Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

Music and Evolution
David Rothenberg on Bird Songs

Scientist and musician David Rothernberg takes discussion of bird songs a step further than biological imperative, and recognizes these tunes distinct to each species as music.

Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.

David Rothenberg: When I began to realize when you hear a bird song slow down like this, you really hear why bird song is music, it just doesn’t like music. But it really is musical utterance. Why do I say that? Because it’s a pattern of sounds with a beginning, middle and end with a real shape that is performed. Each species is performing a different song, each species is doing it a different song, one kind of particular sound that it needs to do. The song of a blue jay isn’t going to work for a mockingbird. A song of a cat bird isn’t going to work for a thrasher. They all have these different things. Yet the purpose of the song is pretty much the same: males are singing to attract mates and defend territories. People who read my books sometimes say “Rothenberg doesn’t believe male birds sing to attract mates and defend territories.” That’s not true. It’s not that I don’t believe that. That’s what the song is for but that’s not what the song is. Many bird song scientists stop asking what the song is once they decide what it’s for. But what is it? It’s really music, a series of pattern sounds that must be performed a certain way. It’s not like language, it doesn’t have a complex meaning that’s hidden in the syntax. Like some other sounds birds make do have that, like chickadees have 20 calls, they’ve all been studied and identified. A certain sound means I’m hungry, another sound is a general warning sound, another sound is a specific warning sound only if a hawk flies overhead. These kinds of sounds have very specific meanings. They’re more like language. What is remarkable is that these sounds are instinctual. They are kind of learned from birth. The birds know them. They’re not learned—they have those abilities to make those sounds and understand them from birth. But the songs, which are really these musical utterances, they have to be learned. Most songbirds learn their songs from adult male birds. It’s fascinating that they already have the ability to understand the songs that are like language with real specific meanings but these musical kinds of songs whose complexity cannot be explained by their purpose. These things they have to spend time learning. It seems to me it should be like the reverse. Why should you have the take all this time to learn  something whose purpose is so simple.

Bookmark    Print    Email    Comment/s (5)

(5 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...
5 comments
Henry Faulkner -- June 25th, 2009 at 6:37 pm

Stating that songbirds produce music and then saying it is not a language, is really incorrect. I know as a musician, that all music is a language, with deliberate messages that will arouse thought processes in ones who are experiencing it. One example I will site is I remember a piece of music I was listening to and all of a sudden, I began laughing, as though I had been told the best funny story. My experience is proof positive, that anything, weather it be visual or audible, is language. And the same message, can mean different things to different people, and different things to the same people at different times….Henry.

benjamin guile -- June 28th, 2009 at 4:30 am

two comments: 1: on Faulkner’s observation, it all depends on how the category “language” is defined. If it means “anything conveying meaning”, then everything known to the viewer conveys meaning, such as guns, the sun, drum beats, boxes, etc. (stretching the definition way beyond Rothenberg’s goal). I think he was meaning that the variations within the songbirds’ melodies did not appear to be conveying specific identifiable messages dependent on the variations within the songs, unlike the more language-like songs of the chickadee to which he referred.

benjamin guile -- June 28th, 2009 at 4:33 am

second comment: Where were the bird songs, I hoped? It would have been wonderful to hear him comment on the songs and their variations. Anyone who knows of any good websites for this kind of narrative, please let me know? benguile@gmail.com :>)

Jenny -- July 1st, 2009 at 3:38 am

benjamin guile If you look to the right of the screen at the top corner there is another video called Ofer Tchernichovski on Bird Songs. It kind of gets a little deeper into the songs with birds.

Ms. Cynthia -- July 2nd, 2009 at 4:13 am

Perhaps one day when we can analyze and compare the genomes of various song birds in the same species we will understand why they need to be so complex.

post a comment
Please note that the WNET editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness. No solicitations or advertisements will be allowed. Users may link to other Web sites relevant to discussion, but most often links to commercial Web sites will not be permitted.

YouTube iTunes

Produced by THIRTEEN WNET New York    ©2009 Educational Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved.