Justice Dept. Sues North Carolina Over New Voter Law

by

The Justice Department said it would sue North Carolina today over its new voting law, following a similar suit it filed against Texas last month objecting to its voter ID law.

In June, the Supreme Court overturned a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, which required states with a history of discrimination to submit voting law changes for clearance by the federal government. Under that provision, the government preemptively blocked changes that it deemed discriminatory without having to fight costly, time-consuming battles in court.

States who challenged the law before the Supreme Court argued that they no longer discriminated against voters and didn’t need to preclear their changes.

Hours after that decision, five of the nine covered states introduced new voting laws, some of which had previously been deemed discriminatory. North Carolina followed with its own law in August. Attorney General Eric Holder vowed to challenge voting laws that discriminated against minorities.

In the suits against Texas and now North Carolina, Holder is also arguing that because of their history of discrimination, the states should also be brought back under the preclearance requirement.

In North Carolina, the government is challenging restrictions in the new law that Holder described as “troubling,” including a reduction in the days available for early voting, when minorities are more likely to cast ballots; a photo identification requirement; and a ban on the counting of provisional ballots that are accidentally cast in the wrong precinct.

“By restricting access and ease of voter participation, this new law would shrink, rather than expand, access to the franchise,” Holder told reporters on Monday. North Carolina saw record turnout among African-American voters in the 2008 and the 2012 general elections, Holder said, adding that more than 70 percent of black voters cast ballots during the early voting period.

North Carolina legislators who backed the law said they wanted to curb voter fraud.

“While some will try to make this seem to be controversial, the simple reality is that requiring voters to provide a photo ID when they vote is a common sense idea,” said Gov. Pat McCrory, when he signed the bill last month. “This new law brings our state in line with a healthy majority of other states throughout the country. This common sense safeguard is common-place.”

The North Carolina’s attorney general office said it would release a statement later today.

The federal government isn’t the only one wading into the fight. A few weeks after the Supreme Court decision, other lawsuits began to crop up, with the aim of challenging laws before this year’s November elections and the 2014 midterm election.

Several civil rights groups have also sued Texas, and the American Civil Liberties Union has filed suit on behalf of several Pennsylvania voters who don’t have a valid ID card, and aren’t able to obtain one. Last month, a judge ruled that the Pennsylvania law couldn’t take effect until a verdict was reached, so it won’t be imposed for the November elections.

In August, the ACLU and the Southern Coalition for Social Justice also filed a suit challenging North Carolina’s new changes.

Aida Castillo places a sticker on her blouse indicating that she had voted during the early voting period, Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)
blog comments powered by Disqus

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

SUPPORT PROVIDED BY

FRONTLINE on

ShopPBS
Frontline Journalism Fund

Supporting Investigative Reporting

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Major funding for FRONTLINE is provided by The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Additional funding is provided by the Park Foundation, The Ford Foundation, the Wyncote Foundation, and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation.
PBSCPBMacArthur FoundationPark FoundationFord Foundationwyncote

FRONTLINE   Watch FRONTLINE   About FRONTLINE   Contact FRONTLINE
Privacy Policy   Journalistic Guidelines   PBS Privacy Policy   PBS Terms of Use   Corporate Sponsorship
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2014 WGBH Educational Foundation
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.