Tangling with Teleportation

Feb

15

Yvonne Carts-Powell

Will we ever realize the sci-fi dream of human teleportation? Physicists have already successfully teleported tiny objects. (See Beam Me Up, Schrödinger for more on the mechanics of quantum teleportation.) What will it take to extend the technique to a living, breathing human being?

Quantum teleportation is possible because of two quantum phenomena that are utterly foreign to our everyday experience: entanglement and superposition. Entanglement is the connection that links the quantum states of two particles, even when they are separated: The two particles can be described only by their joint properties.

Though there is no classical analogue for entanglement, in his book Dance of the Photons Zeilinger imagined how entanglement might work if it could be applied to a pair of ordinary dice instead of a pair of subatomic particles: “The science fiction Quantum Entanglement Generator produces pairs of entangled dice. These dice do not show any number before they are observed.” In other words, they are in a superposition of states where there is an equal chance of producing any number between one and six. “When one die is observed, it randomly chooses to show a number of dots. Then, the other distant die instantly shows the same number.”

This works no matter how far apart the dice are. They can be sitting beside each other or on opposite ends of the universe. In either case, when the particle over here is measured to be in one of many possible states, then we can infer the state of the particle over there, even though no energy, no mass, and no information travels between A and B when the first one is observed. The state of particle B simply is what it is. The difficult concept is that B’s state corresponds with the state of the measured particle A.

Entanglement is so confounding that in the early days of quantum theory, when entanglement was supported only by thought experiments and math on paper, Einstein famously derided it as “spooky action at a distance.” Today, though, entanglement has been thoroughly tested and verified. In fact, entangling particles isn’t even the hard part: For physicists, the most difficult task is maintaining the entanglement. An unexpected particle from the surrounding environment—something as insubstantial as a photon—can jostle one of the entangled particles, changing its quantum state. These interactions must be carefully controlled or else this fragile connection will be broken.

If entanglement is one gear in the quantum machinery of teleportation, the second critical gear is superposition. Remember the thought experiment about Schrödinger’s cat? A cat, a flask of poison, and a radioactive source are all placed in a sealed box. If the source decays and emits a particle, then the flask breaks and the cat dies. While the box is closed, we can’t know whether the cat is living or dead. Moreover, the cat can be considered both alive and dead until the box is opened: The cat will stay in a superposition of the two states until we look in the box and observe that the cat is either alive or dead.

Schrödinger never tried this on a real cat—in fact, he drew up the thought experiment just to demonstrate the apparently preposterous implications of quantum theory—but today scientists have demonstrated that superposition is real using systems that are increasingly large (albeit still much smaller than a cat). In 2010, a group of researchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara demonstrated superposition in a tiny mechanical resonator—like a tuning fork, it vibrates at a characteristic frequency, but just like the cat it doesn’t exist in a single position until measured. Last year, another group of researchers demonstrated quantum superposition in systems of as many as 430 atoms.

Before superposition and entanglement appear in a human-scale teleporter, if ever, they will be harnessed for multiple applications in computing. Quantum cryptography uses entanglement to encode messages and detect eavesdropping. Because observation perturbs entanglement, eavesdropping destroys information carried by entangled particles. And if two people each receive entangled particles, they can generate an entirely secure key. Quantum cryptography is an active area of research and some systems are already on the market.

Quantum mechanical superposition and entanglement could also be exploited to make faster and more powerful computers that store information in quantum states, known as “qubits,” instead of traditional electronic bits. Quantum computers could solve problems that are intractable for today’s computers. Whether it’s possible to make a working quantum computer is still in question, but roughly two dozen research groups around the world are avidly investigating methods and architectures.

So we know how to teleport one particle. But what if we want to make like Captain Kirk and teleport an entire human being?

Remember that we wouldn’t be moving Kirk’s molecules from one place to another. He would interact with a suite of previously-entangled particles, and when we read the quantum state we would destroy the complex quantum information that makes his molecules into him while instantly providing the information required to recreate his quantum state from other atoms in a distant location.

Quantum mechanics doesn’t forbid it. The rules of quantum mechanics still apply whether you’re talking about a system of two particles or human being made of 1027 atoms. “The size doesn’t matter in and of itself,” says Andrew Cleland, a physicist at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Macroscopic systems like superconductors and Bose-Einstein condensates show quantum effects while arbitrarily large.

From an engineering standpoint, though, teleporting larger objects becomes an increasingly tough problem. Cleland comments, “Taking any object and putting it in a quantum state is hard. Two is multiply hard.” Maintaining entanglement between particle requires isolating them from interactions that would break their entanglement. We don’t want Captain Kirk to end up like The Fly, so we need to keep the particles absolutely isolated.

What if we start with something simpler: Instead of teleporting a person, can we teleport a much smaller living thing—like a virus?

