tehranbureau An independent source of news on Iran and the Iranian diaspora
nextback

Suspected Iran Ties to Extremists

27 Jul 2010 16:596 Comments

WSJ | July 27, 2010

Cooperation among Iran, al Qaeda and other Sunni extremist groups is more extensive than previously known to the public, according to details buried in the tens of thousands of military intelligence documents released by an independent group Sunday.

U.S. officials and Middle East analysts said some of the most explosive information contained in the WikiLeaks documents detail Iran's alleged ties to the Taliban and al Qaeda, and the facilitating role Tehran may have played in providing arms from sources as varied as North Korea and Algeria.

The officials have for years received reports of Iran smuggling arms to the Taliban. The WikiLeaks documents, however, appear to give new evidence of direct contacts between Iranian officials and the Taliban's and al Qaeda's senior leadership. It also outlines Iran's alleged role in brokering arms deals between North Korea and Pakistan-based militants, particularly militant leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and al Qaeda.

WikiLeaks and the Iran-AQ Connection

FP | July 27, 2010

Most of the response to the WikiLeaks Afghanistan document release thus far has focused on the absence of major revelations, with most of the details reinforcing existing analysis rather than undermining official discourse about the war. A similar response is appropriate to a story making the rounds that the documents bolster the case for significant connections between Iran and al-Qaeda. Information in the documents, according to the Wall Street Journal, "appear to give new evidence of direct contacts between Iranian officials and the Taliban's and al Qaeda's senior leadership." What's more important in these stories than the details found in the documents about Iran's activities in Afghanistan is the attempt to spin them into a narrative of "Iranian ties to al-Qaeda" to bolster the weak case for an American attack on Iran.

There's no secret about Iran's role in Afghanistan, of course -- this has long been a staple of the debate over Afghan policy, and has also long been pointed out as an area of potential cooperation or conflict between Washington and Tehran. As with much of the rest of the WikiLeaks documents, much of what has been found about Iran's role in Afghanistan is already generally known, while other information in them is of dubious provenance. It's not like we didn't know about Iran and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. These new details do add to the case for taking Iran into account more effectively when designing Afghanistan policy, on both the military and political dimensions. But they don't add up to some kind of smoking gun demonstrating an Iranian alliance with al-Qaeda.

US hunts Afghan war files leaker

Al Jazeera | July 27, 2010

The US defence department has launched an investigation to identify who leaked tens of thousands of classified documents on the war in Afghanistan to whistleblower website.

Officials said on Monday that whoever handed over the about 91,000 documents to Wikileaks appeared to have security clearance and access to sensitive documents.

"We will do what is necessary to try to determine who is responsible for the leaking of this information," Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, said.

He warned that while it remained unclear who had handed over the information more leaks were possible.

"Until we know who's responsible, you have to hold out the possibility that there could be more information that has yet to be disclosed. And that's obviously a concern."

Former CIA Chief Misquoted, Never Mind About War with Iran

VF | July 27, 2010

The AP has published a slight correction to the assertion that Hayden characterized war as inevitable: Hayden did not, in fact, characterize war as inevitable. "A spokeswoman for Hayden responded that he made his ["inexorable"] reference to Iran's push toward acquiring a nuclear program and not to military action," the news organization reports.

sanctions

Iran fuel imports nosedive as sanctions bite: source

Reuters | July 27, 2010

Only three cargoes of gasoline have so far reached Iran in July, according to a shipping document seen by Reuters, much less than the seasonal norm, as new sanctions cause ships carrying fuel to be diverted.

A series of new sanctions agreed since June specifically targets Iran's oil trade and industry, making it even harder to do business with the Islamic Republic. The EU adopted formally its latest measures on Monday.

Traditionally during the summer holiday driving season, Iran needs 11-13 cargoes a month, a Dubai-based trader told Reuters.

The document seen by Reuters showed only three cargoes of gasoline had arrived this month and were supplied by Turkish refiner Tupras and Unipec, the trading arm of China's Sinopec.

Canada Hits Iran With New Sanctions

RFE/RL | July 27, 2010

Canada has followed the European Union in adopting tougher sanctions targeting Iran's energy sector in an effort to curb its disputed nuclear program.

The European and Canadian sanctions include measures to block dealing with Iranian banks and steps to prevent investment in Tehran's oil and gas sector, including refining.

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said his country's new measures will include a ban on any new Canadian investment in Iran's oil and gas sector.

features

Far From Iran, a Struggle to Stay Involved

NYT | July 27, 2010

On a recent muggy afternoon in Washington Aliakbar Mousavi, a former member of Parliament, sat at a white table in a small Google conference room, imploring a top executive to provide more Persian-language Internet tools.

Speaking in halting English acquired during a year in the United States, Mr. Mousavi told Robert O. Boorstin, the company's director of public policy, that activists inside Iran desperately needed Google earth, Google advertising and other services that can help thwart repression.

Mr. Boorstin was sympathetic if noncommittal, promising to consult with various engineers.

SHAREtwitterfacebookSTUMBLEUPONbalatarin reddit digg del.icio.us

6 Comments

u.s. imperialist dogs trying to destroy Iran. They will not be successful. Iran will prevail. Iran will survive. Iran is great.

Radical_Guy / July 27, 2010 10:13 PM

Radical_guy,

You are hilarious! So funny. Of course, Iran will survive. What? Is Iran going to disappear in some strange nuclear attack followed by an odd surge in the Arabian gulf that swallows up only the territorial borders of the current Iran?

I think you may mean the Iranian government will survive. Am I correct? By "Iran will prevail" do you really mean that the ruling class of Iran will prevail?

Iran will survive. But will it have a government that is desperate to antagonize and alienate other nations to maintain it's power over it's own citizens? Or will it have a government that treats others with respect and honesty. Giving the very base starting point that they will not threaten to kill them if at all possible.

muhammad billy bob / July 28, 2010 12:25 AM

The government of Iran has the support of the majority of their citizens. Believe it -- it is true.

Radical_Guy / July 28, 2010 5:13 AM

Hey Radi Guy
You must be on something Bra, are you really thinking that here is the iranian national TV and folks here are litters of mullahs in their Qom seminary dorms. What the s... thing to say"The government of Iran has the support of the majority of their citizen".

Unless what you mean by majority is that 10% followers of the system and of course you dont think of the rest of Iran as actual citizens of that country. They are there to beaten up, repressed, brutalized, fooled to come to ballot boxes and then raped in the Kahrizak kind of places. Am i right?

PersianTraveler / July 28, 2010 9:13 AM

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE LIKE THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND I ALONG WITH COUNTLESS OTHER AMERICAN WENT TO VIETNAM FROM A LIE OR A FALSE FLAG OPERATION THIS IS NO DIFFERENT WHY ARE WE IN TWO WARS AT THE SAME TIME OH I FORGOT TERRORIST WELL THE PEOPLE THAT SENT THE MEN AND WOMEN TO THESE TWO SPOTS ARE THE REAL TERRORIST
,WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO WAIT ANOTHER 40
OR 50 YEARS TO FIGURE OUT THAT WE HAVE BEEN TRICKED AGAIN'..

DOYLE CARTER / July 31, 2010 6:28 PM

So,we are all so afraid of Iran having a nuclear power source that we took all of their gasoline away from them, their usual power source? I'm not sure if I get that.

A Wallace / September 16, 2010 1:26 AM