<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:26:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Renner</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Renner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d never heard of this opera before I watched it today. I thought the staging, acting, and music were all top notch. The entire first act was, I thought, fascinating and well-paced; but the second act was waaaay too long!
The tension of the second act taking place literally in the shadow of an atomic bomb which we all know is going to go off, eventually became tedium. During the last half of the act, the characters simply restated themselves over and over again. When the siren sounded for the &quot;five minute warning,&quot; I actually said out loud, &quot;Thank God!&quot;
It was longer than five minutes, by the way. This is a fascinating story, I shouldn&#039;t have been looking at my watch during the climax of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never heard of this opera before I watched it today. I thought the staging, acting, and music were all top notch. The entire first act was, I thought, fascinating and well-paced; but the second act was waaaay too long!<br />
The tension of the second act taking place literally in the shadow of an atomic bomb which we all know is going to go off, eventually became tedium. During the last half of the act, the characters simply restated themselves over and over again. When the siren sounded for the &#8220;five minute warning,&#8221; I actually said out loud, &#8220;Thank God!&#8221;<br />
It was longer than five minutes, by the way. This is a fascinating story, I shouldn&#8217;t have been looking at my watch during the climax of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Turk</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Turk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mr Ware, although not having seen the San Fran production, I will reserve judgement on the Met production.  I actually found the setting in the Met production very engaging and appropriate.
I won&#039;t even comment on the &quot;Crap&quot; comments - obviously written without any thought.  I doubt the person watched the piece.  Is this for everyone - no.  But neither was Rite of Spring when it was first performed.  This is what modern opera should be all about.  This is a rich and complex piece that will take me several viewings to fully absorb.  

&quot;The more decisive a weapon is, the more surely it will be used, and no arguments will help.  Could we have started the atomic age with clean hands?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr Ware, although not having seen the San Fran production, I will reserve judgement on the Met production.  I actually found the setting in the Met production very engaging and appropriate.<br />
I won&#8217;t even comment on the &#8220;Crap&#8221; comments &#8211; obviously written without any thought.  I doubt the person watched the piece.  Is this for everyone &#8211; no.  But neither was Rite of Spring when it was first performed.  This is what modern opera should be all about.  This is a rich and complex piece that will take me several viewings to fully absorb.  </p>
<p>&#8220;The more decisive a weapon is, the more surely it will be used, and no arguments will help.  Could we have started the atomic age with clean hands?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Ware</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-470</guid>
		<description>My regrets to Mr. Williamson (Comment #6, above.)

This work is great contemporary operatic art.  Previously, I watched the PBS special on the creation of the San Francisco Opera premier.  I really must say I liked the production concept and values from that production—such as I could glean from the special—better than those chosen for the Met production.  In my view, the Met production was over produced in the sense that it became a lot about the scenery and the figures in the facade.  I felt the San Francisco Opera production was more focused in the areas of the personal ethical/scientific conflict of the principals.  That to me is the opera.

I loved what I saw of Peter Sellers imaginative, expressionistic staging for the San Francisco production.  What the PBS special conveyed about that production was that we were in for a bold, convention-breaking experience.  The opera seemed an attempt to expose the ethical dynamic embraced within the advance of scientific knowledge/possibility and the results in humanistic terms those efforts may engender.  Humanity cannot always be said to “benefit” from applied science while pure science most always could be said to benefit the application of science.

That this opera exists is a great thing.  There can be no doubt that the opera is art.  John Adam&#039;s music and Peter Sellers libretto combine to become a profound, if not transparent, statement about our world.  I do not believe art can remain art and be transparent.  Art invites our deeper examination and consideration—our pondering of issues toward which it directs our attention and special focus.  This opera does that “in spades” for me.

Thank you PBS for presenting it.

A general comment about Great Performances:  My dream is that Great Performances at the Met—indeed all the Met performances—will become available on Blu-ray disc.  I will buy every one.  High definition, superb sound and the big screen—mine is 49&quot; high and appropriately wide—make the experience of these performances &quot;Great Performances&quot;—both as the art they present and my ability to experience that art 3000 miles away from the live performance.

