SEC Nominee Signals Cautious Approach to Prosecuting Banks

Share:
Surrounded by her investigative team,MaryJoWhite, an investigator looking into sexual misconduct allegations against Albany Bishop Howard Hubbard, announces the results of her investigation during a news conference in Albany, N.Y. Thursday, June 24, 2004. White said she found no credible evidence to support allegations against the bishop.

Mary Jo White, President Obama's nominee to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, appears at a 2004 news conference. (AP Photo/Tim Roske)

March 13, 2013
Watch The Untouchables, FRONTLINE’s look at why no Wall Street executives have been prosecuted for fraud in connection with the financial crisis.

President Obama’s pick to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission told senators at a confirmation hearing Tuesday that federal prosecutors should consider the “collateral consequences” of bringing a criminal indictment against financial institutions.

The comment by Mary Jo White, a former U.S. attorney herself, comes less than a week after Attorney General Eric Holder told lawmakers that the Justice Department has considered the impact to the broader economy of prosecuting major banks for the financial crisis. The size of some institutions, Holder said, “has an inhibiting impact” on the department’s ability to bring certain cases.

The attorney general’s comments were put to White during an exchange with Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.). Asked to respond to Holder’s statement, White told the Senate Banking Committee that federal prosecutors are instructed by Justice Department policy to consider the “collateral consequences of a criminal indictment to innocent shareholders, employees, or the public.”  And while no institution should be considered “too big to charge,” she said, “certainly, prosecutors should consider that before proceeding.”

White’s remarks echoed similar comments made by Lanny Breuer — who led bank enforcement during his tenure as assistant attorney general — in an interview with correspondent Martin Smith for the FRONTLINE film The Untouchables. Breuer’s interview (which you can read here) prompted a Jan. 29 letter from Senators Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) seeking an explanation from the Justice Department about how it determines which cases to prosecute.

If confirmed, White would not have the authority to bring criminal charges. She told lawmakers, however, that as a former United States attorney in Manhattan from 1993 to 2002, she spoke with Treasury Department officials on at least one occasion when considering whether to bring charges against a financial firm. Those consultations, she said, addressed not just the possible fallout of a case for the U.S. economy, but global markets as well.

“Essentially, I was seeking information based on an argument that had been made by the lawyers for the institution that I ultimately indicted, as to whether an indictment of that institution would result in great damage to either the Japanese economy or the world economy,” explained White. “And the answer I got back is that I should proceed to make my own decision, which I took to mean that it would likely not have that impact.”

The SEC does not consider collateral consequences in its charging decisions, White said, “But they do consider consequences in their remedies.” She signaled such considerations could factor into decisions over civil penalties.

White also addressed concerns about her work since leaving her post as a U.S. Attorney. She has since worked as a partner for the law firm Debevoise and Plimpton, where she has represented clients such as JPMorgan Chase and former Bank of America CEO Kenneth Lewis.

Seeking to ease those concerns, White said her work for Wall Street clients “does not change me as a person. It doesn’t mean I embrace the policy thoughts of any of my clients. … The American public will be my client, and I will work as zealously as is possible on behalf of them. “


Jason M. Breslow

Jason M. Breslow, Former Digital Editor

Twitter:

@jbrezlow

More Stories

9/11, More Than 20 Years Later: 20 Essential Documentaries to Watch
These films, selected from more than two decades of extensive FRONTLINE reporting, probe that fateful day and its lasting impacts on America and the world.
September 5, 2025
Watch FRONTLINE’s 5 Most-Streamed Documentaries of 2025 (So Far)
Looking for some documentaries to watch as summer continues? We’ve got you covered.
August 6, 2025
Tonight's New Documentary, This Month, and the Future
A note from FRONTLINE Editor-in-Chief and Executive Producer Raney Aronson-Rath.
July 29, 2025
The Iran-Israel Conflict and the U.S. Role: 11 Documentaries to Watch
Decades of tensions between Israel and Iran erupted into war in June. These FRONTLINE films offer context and background on the conflict, both countries’ leaders and ambitions, the role of the U.S., and the ongoing impact across the Middle East.
July 29, 2025