<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blueprint America &#187; Joe Biden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/tag/joe-biden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica</link>
	<description>A spotlight on America’s decaying and neglected infrastructure.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:15:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Some transit stimulus now available for operating costs</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/blogs/the-dig-some-transit-stimulus-now-available-for-operating-costs/730/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/blogs/the-dig-some-transit-stimulus-now-available-for-operating-costs/730/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom mcnamara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commuting & Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom McNamara, Blueprint America




President Obama, with Vice-President Biden, signing the stimulus bill into law last February in Denver. &#124;&#124; Photo: The New York Times



When the stimulus bill was passed last February, it sent billions of dollars to the nation's mass-transit agencies. Still, the money was purposed for only new equipment and construction -- nothing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Tom McNamara, Blueprint America</em></p>
<div class="captionRight">
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/us/politics/18web-stim.html"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-731" src="http://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/files/2009/06/nytimes17obama-600338222.jpg" alt="" width="338" height="220" /></a>President Obama, with Vice-President Biden, signing the stimulus bill into law last February in Denver.<em> </em>|| Photo: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/us/politics/18web-stim.html">The New York Times</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>When the stimulus bill was passed last February, it sent billions of dollars to the nation&#8217;s mass-transit agencies. Still, the money was purposed for only new equipment and construction &#8212; nothing to operate the systems, even as many are cutting service, laying off workers or raising fares.</p>
<p>An agency may get a new bus or build a new bus shelter using stimulus dollars, but, potentially, they would not have the operating funds to employ a new driver to run the new bus to the new stop.</p>
<p>For several months following the release of stimulus funds to transit agencies, the Obama Administration seemed opposed to repurposing any of the federal money to keep transit operating budgets solvent. Instead, only the benefits of new building &#8212; such as job creation &#8212; was championed.</p>
<p>Last Friday, however, President Obama signed legislation into law enabling transit agencies to use up to 10 percent of their stimulus dollars to cover operating costs for equipment and facilities. The provision, oddly, was tucked inside the latest war spending bill.</p>
<blockquote><p>[This is an excerpt from the text of the bill]<br />
<strong>H.R. 2346: Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>Sec. 1202.</strong></em> A recipient and subrecipient of funds appropriated in Public Law 111-5 and apportioned pursuant to section 5311 and section 5336 (other than subsection (i)(1) and (j)) of title 49, United States Code, may use up to 10 percent of the amount apportioned for the operating costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation or for eligible activities under section 5311(f): Provided, That a grant obligating such funds on or after February 17, 2009, may be amended to allow a recipient and subrecipient to use the funds made available for operating assistance: Provided further, That applicable chapter 53 requirements apply, except for the Federal share which shall be, at the option of the recipient, up to 100 percent.</p></blockquote>
<div class="captionLeft">
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE55L69G20090623"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-719" src="http://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/files/2009/06/reuters-dc-train-crash.jpg" alt="" width="332" height="182" /></a>D.C. Metro crash || Photo: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE55L69G20090623">Reuters</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Though the funds were made available <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/uncategorized/the-dig-dc-metro-train-car-was-overdue-brake-work/721/">following the Metro subway crash last week</a> in Washington, D.C. &#8212; the potential cause of which has been associated with the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/blogs/the-dig-dc-metro-accident-update-the-aging-us-transit-system/727/">operating budget problems</a> of the city&#8217;s mass-transit system &#8212; the legislation has no direct connection with the accident.</p>
<post_thumbnail>/wnet/blueprintamerica/files/2009/06/nytimes17obama-600200&#215;100.jpg</post_thumbnail>
<listpage_excerpt>When the stimulus bill was passed last February, it sent billions of dollars to the nation&#8217;s mass-transit agencies. Still, the money was purposed for only new equipment and construction &#8212; nothing to operate the systems, even as many are cutting service, laying off workers or raising fares. </listpage_excerpt>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/blogs/the-dig-some-transit-stimulus-now-available-for-operating-costs/730/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America in Gridlock: [REPORT] Infrastructure of the stimulus plan: Senate vs. House spending on transportation</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/reports/america-in-gridlock/report-infrastructure-of-the-stimulus-plan-senate-vs-house-spending-on-transportation/373/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/reports/america-in-gridlock/report-infrastructure-of-the-stimulus-plan-senate-vs-house-spending-on-transportation/373/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom mcnamara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Only Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom McNamara, Blueprint America

As the recovery plan was debated in Congress, the House and Senate had seemingly similar but, at the same time, different ideas on how stimulus money should fund transportation projects.

In the Senate: $46 billion for transportation projects, including $27 billion for highway and bridge construction and repair and $11.5 billion for mass [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Tom McNamara, Blueprint America</em></p>
<p>As the recovery plan was debated in Congress, the House and Senate had seemingly similar but, at the same time, different ideas on how stimulus money should fund transportation projects.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j81g2abYnnR730DbzIZpkDsGPAJwD968TN1O0">Senate</a>: $46 billion for transportation projects, including $27 billion for highway and bridge construction and repair and $11.5 billion for mass transit and rail projects.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j81g2abYnnR730DbzIZpkDsGPAJwD968TN1O0">House</a>: $47 billion for transportation projects, including $27 billion for highway and bridge construction and repair and $12 billion for mass transit, including $7.5 billion to buy transit equipment such as buses; $12.4 billion in rail and mass transit projects.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Issue</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Senate Bill</strong></p>
<p>(passed Senate    2/10/09)</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>House Bill</strong></p>
<p>(passed House    1/28/09)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top"><strong>Funding Levels</strong></td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Total Transportation Funding</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$45,470,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$46,120,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Total Transit Funding</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$8,400,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$12,000,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Transit Funding Breakdown</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">Urbanized Area Formula    Grants (5307)  -  $5.96 billion (71%)</p>
<p>Rural Area Formula Grants    (5311) &#8211; $840 million (10%)</p>
<p>Growing States and High    Density Formula Grants (5340) &#8211; $1.6 billion (19%)</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">Urbanized Area Formula    Grants (5307) &#8211; $6.75 billion</p>
<p>Rural Area Formula Grants    (5311) &#8211; $750 million</p>
<p>Fixed Guideway Modernization    (Rail Mod) &#8211; $2 billion</p>
<p>Capital Investment Grants    (New Starts) &#8211; $2.5 billion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Total Highway Funding</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$27,060,000</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$30,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Highway Funding Breakdown</p>
<p>(Suballocation)</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>Funds distributed through    STP program</li>
<li>40% of funds will be    suballocated to urbanized areas, and are eligible for transit</li>
<li>5% of funds reserved for    CMAQ, and eligible for transit</li>
<li>$60 million for waterborne    transit-</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>Funds distributed through    STP program</li>
<li>45% of funds will be    suballocated to urbanized areas, and are eligible for transit</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Total Intercity and High Speed Rail Funding</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$3,100,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$1,100,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Intercity and High Speed Rail Funding Breakdown</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">Amtrak &#8211; $850 million</p>
<p>Intercity Passenger Rail    Grant</p>
<p>Program &#8211; $250 million</p>
<p>High Speed Rail Corridor    Investments &#8211; $2 billion<strong> </strong></td>
<td width="312" valign="top">Amtrak -  $800 million</p>
<p>Intercity Passenger Rail    Program* &#8211; $300 million</p>
<p>(Priority given to High    Speed Rail projects)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Supplemental    Discretionary Grants for a National Transportation System Program</p>
<p>(Multi-Modal)</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>$5,500,000,000</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>No    Provision</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top"><strong>Transit Program    Details</strong></td>
<td width="342" valign="top"><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Urbanized Area, Rural Area and Growing States and High    Density States Formula Grant Programs (5307, 5311, 5340)</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>Urbanized Area Formula    Grants (5307)  -  $5.96 billion</li>
<li>Rural Area Formula Grants    (5311) &#8211; $840 million</li>
<li> Growing States and High    Density Formula Grants (5340) &#8211; $1.6 billion</li>
<li>$200,000,000 Set aside for    discretionary grants to “to public transportation agencies for capital    investments to reduce energy consumption or greenhouse gas emissions;</li>
<li>Small Transit Intensive    Cities formula not used in 5307 apportionments</li>
<li>50% of funds must be obligated within 180    days;</li>
<li>Remaining 50% must be    obligated within 1 year;</li>
<li>“Use it or lose it    provision” -  First 50% of funds not    obligated within 180days redistributed to recipients who have successfully    obligated their apportionment; second 50% not obligated within 1 year    redistributed to “Supplemental Discretionary Grants for a National    Transportation System Program”</li>
<li>100% federal share</li>
<li> funds shall be apportioned    by FTA “as soon as possible”</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>Urbanized Area Formula    Grants (5307) &#8211; $6.75 billion</li>
<li>Rural Area Formula Grants    (5311) &#8211; $750 million</li>
<li> Growing States and High    Density Formula Grants (5340) &#8211; $0</li>
<li> Small Transit Intensive    Cities formula not used in 5307 apportionments</li>
<li>50% of funds must be    obligated within 90 days; remaining 50% must be obligated within 2 years</li>
<li>“Use it or lose it    provision” – DOT shall redistribute funds not obligated within the specified    time periods to other recipients eligible under the programs to use in a    “timely manner”</li>
<li>100% federal share</li>
<li>FTA required to apportion    funds within 7 days of enactment</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Fixed Guideway Modernization Program (Rail-Mod)</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">No provision.</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$2 billion provided</li>
<li>50% of funds must be    obligated within 90 days; remaining 50% must be obligated within 2 years</li>
<li>“Use it or lose it    provision” – DOT shall redistribute funds not obligated within the specified    time periods to other recipients eligible under the programs to use in a    “timely manner”</li>
<li> 100% federal share</li>
<li> FTA required to apportion    funds within 7 days of enactment;</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Capital Investment Grants</p>
<p>(New Starts Program)</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">No Provision.</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$2.5 billion provided</li>
<li>discretionary grants    competitively awarded by DOT</li>
<li>priority shall be given to projects that are    currently in construction or are able to award contracts based on bids<br />
within 90 days of enactment    (FFGAs)</li>
<li>50% of funds must be spent    (contracts or binding commitments) by grantee within 90 days of award or be    redistributed by DOT</li>
<li> current matching    requirements remain</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Supplemental    Discretionary Grants for a National Transportation System Program</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$5.5 billion provided for    discretionary grants to states and local governments for the following    eligible projects:Highway and bridge projects, including    interstate rehabilitation,        improvements to rural collector road system, reconstruction of    overpasses and interchanges, bridge replacements, and seismic retrofit projects    for bridges and road realignments;Public transportation projects including    New Starts and Small Starts projects;Passenger and freight rail improvements    and port infrastructure improvements.</li>
<li>Grants range from    $20,000,000 to $500,000,000;</li>
<li> 100% federal share;</li>
<li> projects must be completed    within 3 years</li>
<li> funds must be distributed    equitably among geographic regions and urban and rural areas</li>
<li> -Secretary must issue grant    criteria within 75 days of enactment;-applications must be    submitted within 180 days of enactment;</li>
<li> -projects must be awarded    within 1 year of enactment;</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">No provision.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top"><strong>Rail Program Details</strong></td>
<td width="342" valign="top"></td>
<td width="312" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Amtrak</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$850 million for Amtrak    Capital Improvements</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$800 million for Amtrak    Capital Improvements</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Intercity    Passenger Rail Grants</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$250 million for Intercity    Passenger Rail grants</li>
<li>funds distributed under the    Sec. 24401 Intercity Passenger Rail Grant program</li>
<li>100% federal share</li>
<li>projects must be in STIP at    time of application</li>
<li>priority given to projects    that can be completed within 2 years and increase safety and reliability of    intercity passenger trains.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$300 million for Intercity    Passenger Rail grants;</li>
<li>funds distributed under the    Sec. 24401 Intercity Passenger Rail Grant program;</li>
<li>preference given to    projects that can be awarded within 180 days of enactment;</li>
<li>preference given to FTRA    compliant rolling stock;</li>
<li>preference given to    projects that promote High Speed Rail</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">High Speed Rail    Corridor Program</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$2 billion provided for    discretionary grants for capital projects in designated high speed rail    corridors;</li>
<li>grants distributed under    the High Speed Rail program (Sec. 26106)</li>
<li>grants must be awarded by    September 30, 2011</li>
<li>100% federal share</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">No provision.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top"><strong>Other Issues</strong></td>
<td width="342" valign="top"></td>
<td width="312" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Maritime    Transportation</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$60 million in grants under    the FHWA’s Ferry Boat Discretionary Program; competitive discretionary grants    to be distributed to states for the construction of ferry boats and ferry    terminal facilities.</li>
<li>priority given to projects    that can be completed within 2 years;</li>
<li>$100 million provided for    grants for “assistance to small shipyards,” through the Maritime    Administration for capital improvements to small shipyards to improve    productivity of nation’s shipbuilding industry</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">No provision.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Commuter Tax    Benefit</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>Increases monthly pre-tax commuter transit and vanpool benefits to the same    level as provided for pre-tax parking benefits, up from $120 to $230 per    month.</li>
<li>Provision effectiveness to    coincide with enactment.</li>
<li>Sunsets December 31,    2010.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">No provision.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">High Speed Rail    Bonds</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>Current    provision states a project is eligible for tax-exempt bonds only if a project    is reasonably expected to operate at a speed in excess of 150 mph.</li>
<li>Chairman’s    Modifications alters language to allow projects to be eligible for tax-exempt    bonds if a project is reasonably expected to attain a top speed of 150    mph.</li>
<li>Only    bonds issued after enactment are eligible.</li>
<li>No    sunset provision.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">No provision.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Transit Security    Grants</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$100,000,000    for Public Transportation Security Assistance, Railroad Security Assistance    and Amtrak Security Updates;</li>
<li>Funds    available until 9/30/2010</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">No provision.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="229" valign="top">Energy Efficiency    and Conservation Block Grant Program</td>
<td width="342" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$3.5    billion provided for state and local governments to implement transit    eligible energy efficiency and conservation programs</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="312" valign="top">
<ul>
<li>$4.2 billion provided for    state and local governments to implement transit eligible energy efficiency    and conservation programs</li>
<li> $2.1 billion to be    distributed via formula, remaining $2.1 billion to be awarded via    discretionary grant program</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>Table Sources: <a href="http://www.apta.com/government_affairs/washrep/2009february10_side.cfm">American Public Transportation Association</a>, House Appropriations and Ways and Means committees, Senate Appropriations and Finance committees</em></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<post_thumbnail>/wnet/blueprintamerica/files/2008/11/caltrain_baby_bullet.jpg</post_thumbnail>
<listpage_excerpt>As the recovery plan was debated in Congress, the House and Senate had seemingly similar but, at the same time, different ideas on how stimulus money should fund transportation projects.</listpage_excerpt>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/reports/america-in-gridlock/report-infrastructure-of-the-stimulus-plan-senate-vs-house-spending-on-transportation/373/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served @ 2012-05-28 20:57:41 by W3 Total Cache -->
