A joint investigation withProPublica

Why Isn’t Pakistan Prosecuting Mumbai Suspects?

by
A Perfect Terrorist, a FRONTLINE and ProPublica investigation into the mysterious circumstances behind David Headley’s rise from heroin dealer and U.S. government informant to plotter of the 2008 attack on Mumbai, airs again tonight on PBS. Check your local listings or watch it online.

It’s been more than three years since the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks — a slaughter carried out by Pakistan-based terrorist group Lashkar-i-Taiba that left 166 dead, including six Americans — but there is little to show that its masterminds in Pakistan are being held accountable.

To date, Pakistan has yet to prosecute many of the high-level Lashkar leaders suspected of involvement in attacks, including Sajid Mir, the alleged handler of David Coleman Headley, the American who scouted targets for the Mumbai attacks and whom we investigated in our November report, A Perfect Terrorist, which airs again on PBS this evening.

Though Pakistan has taken some measures to investigate and act against alleged perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks, critics are doubtful they will result in any meaningful action in the near term:

  • Under foreign pressure, Pakistan arrested Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, Lashkar’s powerful military leader, shortly after the attacks; he still awaits trial. In November, we reported that U.S. officials raised concerns that Lakhvi was directing operations while in Pakistani custody, and that Army Chief Ashfaq Parvez Kayani had rejected a U.S. request that authorities seize the cell phone Lakhvi was using while in custody.
  • Hafiz Saeed, Lashkar’s spiritual leader, was placed under house arrest shortly after the Mumbai attacks, only to be released later due to lack of evidence. Critics say Saeed continues to operate with a great deal of impunity; in mid-December, he addressed a rally of 30,000 Islamists in Lahore, where he extolled the virtues of jihad and protested the errant NATO airstrikes that killed 26 Pakistani soldiers in November.

“Lashkar is considered so powerful at a political, military and public opinion level in Pakistan that there’s real fear that if the government moves against [the group], it has all these armed operatives and graduates who will then turn against the government,” says FRONTLINE correspondent and ProPublica reporter Sebastian Rotella.

Rotella also notes that the current disastrous relations between the U.S. and Pakistan have stalled American efforts to prosecute four alleged Mumbai masterminds indicted in Chicago last year. “The relationship with the United States is so bad that Pakistan is basically [saying] ‘We’re not going to do anything the Americans tell us, and that definitely includes messing with Lashkar, which is our number one militant asset,’” he explains.

But in the chaos following the May 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden, Pakistan’s civilian government appeared willing to do just that — at least according to a controversial memo purportedly authored by the former Pakistani ambassador to the U.S. In exchange for American assistance in helping to prevent a military coup, the memo said Pakistan’s civilian government was willing to “cooperate fully” with the Indian government on:

bringing all perpetrators of Pakistani origin to account for the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, whether outside the government or inside any part of the government, including its intelligence agencies. This includes handing over those against whom sufficient evidence exists of guilt to the Indian security services.

But the fallout from the release of the memo — which is now the subject of a scandalous inquiry that has pitted Pakistan’s civilian and military powers against each other — makes it even less likely that the country will crack down on the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks.

The military “thinks Pakistan has too many problems, and shouldn’t risk a rupture with the Lashkar-i-Taiba,” explains Praveen Swami, the New Delhi bureau chief of the The Hindu.

Beyond holding Lashkar accountable for the Mumbai attacks, Swami and others are concerned about the group’s potential to carry out another attack in India — and the ensuing consequences.

“The big worry is what happens if there is another big strike heading into the next Indian general elections, which are two years away,” Swami told FRONTLINE. “It will be very difficult to show the kind of restraint they demonstrated after [Mumbai].”

Explore the Site

Did the U.S. Know More than It Let On about Mumbai Attacks Suspect?: U.S. Officials say David Coleman Headley slipped through the cracks, but ex-wives and Indian authorities say the government had information about the his activities before the 2008 siege that killed 166 people. ProPublica reporter and FRONTLINE correspondent Sebastian Rotella uncovers new details that underscore suspicions — especially in India — that the U.S. knows more than it has disclosed.

Slideshow: An American’s Path to the Mumbai Attacks: David Coleman Headley isn’t a household name in the United States. But he’s as well known to Indians as Osama bin Laden is to Americans. Through these exclusive photos, explore how Headley, born Daood Gilani in the U.S., followed a path that led to the 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai — and a plea bargain that both saved his life and put his best friend behind bars.

Building and Re-Building the Chabad House: A chronicle of what happened at the Jewish community center targeted by the Mumbai terrorists, and how family members of those killed are moving forward.

Could this Man’s Warnings Have Prevented the Mumbai Attacks?: For years, renowned French investigative judge Jean-Louis Bruguière had warned of Lashkar-i-Taiba’s evolving international ambitions. One year before Mumbai, he successfully convicted a French citizen who had been deployed by Lashkar on an international mission.

blog comments powered by Disqus

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

SUPPORT PROVIDED BY

FRONTLINE on

ShopPBS
Frontline Journalism Fund

Supporting Investigative Reporting

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Major funding for FRONTLINE is provided by The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Additional funding is provided by the Park Foundation, the Wyncote Foundation, and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation.PBSPark FoundationMacArthur FoundationwyncoteCPB

FRONTLINE   Watch FRONTLINE   About FRONTLINE   Contact FRONTLINE
Privacy Policy   Journalistic Guidelines   PBS Privacy Policy   PBS Terms of Use   Corporate Sponsorship
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2014 WGBH Educational Foundation
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.