The Plea(10:50) What are the implications of a system that relies on pleas to expedite justice?
Cleared by DNA, Texas Man Still Fighting to Clear His Name
Follow @GretchenMargApril 2, 2012, 2:32 pm ET
The last time FRONTLINE viewers saw Kerry Max Cook was 2004. He was living in Texas with his wife and young son. Idyllic, maybe, compared with the two decades he spent in prison, mostly on death row, after being twice convicted of murdering 21-year-old Linda Jo Evans in 1977.
Today Cook, who has always maintained his innocence, is still living in Texas with his wife and son. Little has changed. And that, says Cook, is the problem.
Cook’s case is one of the most complex and controversial in Texas history; the video above from our film The Plea unravels the years of legal twists and turns. Both of his convictions were eventually overturned by Texas courts. In the end, almost all the evidence against Cook — from witness testimony to forensic evidence — crumbled, prompting an overturned conviction and a scathing 1996 critique by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that admonished the conduct of both the police and prosecution going back to his first trial in 1978.
Faced with a fourth trial in 1999 with almost no usable evidence, the state of Texas took an unusual tact: It offered Cook the option of taking a “no contest” plea. It’s a strange legal position the Supreme Court opened the door to in 1970 — the argument is that the Constitution allows for a defendant to make a deal and plead guilty, while still maintaining his innocence.
“The important thing for us was to insure that he got a conviction for murder that would follow him for the rest of his life,” then-first assistant District Attorney David Dobbs, who prosecuted the second two trials, told FRONTLINE.
Cook took the plea. Two months later, DNA testing of semen found at the scene excluded him.
More than a decade later, Dobbs’ words ring true, evidenced by Texas Monthly senior editor Michael Hall’s recent update on Cook’s life now.
He’s still living in a perpetually liminal state: while Cook has never admitted guilt, he’s a convicted murderer in the eyes of Texas law. And this affects his daily life, he tells Hall:
And he says he still suffers from “nightmares and suicidal urges” due to his incarceration.
Cook and his lawyer Marc McPeak recently embarked on a new legal strategy to clear his name — a motion to perform DNA tests on other physical evidence found at the murder scene. McPeak also filed a motion to recuse the judge who would hear the DNA-testing motion — in yet another twist, the judge is Jack Skeen, the former district attorney who prosecuted Cook’s first two trials.
The goal, writes Michael Hall, is for Cook to be further excluded as a suspect, after which his lawyer can file a writ of habeas corpus to ask that Cook be found innocent in the eyes of the law.
Update [April 10, 2012]: A Texas judge yesterday granted Kerry Max Cook’s request for DNA testing on other items found at the crime scene, but ruled that the case will stay in Smith County.
Photo: Kerry Max Cook with his mother Evelyn at his side speaks to the media after he was released from the Smith County Jail in Tyler, Texas, Tuesday Nov. 11, 1997. Cook, a former Texas death row inmate, had been jailed pending his fourth trial for capital murder. (AP Photo/Ron Heflin)
SUPPORT PROVIDED BY
NEXT ON FRONTLINEOutbreakMay 5th
FRONTLINE Watch FRONTLINE
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2015 WGBH Educational Foundation
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.