• Boeing

Dark Matter 101

Jun

20

Don Lincoln

Astronomers have a pretty sweet job. They are paid to stare at the heavens and wonder. Some of their observations are pretty ordinary, but some observations are revolutionary—like the measurements of galaxy rotation that convinced astronomers that our universe is studded with invisible mass called dark matter. In this pencast, I will explain how that apparently simple observation led astronomers to such an extraordinary conclusion.

When astronomers watch rotating galaxies and compare their observations with predictions based on Newton’s laws of gravity, they find something strange. Stars near the center of galaxies are well behaved and move as expected. However stars farther from the center are rebellious. They move far faster than the laws of physics predict they should; so fast, in fact, that these galaxies shouldn’t exist: They should be ripped apart. Since we know that galaxies have existed for billions of years, this is a glaring paradox.

This conundrum nagged at scientists for over half a century. Astronomers proposed many solutions, from suggestions that our understanding of inertia is wrong to new ideas of how gravity works. But the likeliest explanation is that galaxies contain more matter than we see.

When I say “see,” I don’t mean just “seeing” with our eyes or even with the familiar telescopes that are sensitive to visual light. I mean “seeing” with any and every kind of telescope in our arsenal, including the huge antennas that pick up radio emission from the vast clouds of hydrogen that typically make up most of the mass of galaxies.

To acknowledge the fact that this proposed extra matter is invisible to our ordinary methods of detection, we call it “dark matter.” We know it’s out there, but what is it? Come back next week for more about the quest to capture traces of dark matter here on Earth.

Go Deeper
Editor's picks for further reading

American Museum of Natural History: Vera Rubin and Dark Matter
In this profile, learn how astronomer Vera Rubin's galaxy observations helped establish the presence of dark matter.

NOVA scienceNOW: The Dark Matter Mystery
In this video, explore the evidence for dark matter.

TED: Patricia Burchat sheds light on dark matter
In this talk, physicist Patricia Burchat explores dark matter and dark energy.

Comment

Tags: , , ,

  • Lann_man

    Thank you. That is a really cool way to have a difficult concept explained.

  • Carlos Maurer

    I was surprised by your graph of planet speeds around the Sun, stating that the planets at mid distance travel fastest.

    The speeds of planets I find in http://www.grandpapencil.net/projects/plansped.htm and in http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/astronomy/planets/ say simply the the closer the planet is to the Sun, the faster it goes, in contrast to what you state.

    Am I missing something that explains this?

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Don-Lincoln/100958137881 Don Lincoln

    You are correct. The closer the sun, the faster the planet. However, the graphic to which you are referrring is not of planets around the Sun, but rather stars, orbiting inside the galaxy.

    What you described applies 100%. However, in the galaxy, the stars near the center “see” the mass inside the orbit, while the stars half way out “see” more mass. Once they get outside the bulk of the galaxy, the mass that an orbiting star sees is just the mass of the galaxy.

    Thus the >>prediction<< says that once you get outside the galaxy, stars way out on the periphery should orbit slower and slower. (Exactly like what you were talking about.) However, they actually don't mover slower and slower. They move at the same speed. This disagreement between prediction and observation is at the core of the dark matter hypothesis.

    Bottom line: Your question is about a solar system, with a small star (compared to the solar system) that contains most of the mass. The graphic that bothered you is about a galaxy, which isn't small and has mass spread out everywhere. This is the fundamental difference between your solar question and the galactic graphic.

  • Michael Polidori

    A collider breaks down known particles by smashing them into one another, breaking particles into bits and pieces of matter that we really don’t understand, the particle zoo
    .
    A thought experiment… a subatomic vise could crush particles, and we have one!! Actually BILLIONS of them.. “ordinary” black holes or super massive ones
    These gravitional vises could crush matter with the same or greater force generated by colliding particles and create the zoo we currently have catalogued within the black holes. An explosion or spewing of matter or energy would release this dark matter into the universe. In the case of energy spewlation, could it “congeal” to form the elmentary particle?

    Inside a black hole my uneducated guess would be the particles are layered according to the force necessary to crush particles into their next lower size and mass
    The true building block of matter, the elementary particle, could explain the properties dark matter has (only indirectly detectable through it’s gravitional influence because of its VSS.
    Black holes, to my indoctored mind, are the logical source of new dark matter, if it is being created now… but I have more thoughts and questions

    If the universe “began” could the big bang have simply created a vast universe filled with dark matter?

    Could the universe have started out as a continguous swirl of dark matter without a big bang?

    Depending on the properties of the truly elementary particle, we would have varying hypotheses & theories about how the particles combine to form other particles, but hydrogen would be the simplest and most abundant element produced… possibly the only element that can be created from dark matter
    Hydrogen, through the creation of stars, si the source of all other atoms, matter, planets, stars and galaxies in our universe…

    The rate at which larger particles & hydrogen formed and the residual dark matter left in any galactic area or “empty” space may give us different clues about the age of the universe and where we are headed.

    Nothing I have found so far or have talked about has countered this explanation of dark matter

    Michael Polidori