<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Human Spark &#187; computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/tag/computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark</link>
	<description>Alan Alda visits scientists to find the answer to one question: What makes us human?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 20:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In the News: Why We Attribute Human Qualities to Machines</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/topics/neuroscience/why-we-attribute-human-qualities-to-machines/70/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/topics/neuroscience/why-we-attribute-human-qualities-to-machines/70/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tanner vea</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropomorphism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[







It feels natural to attribute human-like properties to machines -- think of encouraging and then cursing a computer that seems determined to lose your files. Now researchers observe that the more "human" a robot seems, the more active are the brain regions that think about the intentions and desires of others -- even if that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="captionRight">
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/files/2008/08/286_news_machinesthink.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-68" title="Can machines think?" src="http://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/files/2008/08/286_news_machinesthink.jpg" alt="Can machines think?" width="286" height="146" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>It feels natural to attribute human-like properties to machines &#8212; think of encouraging and then cursing a computer that seems determined to lose your files. Now researchers observe that the more &#8220;human&#8221; a robot seems, the more active are the brain regions that think about the intentions and desires of others &#8212; even if that other is a machine.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080708200658.htm" target="_blank">full story here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/topics/neuroscience/why-we-attribute-human-qualities-to-machines/70/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served @ 2012-05-29 06:08:05 by W3 Total Cache -->
