NRC Licenses First New Nuclear Reactors in Decades

by

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved two new reactors yesterday, paving the way for new nuclear technology amidst concerns over an aging U.S. fleet.

But the approval, after a 4-1 vote by the NRC, is not without a touch of controversy. NRC Chair Gregory Jaczko was the one dissenting vote, citing concerns about post-Fukushima safety.

The two reactors, both in Georgia at the current site of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, will be the first built since 1978; currently, about half of U.S. nuclear reactors are more than 30 years old. And the type of plant, the Westinghouse AP1000, is a new design set to withstand “earthquakes and plane crashes and to be less vulnerable to a cutoff of electricity, which set off the triple meltdown at Fukushima in 2011.” China is also building AP1000s, the first of which expected to go online in 2013.

While Southern Nuclear Operating Co. President Thomas Fanning called the vote a “monumental accomplishment” (Southern owns Votgle), Chairman Jaczko voiced his reservations about building new plants before any post-Fukushima safety changes have been made to existing ones.

“Right now we know there are things that need to be fixed, things that need to be changed, or at least things that need to be analyzed,” Jaczko told Bloomberg. “For us to issue this license, and say ‘we’ll deal with them later,’ to me is kind of putting the cart before the horse.”

For example, 27 reactors don’t meet seismic guidelines set by the NRC in the ’90s. There are also risks related to fire and equipment failures that critics, like the Union of Concerned Scientists’ David Lochbaum, say are being handled inconsistently by the NRC.

For more on these issues, watch our recent film Nuclear Aftershocks, which looks at the implications of the Fukushima disaster on U.S. nuclear safety.

Photo: A PR photo of the Westinghouse AP1000 (AP/PRNewsFoto/Westinghouse Electric Company)
blog comments powered by Disqus

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

SUPPORT PROVIDED BY

RECENT STORIES

FRONTLINE on

ShopPBS
Frontline Journalism Fund

Supporting Investigative Reporting

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Major funding for FRONTLINE is provided by John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Additional funding is provided by the Park Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Wyncote Foundation, and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation.
PBSCPBMacArthur FoundationPark FoundationFord Foundationwyncote

FRONTLINE   Watch FRONTLINE   About FRONTLINE   Contact FRONTLINE
Privacy Policy   Journalistic Guidelines   PBS Privacy Policy   PBS Terms of Use   Corporate Sponsorship
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2014 WGBH Educational Foundation
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.