• Boeing

What is Dark Matter?

Jun

27

Don Lincoln

We know dark matter is out there—but what is it?

An invisible army of black holes? A cosmic graveyard of burned-out stars? A swarm of rogue planets that roam the depths of interstellar space? While examples of objects like these have been observed, we now know that they can’t account for the enormous mass of dark matter required to explain why galaxies rotate so fast. Following Sherlock Holmes’ dictum that once you have ruled out the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, is the answer, scientists have been forced to conclude that dark matter is an entirely new form of matter, never before observed.

Here is what we think: Every galaxy is engulfed by a cloud of dark matter particles that extends far beyond that galaxy’s visible edge. Each dark matter particle is electrically neutral and has a mass tens or thousands of times that of the familiar proton. Finally, there is a lot of this dark matter. Our best estimate is that there is about five times as much dark matter as there is luminous matter, making our visible universe a thin frosting on a dark matter cake.

But physicists will need to observe dark matter first-hand before anyone should believe it is real. Our search for dark matter takes three distinct approaches: direct, indirect, and production—that is, actually making our own dark matter particles.

The search for dark matter rests on a three-legged stool, with direct, indirect and collider experiments all promising approaches to find it. Credit: Don Lincoln/Fermilab

The direct approach starts with a detector cooled to more than 459 degrees below zero Fahrenehit, so close to absolute zero that the atoms that make up the detector are nearly stationary. The detector is buried as much as a mile underground to protect it from ordinary cosmic rays, high-energy particles that are constantly bombarding the Earth. Though these detectors can’t actually “capture” a dark matter particle, should one happen to pass through and collide with the nucleus of an atom inside the detector, the detector will ring like a bell and the passage of the dark matter particle will be observed.

There are dozens of experiments underway using this approach, including one, called the DAMA (DArk MAtter) experiment, that has made a provocative finding. Scientists think that dark matter flows past the solar system like a wind, so DAMA uses the motion of the Earth around the Sun to winnow out a dark matter signal. For half a year, the Earth is moving into the dark matter wind, and for the other half, it is moving with the wind. Therefore, we expect to see an annual variation in the number of dark matter hits. This is exactly what DAMA has seen for many years now.

The problem is that other experiments which are nominally more sensitive don’t see this annual variation. This has led to considerable confusion and it will take additional work to understand if DAMA has seen the first hints of dark matter or merely an unexplained measurement artifact.

Indirect searches exploit the notion that dark matter might consist of both a matter and antimatter component. If so, occasionally a pair of matter and antimatter dark matter particles might meet and annihilate each other in a flash of gamma rays or matter/antimatter pairs that can be observed by satellites that are designed to detect gamma rays or antimatter in the cosmos. In fact, two such experiments, PAMELA and GLAST, have observed signals that could be the signature of dark matter, but could also have more prosaic explanations. Meanwhile, other experiments see no such signals.

Rather than waiting for dark matter to come to us, though, some physicists are hoping to make their own dark matter right here on Earth. Currently the only particle accelerator capable of making dark matter is the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. By exploiting Einstein’s famous equation E = mc2, we hope to convert the kinetic energy of the beams directly into dark matter. Because dark matter is electrically neutral, it would escape our detectors undetected, but upon adding up the energy contained in all the particles that we can detect, we would notice that the energy books are unbalanced and that some energy is missing.

The scientists working on two of the LHC’s detectors, the ATLAS (A Toroidal Large Apparatus) experiment and my own CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid), are now searching their data tirelessly, looking for collisions with these characteristics. The situation is evolving rapidly as the LHC delivers a torrent of particles to the detectors.

It’s a race between the three different approaches to see which one will be the first to observe a reliable signature of dark matter. No one should be the slightest bit convinced until at least two of the approaches begin to tell a consistent story. One thing is certain; with five times as much dark matter as ordinary matter, the race is on for discovery and Nobel Prize glory.

Go Deeper
Editor's picks for further reading

CERN Courier: Shedding Light on Dark Matter
In this article, learn how scientists are using the CMS instrument at the LHC to look for signs of dark matter.

NOVA scienceNOW: Dark Matter Mystery
In this video, host Neil deGrasse Tyson reports from a half mile underground in an abandoned mine, where scientists are using special detectors to look for dark matter particles.

Scientific American: Instant Egghead: Dark Matter
Scientific American editor George Musser explains dark matter in 60 seconds using a coffee cup, some crumbs, and a compact disk.

Comment

Tags: , , , , ,

  • http://loupetto.com/ Loupetto

    What about the unknown result and consequences should we make / create dark matter? I think it’s suicidal science! Until we know what we are creating. Unlike atomic bombs this one can’t be controlled the same.

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Don-Lincoln/100958137881 Don Lincoln

    Actually, of this we can be 100% certain that there is no problem. If dark matter exists, there is five times more of it than ordinary matter. In our galaxy, the ratio is even more. There is way, way more dark matter than regular matter. Our galaxy is still here. If dark matter were a danger, we wouldn’t be.

    If dark matter exists, dark matter goes through every minute of your life. Lots of it. Being afraid of dark matter is like being afraid of sunlight or air or plants. It’s around you all the time.

  • Alan Scotch

    If dark matter were a manifestation of the “many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics” what possible experiment could detect it ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many_worlds

  • Keith Pinster

    If we knew that, there would be no experimental science. That is the whole point of science. What experiment can we possibly use to detect what elements are in the middle of the sun? What experiments can we possibly use to find new plants billions of miles away? What experiment could possibly give us the weight of the earth? Sorry, but these questions are just as ridiculous as yours.

  • Fitch

    Dark matter is just an excuse for bad math based on false assumptions

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Don-Lincoln/100958137881 Don Lincoln

    What assumptions do you claim are false? Did you read the earlier dark matter blog post (last week), in which the reasons why other hypotheses were ruled out? We physicists did consider things like the theory of gravity being wrong, the laws of inertia being wrong and there being other sorts of invisible matter (black holes, etc.) We didn’t invent dark matter for fun. We were stuck with the hypothesis when all the other ideas were shown to be wrong.

    When you have ruled out the impossible, whatever is left, however improbable, is the truth….

  • http://moonbirth-godbirth.com/Thumbnails_Fractals_made_visible_01.html Ron Anderson

    “Some of their observations are pretty ordinary”.. Please take this to heart everybody. On the makeup of dark matter… Why is it anything different than ‘light’ matter that has lost enough energy to cease emitting? Why must it be any different than a match when it burns down and goes out?? Earth is dark matter but for a few remaining flickers… Isn’t it?

    As for black holes I’m not yet convinced light is a slave to gravity? Yes, some element of the space light’s emission ripples across warps as the light progresses its waveform across it. But, the fact that the wave can travel across space still only guarantees there is ‘something else’ yet to be understood that also fills that empty space and may also be distorted by nearby gravity.

    I say ‘ether’, an all encompassing ‘something’, is alive and well and yet to be viably dismissed because light emissions can rustle and ripple across its content in passing as it ‘moves across it’. If light is a waveform progressed like sound or sea waves, nothing goes anywhere more than a wavelength or so… Does it? The ‘nothing’ simply shakes to progress it… Yes?

    It is VERY easy to prove galaxies are ‘almost all’ created by stellar impacts. ‘Couldn’t possibly so, could it?’ You don’t need more astronomers or physicists with their ever more complex intellectualizations to impress each other to explain them. Just go to the Hubble Heritage site and download the best image of the Whirlpool galaxy and I will tell you how to progress. You will need a program like Adobe Photoshop and very elementary knowledge of its use.

    The Whirlpool galaxy is an offset impact between 2 stars. The great ‘spinning’ ‘spiraling’ arms are caused by no more than the changing angles of progressive impacting faces of 2 stars spewing debris sideways as they enter each other.

