Justice Dept. to Sue Texas Over Voter ID Law

by

The federal government waded further into the fight over voting-rights laws on Thursday, when the Justice Department announced it would file a new lawsuit against Texas to block its voter ID law on the grounds that it discriminates against minority voters.

The U.S. also said it would seek a new ruling declaring Texas’ contested 2011 redistricting plans are discriminatory in a separate filing.

Last month Attorney General Eric Holder warned that the government would fight to defend against infringements on voting rights, in the wake of June’s landmark Supreme Court decision overturning a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. That provision, Section 5, required Texas and eight other states to pre-clear all voting changes with the federal government.

“Today’s action marks another step forward in the Justice Department’s continuing effort to protect the voting rights of all eligible Americans,” said Attorney General Eric Holder. “We will not allow the Supreme Court’s recent decision to be interpreted as open season for states to pursue measures that suppress voting rights.

In the voter ID filing, the government is also seeking to bail Texas back under that pre-clearance requirement because of its history of discrimination.

A D.C. federal court already ruled that both the voter ID law and the redistricting maps were discriminatory under Section 5. Texas appealed both of those decisions to the Supreme Court. In June, after Supreme Court overturned Section 5, it vacated the two federal court rulings, effectively allowing both to move forward.

After the Shelby ruling, Gov. Rick Perry announced that Texas would implement its voter ID law immediately. It chose to use other redistricting maps, however, after a voting-rights group, the Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund, filed an injunction to block the 2011 set.

“Eric Holder’s outrageous claim that voter ID is a racist plot to disenfranchise minority voters is gutter politics and is offensive to the overwhelming majority of Texans of all races who support this ballot integrity measure,” said Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott in a statement on Thursday.

In the past, Abbott has pointed to the fact that the Supreme Court had vacated the previous court rulings on Texas’ policies as evidence that the state did not seek to discriminate against minority voters.

Texas isn’t the only state moving ahead with new voting laws in the wake of Shelby. Within 24 hours of the Supreme Court’s decision, four other states — Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama and South Carolina — announced decisions to move ahead with laws, some of which the Justice Department had already blocked as discriminatory.

North Carolina, which was covered in part under Section 5, has passed a spate of laws, cutting back early voting, banning extended polling hours and further restricting acceptable IDs required at the polls. Florida, which was also partly covered and fought a battle with the Justice Department last election over purging Latino voters from its rolls, plans to restart those efforts.

A voter shows ID in Virginia. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
blog comments powered by Disqus

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

SUPPORT PROVIDED BY

NEXT ON FRONTLINE

Solitary NationApril 22nd

FRONTLINE on

ShopPBS
Frontline Journalism Fund

Supporting Investigative Reporting

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Major funding for FRONTLINE is provided by The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Additional funding is provided by the Park Foundation, the Wyncote Foundation, and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation.PBSPark FoundationMacArthur FoundationwyncoteCPB

FRONTLINE   Watch FRONTLINE   About FRONTLINE   Contact FRONTLINE
Privacy Policy   Journalistic Guidelines   PBS Privacy Policy   PBS Terms of Use   Corporate Sponsorship
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2014 WGBH Educational Foundation
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.