How Will the NCAA Punish Miami?


This week’s sports bombshell comes at the hands of Yahoo! Sports reporter Charles Robinson, who’s published a damning investigation into illegal benefits given to University of Miami athletes by former booster Nevin Shapiro. Shapiro, who is currently in jail for his involvement in a  $930 million Ponzi scheme, came forward with his story about a year ago. The piece is well worth a close read.

While it’s clear that Shapiro’s actions — which include providing athletes with “cash, prostitutes, entertainment in his multimillion-dollar homes and yacht, paid trips to high-end restaurants and nightclubs, jewelry, bounties for on-field play (including bounties for injuring opposing players), travel and, on one occasion, an abortion” — were wildly illegal according to the NCAA rulebook, one Sports Illustrated writer offers an interesting argument about amateurism and the league’s next steps in the matter.

Michael Rosenberg suggests the NCAA won’t hand down the “death penalty” — temporarily shutting down Miami’s football program — in part because it makes them too much money. His theory:

The NCAA can’t reach too far to enforce its rules, because then the whole system could collapse. Shutting down the Miami program would severely weaken the Atlantic Coast Conference, one of the six power conferences that control the Bowl Championship Series. The ACC needs its best programs to compete and, just as crucially, appear on television. Networks don’t pay rights fees to show the death penalty. To sum up: The NCAA is upset that Miami players took whatever cash they could grab, but the NCAA won’t punish Miami too severely because its member schools want whatever cash they can grab.

Of course, we’re just at the beginning stages of what’s bound to be a messy few weeks. But with the NCAA raking in huge sums of money with its larger sports programs, its decision on Miami could signal the league’s direction amidst recent calls for reform, particularly on the issue of compensating athletes.

blog comments powered by Disqus

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.



Frontline Journalism Fund

Supporting Investigative Reporting

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Major funding for FRONTLINE is provided by John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Additional funding is provided by the Park Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Wyncote Foundation, and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation.

Privacy Policy   Journalistic Guidelines   PBS Privacy Policy   PBS Terms of Use   Corporate Sponsorship
FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2015 WGBH Educational Foundation
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.