It is with great sadness that I write this update to all of you.

In May of 2003, Maureen and I arrived at our cabin in Kamchatka for our eighth year in the field, studying the bears chronicled in Walking with Giants. Rosie, Chico, and Biscuit had become part of our family, and we were excited and anxious to see how they were doing. What we found on our arrival was unimaginable: a bear gall bladder hanging on the wall. At first we refused to accept this proclamation as the barbarous message it was meant to be. But as time passed and we could find no trace of any of the bears we had come to know so well, we were forced to accept the meaning of the message: While we had been away for the winter, all our wonderful bears had been killed. Maureen and I could hardly function we were so devastated.

The loss of these bears plunged us deep into grief and anger, and we have struggled to understand the nature of the slaughter. Was this horrible and incontrovertible proof that bears are more adaptable and forgiving than people are? Had these bears been killed precisely because of our success with them?

In time, we would come to understand that it was the success of the ranger program we had funded to protect our bears that ended up being their undoing. People in Kamchatka had finally been coming around to the notion that a live bear was worth more to them than a poached bear. The World Heritage Site in which our cabin sits had long been a sanctuary for poachers, not wildlife, and someone clearly wanted a return to the old status quo.

I have not given up on the work in Kamchatka. From the time I learned that the efficiency of our ranger program was threatening enough to bring about the death of our bears, I have been looking into how I can possibly keep it functioning. I will find a way to continue on my own until some organization, agency or perhaps the Russian government itself, can relieve me.

Although the South Kamchatka Sanctuary, where we have lived with our bears for eight years, has been proclaimed a World Heritage Site, without some form of substantial protection the designation is meaningless. I am determined to find a way to give this wonderful area the care it deserves. As for our ranger program, some crucial aspects of the program have to be adjusted. In the spring of 2004 I will go to Moscow, then on to the Far East to attend meetings in Petropavlovsk.

I have also long seen a need in North America to help communities coexist with bears and other wildlife. I am working on an opportunity to apply much of what our bears taught us in Russia, to our everyday living with them here. I anticipate this will keep me busy for years.

I would like to thank all of you for your letters of concern and your calls for justice. They have helped Maureen and I make it through one of the most difficult times in our lives. It’s people like you who continue to spread the word, help make this world a friendlier place and give us conviction and perseverance to stay on course. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts.

- Charlie Russell

* * *

If you’re interested in learning more about Charlie and Maureen’s bear research in Kamchatka, they’ve written two books on the subject: Grizzly Heart: Living Without Fear Among the Brown Bears of Kamchatka and Grizzly Seasons, the companion album of photos.

It may be the most unusual — and adventurous — adoption ever attempted. In the spring of 1997, naturalist Charlie Russell and artist Maureen Enns became the proud foster parents of three rambunctious daughters.

But these were no ordinary little girls: they were wild grizzly bear cubs whose mother had been killed by a hunter. And it was no ordinary adoption. Instead of trying to tame the youngsters, the new parents hoped to teach their sharp-clawed “kids” just enough to survive on their own in the rugged wilds of Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula. The NATURE program Walking with Giants: The Grizzlies of Siberia tells the remarkable story of how this human couple went about raising a trio of bears in one of the world’s last great wildernesses. And it highlights how, through a combination of careful study and personal courage, Charlie and Maureen are forcing people to reconsider an age-old image of the grizzly bear as a ferocious man-eater who can’t live in harmony with people. They demonstrate that it is possible to learn to forge a respectful relationship with these seemingly fierce giants.

“We are carefully exploring the question of whether, by treating bears well and with respect, we can create a safe environment for both of us,” says Russell, a former Canadian rancher who has nurtured a lifelong fascination with the powerful predators. “If it is possible to truly understand and live with grizzlies, then it should be of great interest to people all over the world who are responsible for managing and preserving bears in the wild, particularly in areas close to human habitation.”

To many people, grizzlies are symbols of power and ferocity — creatures to be feared and, too often, killed. Indeed, they are awesome animals: capable of weighing 1,500 pounds, standing 10 feet tall, and running more than 30 miles an hour over rough terrain. But Russell, Enns, and others say the big brown bear, known to scientists as Ursus arctos, is too often misunderstood and maltreated. Russell, for one, believes that friction between bears and humans often stems from people’s unthinking treatment of the bears, from hunting and harassing them to feeding them from their cars and trash piles. “Most people fear bears because of a perpetual misunderstanding,” he says, “and bears fear people because of the mistreatment [they] receive due to this misunderstanding.”

Unfortunately, as human settlements have encroached on bear habitats around the world, it has become increasingly difficult to find bears that trust humans. In Europe and the United States, for example, people have all but exterminated bears from most areas: only about an estimated 1,000 bears survive in the lower 48 states, occupying less than one percent of their historic range. Biologists estimate another 40,000 or so grizzlies roam the forests of western Canada and Alaska, but these isolated populations too are beginning to feel human pressure.

