Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS

The Amazing Atomic Clock

  • By Anna Rothschild
  • Posted 11.17.11
  • NOVA

Dr. Steve Jefferts of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colorado is an expert on how we measure time. In fact, he co-developed one of the world's most accurate atomic clocks. But why do we need such accuracy? Learn why atomic clocks are so important in our everyday lives.

Close
Launch Video Running Time: 03:59

Transcript

The Amazing Atomic Clock

Narrator: Hear that? That's a second. Or is it? How do we know what a second really is?

Here's someone who should know. Steve Jefferts.

Steve Jefferts: I'm a staff physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology—NIST— in Boulder, Colorado.

Narrator: He's also an expert on how we measure time.

Jefferts: Nature provides a bunch of clocks, if you will, automatically.

Narrator: For example, the sun rising and setting marks a day. The moon waxing and waning marks a month. In the past, we measured time using these natural clocks, but then we adopted more sophisticated technology.

Jefferts: Whether it's a water drip clock, or a pendulum clock, or finally a quartz crystal oscillator.

Narrator: All these clocks have one thing in common. They measure periodic events: how long it takes for, say, a pendulum to swing back and forth, or the Earth to move around the sun. And today, we're using this same idea to build something even more accurate.

Jefferts: Now, if you want to talk about atomic clocks, we just, in some sense, go the next step.

Narrator: Atomic clocks are clocks that measure the oscillations of atoms. This is pretty complicated stuff, but the basic idea is that all atoms of a given element vibrate, or tick, the same number of times per second.

Jefferts: Cesium, for example, is at nine billion ticks in a second.

Narrator: 9,192,631,770 to be exact. And that number is pretty important since today, the international standard for what a “second” is, is based on that many vibrations, or ticks, of a cesium atom. Part of Jefferts' job is to make sure that time in the U.S. is calibrated to those ticks.

Jefferts: I simply count how many ticks the cesium atom says have gone by, and when I reach this nine billion number, that's one second.

Narrator: Unlike a normal clock, which might lose or gain a second, commercial atomic clocks are accurate to something like one second in three million years. And to calibrate U.S. time, Jefferts uses a cesium clock at NIST that is accurate to a second in almost 100 million years.

Jefferts: If you'd had two of these clocks in the Dark Ages and you kept them ticking until now, they'd be within a microsecond of each other. And a microsecond is so small that, you know, you just don't care.

Narrator: But why should we care about atomic clocks at all? Why do we need clocks this accurate?

Jefferts: If you don't have atomic clocks, a whole bunch of things that we do every day don't work. Lots of the high-speed protocols for data transmission on the Internet go away. The GPS navigational system all goes away. Cell phone towers probably quit working pretty quickly.

Narrator: Even the electric grid would stop working. Our high-speed, interconnected world works because we can synchronize different pieces of technology using accurate time. And, Jefferts says, whenever we build a better clock, engineers find some new way to use it.

Jefferts: It's sort of the field-of-dreams analogy.

Narrator: If you build it, the technology will come. So in the future, who knows where better atomic clocks might lead us? Only time will tell.

Credits

PRODUCTION CREDITS

Video short produced and edited by
Anna Rothschild
Original interview by
Randall MacLowry
Original Footage
© WGBH Educational Foundation 2011

IMAGES

(main image: atomic clock)
© WGBH Educational Foundation 2011
(clock cogs)
© wikimedia commons/SomeDriftwood
(modern water clock)
© wikimedia commons/Luna04
(Swatch_GB101)
© wikimedia commons/Luekk
(grandfather clock pendulum)
Public domain/Charles H. Henderson and John F. Woodhull, 1901

Related Links

  • Fabric: The Illusion of Time

    The Fabric of the Cosmos, Hour 2: It defines our lives, but what is time really? Have a look into its true nature.

  • Max Tegmark on Time

    Physicist Max Tegmark says that time is still one of the biggest mysteries in physics.

  • Sean Carroll on Time

    Physicist Sean Carroll says there's no such thing as past or future in the elementary laws of physics.

  • Putting Relativity to the Test

    Nearly a century after Einstein published his general theory, experiments continue to confirm its every prediction.