My Nirvana approaches via these PBS experiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My regrets to Mr. Williamson (Comment #6, above.)</p>
<p>This work is great contemporary operatic art.  Previously, I watched the PBS special on the creation of the San Francisco Opera premier.  I really must say I liked the production concept and values from that production—such as I could glean from the special—better than those chosen for the Met production.  In my view, the Met production was over produced in the sense that it became a lot about the scenery and the figures in the facade.  I felt the San Francisco Opera production was more focused in the areas of the personal ethical/scientific conflict of the principals.  That to me is the opera.</p>
<p>I loved what I saw of Peter Sellers imaginative, expressionistic staging for the San Francisco production.  What the PBS special conveyed about that production was that we were in for a bold, convention-breaking experience.  The opera seemed an attempt to expose the ethical dynamic embraced within the advance of scientific knowledge/possibility and the results in humanistic terms those efforts may engender.  Humanity cannot always be said to “benefit” from applied science while pure science most always could be said to benefit the application of science.</p>
<p>That this opera exists is a great thing.  There can be no doubt that the opera is art.  John Adam&#8217;s music and Peter Sellers libretto combine to become a profound, if not transparent, statement about our world.  I do not believe art can remain art and be transparent.  Art invites our deeper examination and consideration—our pondering of issues toward which it directs our attention and special focus.  This opera does that “in spades” for me.</p>
<p>Thank you PBS for presenting it.</p>
<p>A general comment about Great Performances:  My dream is that Great Performances at the Met—indeed all the Met performances—will become available on Blu-ray disc.  I will buy every one.  High definition, superb sound and the big screen—mine is 49&#8243; high and appropriately wide—make the experience of these performances &#8220;Great Performances&#8221;—both as the art they present and my ability to experience that art 3000 miles away from the live performance.</p>
<p>My Nirvana approaches via these PBS experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomomi Sasaki :: ripplet.jp &#124; 今シーズンのMETライブビューイング</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomomi Sasaki :: ripplet.jp &#124; 今シーズンのMETライブビューイング</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-432</guid>
		<description>[...] 予告編（ビデオ） [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 予告編（ビデオ） [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Yo, mah man MC Ally G. an&#039; da Metro posse dun&#039; busted sum funky grooves all on up in da Big House!!  Funky fresh J. Coolidge slid us hiz bes&#039; beatbox trix evah!  Don&#039;t kare watch&#039;all say, Dr. A&#039;s here 2 stay!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, mah man MC Ally G. an&#8217; da Metro posse dun&#8217; busted sum funky grooves all on up in da Big House!!  Funky fresh J. Coolidge slid us hiz bes&#8217; beatbox trix evah!  Don&#8217;t kare watch&#8217;all say, Dr. A&#8217;s here 2 stay!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Dearth</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Dearth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-363</guid>
		<description>I really hope this will be aired again, and aslo released on DVD.  I saw the HD theatre showing, and have listened to it (courtesy of Metropolitan Opera Radio on Dish Network) probably more than 20 times.  I know the Sellars production is already available on DVD, but I thought the MET production was much better.  I found all the movement in the Sellars production really distracting.  The MET production was much more focused and really built the tension beautifully.  Some of the music is just haunting  Kitt&#039;s &quot;Am I in your light&quot; and Oppenheimer&#039;s &quot;Batter my heart&quot; that closes the first act are both amazing.  The end of the first act is especially powerful in the MET staging.  I loved Nixon in China, but I think this may be even a stronger piece.  Adams is just brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope this will be aired again, and aslo released on DVD.  I saw the HD theatre showing, and have listened to it (courtesy of Metropolitan Opera Radio on Dish Network) probably more than 20 times.  I know the Sellars production is already available on DVD, but I thought the MET production was much better.  I found all the movement in the Sellars production really distracting.  The MET production was much more focused and really built the tension beautifully.  Some of the music is just haunting  Kitt&#8217;s &#8220;Am I in your light&#8221; and Oppenheimer&#8217;s &#8220;Batter my heart&#8221; that closes the first act are both amazing.  The end of the first act is especially powerful in the MET staging.  I loved Nixon in China, but I think this may be even a stronger piece.  Adams is just brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth P. Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth P. Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-318</guid>
		<description>I have read about and talk with people who have mixed reactions to this work, much like here, which just shows how diverse we all are. 

I guess I am optimitic, hoping that all music can and will inform me positively or negatively, deeply or superficially. I liked this work, but I will admit there are places that seemed a bit long, especially in the second act. The rationale, I would assume, was to build the tension and anticipation for the final scene. While it might not rate in the top ten for me, I was glad to be exposed to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read about and talk with people who have mixed reactions to this work, much like here, which just shows how diverse we all are. </p>
<p>I guess I am optimitic, hoping that all music can and will inform me positively or negatively, deeply or superficially. I liked this work, but I will admit there are places that seemed a bit long, especially in the second act. The rationale, I would assume, was to build the tension and anticipation for the final scene. While it might not rate in the top ten for me, I was glad to be exposed to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil Herring</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil Herring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-286</guid>
		<description>I generally love experimental opera and try to write operas myself. It is a difficult media. I enjoyed Doctor Atomic except that I thought Oppenheimer had too many long looks when he could have been singing. He has a marvelous face but he needed to be singing instead of just looking which turned into a rather static, empty staring. The staging was wonderful but the music was tentative and unsure and did not go with the blocking. However, all criticisms aside, I think it is wonderful that the Met has introduced this contemporary opera into its repertoire! Very moving. I need to see it through because I only was channel surfing and found it accidentally. I also watched the production in rehearsal and the composer John Adams is truly walking were no composer has walked. It is an experiment and naturally has a long way to go. I think he is a wonderful composer. I need to hear/see it again. Are you going to replay it again? Thanks for programming this new opera! Cecil Herring, a modern opera lover particularly opera conpositions by Philip Glass. How can I get a program guide? Sign me up!386-789-8010. 3242 Bretton Woods Terr. Deltona, FL 32725 cherring@spacescapes.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally love experimental opera and try to write operas myself. It is a difficult media. I enjoyed Doctor Atomic except that I thought Oppenheimer had too many long looks when he could have been singing. He has a marvelous face but he needed to be singing instead of just looking which turned into a rather static, empty staring. The staging was wonderful but the music was tentative and unsure and did not go with the blocking. However, all criticisms aside, I think it is wonderful that the Met has introduced this contemporary opera into its repertoire! Very moving. I need to see it through because I only was channel surfing and found it accidentally. I also watched the production in rehearsal and the composer John Adams is truly walking were no composer has walked. It is an experiment and naturally has a long way to go. I think he is a wonderful composer. I need to hear/see it again. Are you going to replay it again? Thanks for programming this new opera! Cecil Herring, a modern opera lover particularly opera conpositions by Philip Glass. How can I get a program guide? Sign me up!386-789-8010. 3242 Bretton Woods Terr. Deltona, FL 32725 <a href="mailto:cherring@spacescapes.com">cherring@spacescapes.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-250</guid>
		<description>I regret only seeing the last 45 minutes of this performance. Still, it was the most moving and thought-provoking thing I saw on television in all of 2008. (Mr. Williamson no doubt thinks &quot;South Park&quot; is high art.) Will it be re-broadcast? Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regret only seeing the last 45 minutes of this performance. Still, it was the most moving and thought-provoking thing I saw on television in all of 2008. (Mr. Williamson no doubt thinks &#8220;South Park&#8221; is high art.) Will it be re-broadcast? Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/episodes/gp-at-the-met-doctor-atomic/introduction/429/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/?p=429#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Viewed the Independent Lens coverage of the Met Production; missed the Dec. 29th airing; also hope for a re-airing in the L.A. area?  PBS is truly the broadcast center of Performing Arts coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viewed the Independent Lens coverage of the Met Production; missed the Dec. 29th airing; also hope for a re-airing in the L.A. area?  PBS is truly the broadcast center of Performing Arts coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