But in eastern Asia, biologists believe more than 100,000 grizzlies still lope across the landscape. And some scientists say nowhere on Earth supports a denser and more isolated population of grizzlies than Russia’s rugged, volcano-studded Kamchatka Peninsula. Once, this 100,000-square-mile tongue of land astride the Pacific Ocean was considered a Siberian wasteland. The 19th-century Czars and later the Soviet dictators sent their most feared prisoners here to shiver in the freezing winters and struggle through the ferocious storms and insect hordes of summer.

But in this land of extremes, life also blossoms. Attracted by the millions of salmon that use the peninsula’s streams and lakes to spawn, grizzly bears gather by the hundreds and thousands each spring, summer, and fall to gorge themselves on fresh fish. Readying themselves for their winter sleep, they can eat nearly 100 pounds of food a day — not just fish, but a wide array of berries and other plants as well. Upon seeing this isolated bear kingdom for the first time in 1994, Russell and Enns realized they had found an ideal place to test some of their ideas about learning to coexist with wild bears. In 1996, with permission from Russian authorities, they built a small cabin on Kambalnoe Lake at the southern tip of the Peninsula. Using the cabin as a base camp, they have helped local conservationists monitor local grizzlies and protect them from poachers, traveling across the region by foot, boat, and using a small, home-built float plane piloted by Charlie. Braving the region’s world-famous bad weather, they spent long months observing dozens of nearby bears, learning how to live alongside them as just another inhabitant of the landscape.

As Walking with Giants shows, their careful observations helped the couple develop remarkably intimate relationships with the shy and sometimes playful bears. The two have learned how, when, and where they can approach the animals without alarming them. They have shown that the bears are not necessarily a threat, especially if treated with care. “We have seen some incredible things,” says Russell. Enns, however, stresses neither she nor her partner have thrown caution to the winds. “We don’t sit out there taking unnecessary risks,” she says. “We study the bears carefully and we carry pepper spray” to ward off attacks — though she is happy to report that they have never had to use it. Still, the risks are real. In 1996, for instance, prominent wildlife photographer Michio Hoshino, a veteran grizzly observer, was killed by a 7-year old Kamchatka bear that had become used to eating at a garbage dump and thus lacked the wild bear’s instinct to avoid people.

Russell and Enns hope that what they learn from walking with the giants of Kamchatka will help prevent such tragedies in the future. “We have been able to live beautifully with these animals, with no serious threat, because of what we’ve learned,” Russell says. “Hopefully, sharing what we learn will help people — and be a big help to the bear, too. It is a real problem for any species to be misunderstood.”

The moment Charlie Russell and Maureen Enns saw the three orphans in a Russian zoo, they knew what they had to do.

It was May, 1997, and the couple was visiting the animal park in Petropavlovsk, Kamchatka’s biggest city. There, in a cage, were three female grizzly cubs, recently orphaned when a hunter accidentally killed their mother. “The director of the zoo made it very clear to us that there was a death sentence on [the cubs'] heads,” the couple recall in a diary posted on their Web site. “The zoo had no money to feed them and visitors were throwing food in to them as they played behind the iron bars.”

In a moment, the cubs had “won their hearts,” the pair says. That night “we had a carrying box built for their transport” back to their wilderness cabin. Their plan: reintroduce the cubs into the wild, teaching them the basic skills they would need to survive. In this case, however, there was no manual for the new parents to follow on how to bring up the babies. They would literally be making it up as they went along. As Walking with Giants shows, however, the new family got along just fine. Russell and Enns were careful not to get the cubs, named Chico, Biscuit, and Rosie, too used to humans, instead teaching them to forage on their own and encouraging them to romp and swim independently. They did, however, keep them inside a fenced pen for some time, to protect them from adult bears who might kill the youngsters. By the fall of 1997, however, the bears had grown enough to be ready to spend the winter sleeping — and Charlie watched as they began to build a den. (Despite popular belief, bears do not actually hibernate, which involves a reduced body temperature and pulse rate; rather, they enter winter dormancy, a deep sleep from which they can be awakened, even moving to a new location if they are disturbed.)

The following spring, in 1998, “Charlie met the cubs not long after they came out of their den,” Enns recalls. And by that summer, “we were teaching our cubs to dive for dead fish. We start out in about four feet of water, see a fish on the bottom, and then chuck a rock into the pool and call the cubs over to look down in the water. One of the cubs got right in.”  The couple hopes to find their cubs safe and sound for many years to come. “We are proud of the fact that our cubs are still together,” Enns notes, especially since many experts doubted the pair could successfully reintroduce the animals into the wild. “Eventually,” she says, “we hope to see our cubs have cubs of their own,” which could happen when the bears are four or five years old.

What the future holds for the cubs and Kamchatka’s other grizzlies, however, is uncertain. The collapse of Russia’s economy has crippled many conservation and anti-poaching efforts, leaving the bears more exposed than ever to those who would kill the magnificent creatures for their skin, innards, or bones, body parts that many people believe hold magical or medicinal powers. Luckily, the economic woes have also hampered the poachers, who are having a harder time buying the fuel and equipment they need to invade the bear’s isolated wilderness territory.