In 2009, Oriol Romero-Isart of the Max-Planck-Institut fur Quantenoptik in Germany and his colleagues proposed just such an experiment. Using current technology, it should be possible to demonstrate superposition in a virus, they argued. They didn’t try it, but laid out a procedure: First, store the virus in a vacuum to reduce interactions with the environment, and then cool it to its quantum ground state before pumping it with enough laser light to create a superposition of two different energy states.

This is possible in theory because some viruses can survive cold and vacuum. But humans are hot, and that thermal energy is a problem. “We have quadrillions of quantum states superimposed at the same time, dynamically changing,” says Cleland. Not only are we hot, but we interact strongly with our environment: We touch the ground, we breathe. Ironically, our need to interact with our environment, our sheer physicality, could come between us and the dream of human teleportation.

Comment

  • Mary

    Because it is elusive starting at the small and moving to the large, how about starting at the large. Experiments have shown, for example, that people’s EKGs synchronize when they sit across a room from each other for a while. Not sure if they have done it with EEGs. Surely there is subtle energy being exchanged and we have not yet detected it. For the particles, how do we know there is no energy exchange?

  • http://scienceofheroes.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/tangling-with-teleportation/ Tangling with Teleportation « The Science of Heroes

    [...] Tangling with Teleportation. Share this:TwitterStumbleUponRedditFacebookDiggPrintEmailLinkedInTumblrLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. ▶ No Responses /* 0) { jQuery('#comments').show('', change_location()); jQuery('#showcomments a .closed').css('display', 'none'); jQuery('#showcomments a .open').css('display', 'inline'); return true; } else { jQuery('#comments').hide(''); jQuery('#showcomments a .closed').css('display', 'inline'); jQuery('#showcomments a .open').css('display', 'none'); return false; } } jQuery('#showcomments a').click(function(){ if(jQuery('#comments').css('display') == 'none') { self.location.href = '#comments'; check_location(); } else { check_location('hide'); } }); function change_location() { self.location.href = '#comments'; } }); /* ]]> */ [...]

  • Pbarnes

    Yvonne
    to make this more clear could you please explain exactly what quantum states are, what has to be done to entangle them and untangle them and what the physical effects of entangling and untangling would be. For example if you had two 1 oz lead weights, what physical effect would entangling and then untangling them have? What would be the effect on living creatures, say two identical mice?

  • GVel

    Haven’t you seen THE FLY? Don’t mess with teleportation, son.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Justin-Kinser/100001508180819 Justin Kinser

    [citation needed]

    Please provide a source for this claim about EKG/heartbeat-synchronization.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Justin-Kinser/100001508180819 Justin Kinser

    Are the particles are actually in an amalgam of states, or is that simply how physicists conceive of them because the quantum states are unpredictable until an observation is made?

    If the latter, then is it possible that entangled particles are always in the same state, we just don’t know until an observation is made?

  • Ginnie Oldham

    When flip cell phones like the Motorola Razor I once had (called it my ‘beam me up Scotty phone” I told my students that as surely as we use cell phones, computers, etc. (things we saw on Star Trek) that one day people would be teleported also. Love it soooo “Beam me up Scotty”!

  • Tee Mazar

    Does simply “knowing” a location and object allow for entanglement? I’m sure we’ll never get to Alpha Centauri with an “engine” tied to our butts. But it gives me great joy “knowing” any destination is reachable. Where are the Guild Navigators when you need them?

  • Anonymous

    Questions:
    iwhy is it when observed they change ?
    What is it about the observer that makes the difference?
    Does the observe,r by some currently unknown quantum qualit,y is able to change the states?
    It seems we are looking at this phenomena, qualifing as a curious one but not making the connection as a source…

  • http://www.facebook.com/atsanders Adam T Sanders

    From everything I’ve ever read, the particles are in an “amalgam of states” or an undefined state. Their state exists as a probability function. The particles adopt a defined state after the probability wave is collapsed by observation.

    As far as the implications of this and the possible answer to your second question, you might want to read about the “Copenhagen Interpretation” on Wikipedia. :) It’s still somewhat of a debate among quantum physicists. Technically entanglement and superposition are not separate quantum phenomena but actually two sides of the same coin.

  • Lee

    I am amazed first at how entanglement sounds much like 1) a “gobo” element in a stage light fixture and that the isolation of the signature can be at least interfered with if a bat flies around between the component and the cast image, or a novice operates the fixture out of focus etc. or 2) echo, casting voice across a canyon, thus reflection is a sort. Second that our age of computer tech will likely teleport before humans ever will. 3) That the use of a virus already complicates the idea of even computers to befoul a healthy system and fourth; the thought that observation will perturb the clean function of entanglement ( much like smearing the hand on the aforementioned light lens to see better) All this commutes to me that understanding possibilities in the universe become more applied by the manipulation of everything other than human beings and probably enable the evolution of everything other than we ourselves. Of course creative wonder is limitless in the human mind and I’d like to know if ever the “hot” human can ever take in hand the limitless quantum dynamics and find use without external device or substitute.

