacy Services fills a prescription at the store in the Hill District of Pittsburgh. (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

November 1, 2012

Massachusetts could become the third state to legalize physician-assisted suicide, if voters approve a ballot initiative on Nov. 6.

The initiative, which is similar to laws that took effect in Oregon in 1997 and Washington in 2009, would allow a physician to prescribe medication to a terminally ill adult, upon the patient’s request, that will end that person’s life. (The full text of the bill is here.)

Question 2, named for the order in which it will appear on the ballot, requires that a doctor diagnose the patient with an “incurable, irreversible disease that will, within reasonable medical judgment, cause death within six months.” The patient must make the request twice, at least 15 days apart, and be judged mentally competent to do so.

Supporters of the measure say that people who have been diagnosed with a terminal illness are already dying, and that this law would allow them to determine the conditions under which they do so. 

“A very limited number of people have the right to choose for themselves how much suffering they must endure at the end of their life,” said Steve Crawford, the communications director for the group Yes 2 Dignity. “It’s not a choice for everybody, but we believe everybody should have the right to make that choice.”

Those opposed to Question 2 argue that such a law could too easily be abused. Heirs or caregivers could pressure people into requesting and taking the medication, they say, or doctors could allow people with depression to take their lives when they might benefit instead from psychological care.

“We don’t want mistakes to cost people’s lives, which is why when we come to the question of life and death we have to be extremely careful,” said John Kelly, the director of Second Thoughts, a group of people with disabilities that opposes Question 2.

Kelly said the state instead should focus on providing better home-care support and improving palliative care, which manages chronic conditions.

The Massachusetts initiative looks to have significant support: An Oct. 11 survey from Public Policy Polling found that 56 percent (pdf) said that they would vote yes on question 2 were the election held today, an increase from a similar poll done in March, in which 43 percent (pdf) said they would support a proposal to legalize assisted suicide, while 37 percent said they would oppose it. But newer polling suggests a slimmer margin: An Oct. 30 poll by Suffolk University and WHDH-TV found 47 percent in support, and 41 percent opposed.

There have been a few unsuccessful attempts to bring the question before voters in the past. A 1992 initiative in California that would have legalized “aid in dying,” and euthanasia was defeated, as was a 1998 assisted suicide proposal in Michigan. A Maine proposal, modeled on the Oregon bill, also failed in 2000.

At the moment, 41 states have laws that prohibit people from helping others take their own lives. A 2011 national Gallup poll found that 48 percent of Americans found “assisted suicide” to be “morally wrong,” while only 45 percent found it morally acceptable.

For people looking to end their lives in states that ban the practice, assisted death still happens underground. FRONTLINE explores this shadow world, as well as the difficult legal questions surrounding the issue in The Suicide Plan, which airs Nov. 13.

Watch the preview above.


Sarah Childress

Sarah Childress, Former Series Senior Editor, FRONTLINE

More Stories

U.S. ‘Virtually Never Held Anyone Accountable’ for Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan War, Former White House Official Says
A new FRONTLINE series probes mistakes behind the U.S. failure in Afghanistan — including errant raids and other military operations that repeatedly killed Afghan civilians, and for which, according to former deputy national security adviser and retired Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, ‘we virtually never held anyone accountable.’
April 11, 2023
The Fight Over the Abortion Pill Mifepristone and the Financial Impact of Abortion Access
The battle over abortion in America continues to escalate, with competing rulings from two different courts over abortion pills. FRONTLINE looks at the latest developments and the potential implications for people trying to access abortions.
April 10, 2023
What the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Could Mean for the 2024 Election, Gerrymandered Maps and Abortion
FRONTLINE takes a closer look at the potential state- and national-level ramifications of Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judicial election.
April 7, 2023
Remembering Marian Marzyński (1937-2023)
Read FRONTLINE founder David Fanning's message about the passing of filmmaker Marian Marzyński and his legacy.
April 6, 2023