Oliver Sacks, MD, FRCP: We are wired for speech, we are wired for spoken language, for expressing and understanding spoken language. That’s to say any human being who is exposed to language at a critical stage of development in their second or third year will acquire language without any explicit form of teaching. Comsky above others has spoken wonderfully about this, but basically exposure to language activates language parts of the brain. However we are not wired for written language in the same way. Written language only goes back five or seven thousand years. There is no built-in circuitry in the brain for written language. But a circuitry is developed through learning to write. A circuitry which may be somewhat different in different people. In other words what is already in the brain is recruited and pressed into a new use when one learns to write. So in this way is music like speech? Or is it like writing? I’m inclined to think, but here only one can speculate, that both of these are involved. I think there are certain aspects of music which do not have any equivalent in speech, in particular the pulse of music, the steady rhythm, and its synchronization with movement. I think there is good reason for supposing for that is built in, and there are anatomical connections, which are strongly and almost exclusively developed in human beings.
Are Humans Wired for Music?
Try not to think of music as the stuff we make with sounds. Divorced from organized sound, music as a function of the brain can be seen as the ability to monitor interrelated and simultaneously changing systems. If there is no change, there is no perception of music. If the change is perceived as random, there is no sense of music . Only when we sense changes that are systematic do we sense music. Still, I’m not talking about music as that stuff we listen to – I’m just talking about the perception of changing systems. For example, when we drive, we experience all the cars around us as simultaneously changing systems.
Seen in this way, music as a function of the brain is a necessary survival tool for the kind of animal we once were – able to perceive multiple threats and opportunities. Like many of our essential skills, it also find form in a purer expression, organized sound.
Attn: (in particular) O. Sax: I just finished watching PBS program on music and brain function. What has science learned, if anything, about effects of repetitive sound and/or lyrics on listener’s disposition? I am predisposed to irritability (bordering on anger) when exposed to exaggerated repetition. Catchy tunes and/or lyrics bother me since I find, with great annoyance, I cannot rid my mind of them for days. This goes for most music with associated lyrics. However I can notice a single note misplayed or a tune that is not exactly correct; therefore I believe I have above average sense of pitch and tune recognition. Also love music of Bach and many other composers but find the majority of more modern, perhaps less-inspired, classical-type music to sound much like poorly coordinated noise. When this happens I find I must shut the music off within a very few minutes. What, if anything, is wrong? Also has there been any work done on correlation between a particular form of music and enhancement of abstract mathematical reasoning? Thank you. Nearly
[...] 관련해서 강의는 아니지만 PBS에서 방송한 것을 볼 수도 [...]
我操~ 他说啥?



(13 votes)