    If you take a look at them as a geometric problem caused by an offset impact progression into each other, you can design a simple proof by just working out the trajectories.

    They will have an opposing ‘U’ shaped debris pattern on each side of the thermonuclear supernova blast where matter directly opposing is transformed to light because it can’t move out of the way of the opposing masses fast enough.

    You can guarantee this by placing 2 laterally opposing layers of your Whirlpool galaxy image over the top of each other. Make your top layer 50% transparent. If you now have 2 opposing spirals, your galaxy was caused by an internal emission spinning outwards, as science assumes currently.

    What you will really get is an ‘impact generated hologram’ showing the progression of impacting objects across your image. You can do this with any space matter accumulation with the same result. The implication being: ALL of it was impact generated and the only black holes or other grand themes involved are still between academic ears on the topic.

    Of course, you must be an astronomer or physicist before you can discover this truth. It’s not a ‘true’ fact until one adopts it as their own discovery. And, none can discover it until it is found or stated by or otherwise tested by their peers anyway.

    Also from your Whirlpool galaxy image… If you carefully find the correct centerline, you can slide 2 halves of the image together along that plane and get a full clear expanding circle from your 2 opposing debris arms – just as you would if the 2 stars actually were the same mass colliding centrally into each other, instead of offset as most random stellar impacts must be.

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Don-Lincoln/100958137881 Don Lincoln

    Dark matter is dark not because it doesn’t emit light, but because it >>CAN’T<>NO<< electromagnetic radiation, nor does it interact with electromagnetic radiation that hits it.

    And there is zero chance that spiral galaxies are caused by two stars undergoing a glancing collision. The distances are too far and masses too large.

  • http://moonbirth-godbirth.com/Thumbnails_Fractals_made_visible_01.html Ron Anderson

    Hi Don, 2 unrelated image manipulation processes imply galaxies are impact generated.

    Both of the supplied pics use the same Hubble image of the Whirlpool galaxy and both imply this galaxy is impact generated.

    The first pic already offered simply slides half of the original image sideways to make a full debris circle of 2 opposing splayed ‘arms’. This simply can’t happen if there is a true spiral evident in the original picture. This galaxy is NOT possibly a spiraling ejection of matter. It is 2 opposing semicircular impact ejections of matter.

    The second pic makes what is a true hologram and again, instead of opposing spiral layers it shows a star transiting an exploding mass directly related to it. ‘Zero chance it implies anything else’.

    This 2nd image version is created by overlaying a second duplicated layer over itself as a polarizing filter and rotating it about the centre of the galaxy. ANY aligned rotation of it will show variations of this same event. The dominant top layer is 50% opaque. The lower layer is 75% opaque.

    This simple process will do this for ‘all’ other galaxies you try it with. Because it is truly holographic it will do it for parts of galaxies and other space debris. If the matter in the original image is a ‘shockwave impact polarized’ ejection from somewhere, laterally reversing the image over itself will ‘turn on’ that potentially pristine polarized ‘virtual impact image’ latent within the original layer. It will do so regardless of prevailing guesses about why it isn’t so.

    It will do it for most earth and moon imagery too, and will eventually guarantee the full clear process of moonbirth and continent birth were one event, when a few sleepy scientists finally manage to open an eye or two and bother to consider it.

    Again, it will do so for ‘all’ earth and moon imagery – regardless of prevailing guesses about why it isn’t so.

  • http://www.facebook.com/gwydionfrost Daniel Parker

    Just curious, but why does dark matter need to have “has a mass tens or thousands of times that of the familiar proton”. If we haven’t found it, then how do we have measurements of it..?

    I have this silly little theory concerning it. See, take normal matter. Now, over the course of billions and billions of years, apply ENTROPY. Now, as the energy to interact decreases, it becomes harder and harder to detect… but if it retains its mass and no other quality… suddenly you have remains of the universal energy that has “burnt out/condensed/cooled off”…

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Don-Lincoln/100958137881 Don Lincoln

    That’s a reasonable question. To really see the answer requires some significant math, but if you truest me to explain it in words, it’s easy to understand.

    Once you come to accepting that the laws of physics continue to work (ruling that out as an explanation), and accept that the dark matter isn’t black holes (because we’ve done that experiment and ruled it out), you’re left with the “gas cloud of invisible particles” thing.

    Once that happens, you can calculate what the universe would look like if these dark matter particles were very low mass and can calculate what the universe would look like if the particles had high mass. The low mass particles would move fast (because they have low intertia). The high mass particles move slowly. In fact, the jargon is “Hot Dark Matter (HDM)” for low mass and “Cold Dark Matter (CDM)” for that reason.

    So you can calculate a HDM universe and compare it to observations. The universe doesn’t look like that. Then you calculate a CDM universe and to the same comparison. Bingo! The universe looks like that.

    By diddly futzing around with your calculation (and incorporating information from measurements), you can come up with an allowed range of the mass of the dark matter particles that can make the observed universe.

    This is why we can make some of the statements that we do. We’ve never seen dark matter, but we’ve ruled out other options. So…now assuming DM exists…we can further restrict its allowed properties.

    ———————————

    Now, regarding your idea, matter doesn’t know that it gets old. A hydrogen atom now is just like a hydrogen atom 10 billion years ago. And “dark” just means its properties with respect to light. Dark means that if you shine a laser on it, you won’t be able to see it.

    Essentially, your idea is not consistent with data, and we can thus rule it out. The properties of atomic matter don’t change over time.

  • Jonbonz

    Daniel I like your theory. E=MC2 tells us that mater and energy is neither created or destroyed but transformed form one to the other. you may have a solution to the energy crises ! if this dark mater and energy all a round us some one needs to get on this!

  • http://www.ArvindLeoPereira.co.nr Arvind Leo Pereira

    I feel Dark matter is what god put,

  • john

    The only thing left is god

  • http://www.facebook.com/don.lincoln Don Lincoln

    There is an apocryphal story story about Laplace that is perhaps relevant here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre-Simon_Laplace#I_had_no_need_of_that_hypothesis

  • Rebbman

    Is it possible to divide up the universe into two categories, the Now and the not now? dark matter being the now, as it has no way to measure it(absolute dark and no temperature) it must be the alpha and the omega, and always now as there is no way to measure movement , mass, or anything else. the not now , our visible universe, is expanding ever faster because the now cannot interact with it, but to act as antigravity ??

  • mark fennell

    If science discovered incontrovertible evidence of the existence of a creator, intelligent design and a will behind the machinations of the universe, would it be obliged to lie about it, in order to maintain the incentivisation toward materialism? When I think about the lies that have been passed off as history since recorded time, and the frightening capacity they now possess for mediating our sense of reality and therefore our modes of behaviour and life choices, I seriously doubt that they would risk an outbreak of mental health and sanity which would affect revenue streams and such, and the scientific discovery of the truth about our existence and our relationship with God could easily create a new religious surge and forging of identity around a common belief, which would be disastrous for the monied elites of the Western world. Are you lying to us, brother?

  • http://www.facebook.com/Dr.Don.Lincoln Don Lincoln

    What binds together scientists is the quest for truth. If that leads us in the direction of burning bushes and arks, so be it. However the data hasn’t lead us that way. The simple fact is that the data is quite inconsistent with many religious worldviews. Sadly for some, many religious claims have been utterly debunked. This doesn’t mean that God is Dead as Nietzche claimed. But religion as an accurate description of the universe is very clearly on life support. As a way for people to psychologically cope with the uncertainties of life, it still thrives.

    People somehow project their own way of thinking onto scientists, thinking that the scientific worldview is some kind of global conspiracy. This is utterly silly. The scientific world is a hyper-competitive search for truth, no matter what it is.
    Truth is all that matters.