  • Nogo87

    This is going to make my meditating on the present difficult.

  • Mary

    http://www.transitiontoparenthood.com/janelle/energy/support.htm

    You can follow the references in this summary for more development but some are quite expensive. What I mentioned is under the topic resonance/entrainment.

  • Mary

    Sartre discussed it in “The Look”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Justin-Kinser/100001508180819 Justin Kinser

    //Evidence of the ability of human systems to synchronize is clear in the following study: In 1994 and 1996, Russek and Schwartz studied pairs of subjects sitting in the same room, sitting quietly with eyes closed, not touching each other. The EKG and EEG rhythms indicated that their heart and brain rhythms synchronized, and the synchronization could be enhanced if they were connected electrically by a wire held in the left hand of one person and the right hand of the other.//

    Ah yes, the experiments done by Gary E. Schwartz, who refused to let ANY outside, independent panel examine the evidence, even after public challenges by the James Randi Educational foundation, who has a standing offer of $1Million for credible evidence for supernatural claims, yet went on to write and sell numerous books making wild claims about the existence of consciousness outside the body, based on his own experiments, in spite of them never being peer-reviewed or even verified as reproduceable.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Justin-Kinser/100001508180819 Justin Kinser

    Found it. Fortunately, James Randi has already addressed the obvious issues with it and challenged Schwartz to produce his data for study by an independent, outside panel, which he has yet to do.
    http://www.randi.org/jr/040805how.html

  • Mary

    So you believe quantum behavior exists only at the quantum level? I believe it exists at all levels.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Justin-Kinser/100001508180819 Justin Kinser

    I believe what has supporting evidence and sound reasoning behind it. What charlatans like Russek and Schwartz or Deepak Chopra are calling “quantum behavior” is a gross misrepresentation of Quantum Physics that has no actual basis in science, hence why people like Schwartz and Russek have thus far refused to let anyone actually examine their “evidence.”

    Quantum physics, by definition, only applies to subatomic bits of energy and matter. That’s what Quantum means. You can believe whatever you wish, but there’s no credible, scientific support for what you’re proposing.

  • SWHNN

    I for one, know that just because something is PRESENTLY not supported by scientic evidence does not mean that is charlatanism. The greatests scientific discoveries were made by scientists who were ridiculized, cussed, judged, persecuted and even jailed for commiting the greatest sin of all:bshaking up the prevailing scientific accepted sacred cows of the times Time proved them right when new tools of scientific measure were discovered. I opt to keep an open mind and will not call anyone a charlatan who dares to think out of the box and wants to connect the dots.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Anona-Mous/100001887272634 Anona Mous

    Nowhere do I read that a person, molecules, atoms are -transported-, in fact, just the opposite… they are disintegrated, entangled, and reintegrated at the destination (from raw materials)… meaning you’re disintegrated (DIE) at the source, and a COPY is made at the destination. I’ll take the bus.
    From the article… “Remember that we wouldn’t be moving Kirk’s molecules from one place to another. He would interact with a suite of previously-entangled particles, and when we read the quantum state we would destroy the complex quantum information that makes his molecules into him while instantly providing the information required to recreate his quantum state from other atoms in a distant location.”
    Duplicating states with entanglement and superposition is not teleportation… not subjectively, and that’s what matters with living things. And you still have to have the raw materials at the destination, to reintegrate. What happens on the disintegration side… do objects become a pile of raw material? If they’re not destroyed/transported, then you’re just cloning at the destination.
    I don’t understand the fascination with making a copy as if that was transportation. Who wants to die for the sake of their copy at a remote location?

  • Minemeister13

    I figured if you just destroy something/someone, then, wherever you want/need it, make an _exactly_ identical copy. Therefore, idealisticly, It has moved to were you need it

  • Pbarnes

    The observer has nothing to do with it. In order to observe something it has to be “illuminated” with something – photons, particles or something else. At the scale of quantum mechanics these things are large enough to change the system being observed.

  • SWHNN

    I was refering to the collapse of the wave. Eugene Wigner reformulated the “Schrödinger’s cat” thought experiment as “Wigner’s friend” and proposed that the consciousness of an observer is the demarcation line which precipitates collapse of the wave function, independent of any realist interpretation? Commonly known as “consciousness causes collapse”, this interpretation of quantum mechanics states that observation by a conscious observer is what makes the wave function collapse.

  • Pbarnes

    All of these types of interpretations of the meaning of quantum mechanics are pure speculation. Robert H. McEachern gives a good explanation of the situation in his comments and responses to my questions under the post “Debating the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics”.

  • SWHNN

    At this point all of it, ALL OF IT, are just speculations, I prefer to keep my mind open till the time when newer measurement tools are discovered. It is a waste of time to take sides with any speculations including Mr, MEachem, his explanations are based on his particular assumptions. I read them and they are not different than any other speculations. Each speculation will appeal to whom has that particular bent of mind.