This website is no longer actively maintained
Some material and features may be unavailable

Children working on farms at younger ages, report says

A 7-year-old living in the United States may have picked the blueberries in your refrigerator.

Hundreds of thousands of child farmworkers are working in the U.S. at younger ages, for longer hours, and facing greater risks than any other working youth, according to a new report. The  Human Rights Watch report, published this month, documents interviews with 59 children under age 18 who had worked as farmworkers in 14 states in various regions of the United States.

The organization is one of 53 that support a bill pending in Congress called The Children’s Act for Responsible Employment (CARE) Act. The bill would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 and offer child farmworkers the same legal protections as youth in every other industry. Ninety-one co-sponsors support the bill, which has increased from 87 last week; all are Democrats. Many supporters fear the bill will lose significant momentum if not passed by the June recess.

“The United States spends over $25 million a year — more than all other countries combined — to eliminate child labor abroad, yet is tolerating exploitative child labor in its own backyard,” said Zama Coursen-Neff, author of the report. “I saw kids as young as 7 picking blueberries. Eight-year-olds shucking peas in Virginia. Children picking strawberries at 9 in North Dakota.” The report found children as young as 12 legally working more than 10 hours a day.

Current labor laws allow children ages 14 and up to work unlimited hours on a farm, as long as the time is outside of school hours. But a teenager working at McDonald’s can only legally work up to three hours on a school day. Child farmworkers can operate dangerous machinery as early as 16, while the minimum legal age for a lumberjack is 18.

Parental consent is all that’s needed for a child of any age to work on small farms of 10 or fewer employees. The trend in the U.S. according to a 2007 USDA census report, shows that these very small farms make up the majority of U.S. farms and, along with very large farms, are replacing medium size farms at an increasing rate.

The CARE Act would remove exceptions for children working in agriculture. It would amend the minimum legal age of child farmworkers to 16, except for special circumstances approved by the Department of Labor. It would also limit hours children can work on a school day. Work that falls under the Department of Labor’s list of hazardous jobs would have a minimum age requirement of 18. Jobs that would fall under this category would include anything that required operating a tractor or working from a ladder or scaffold at a height of more than 20 feet. Parental consent would no longer overrule labor laws; however, educational groups and children working on their parent’s farms would have special exceptions. Penalties for farm work employers who violate child labor laws would increase. The bill would require more research and data collection on working conditions.

American Farm Bureau, a nongovernmental organization representing farm and ranch families, is one group that opposes the bill. It believes any wide-reaching tightening of child labor laws in agriculture is unnecessary and would bring unintended consequences to the agriculture business.

“When you got to harvest, you have to harvest,” said Ron Gaskill, the group’s senior director of congressional relations. He said Farm Bureau does not see the need for any legal reform, “Over the course of time we have tried to carefully craft the laws and regulations that allow youth to learn, to earn in a safe environment.”

Gaskill grew up working on his family’s apple farm in New York. He says parents should be responsible for protecting their children and says Farm Bureau favors an increase in social services instead. “The change we need to make is that migrant workers need to understand the impact of the work on their child. It’s endemic in migrancy.”

Bill supporters disagree. “What really drives these families to have their kids working out in the fields is the extreme poverty,” said David Strauss, executive director of Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs (AFOP), an organization that supports the bill and has conducted its own field investigations into child farm labor. Since 1997, AFOP has advocated for stronger federal child labor laws.

According to Coursen-Neff’s findings, child farmworkers experience a high risk of repetitive motion injuries and exposure to pesticides. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s website ranks agriculture among the most hazardous industries. And the U.S. Bureau of Labor reported 43 farm-related child deaths between 2005 and 2008.

The report says one-third of child farmworkers do not graduate from high school, many of whom are from migrant families who do not stay in one place long enough to regularly attend school. “Without an education, these kids are entering into a lifetime of poverty,” says Coursen-Neff. She says there is a higher rate of sexual harassment and violence caused by isolating work environments, language differences and many families’ financial dependency on the work.

Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis commended Human Rights Watch for its report. Solis told the Associated Press that the agency has added more than 250 new field investigators in the last year and planned to add even more.

An Environmental Protection Agency spokesperson told the Associated Press that the agency was working to strengthen its assessment of pesticide health risks, in part to improve conditions for child workers, and expected to propose amendments to federal worker protection standards by 2012.

“There is a disconnect today between what we consume and knowing where the stuff in our lives come from,” says Roberto Romano, a filmmaker in production on a feature documentary about U.S. child farmworkers in the U.S. called “The Harvest.” “As Americans where 70 percent of our economy is based on consuming stuff we should know better.”

Read the report:Fields of Peril: Child Labor in U.S. Agriculture

  • thumb
    Main Street: Findlay, Ohio
    Need to Know travels to Ohio to assess how workers are faring after the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs over the past 35 years.
  • thumb
    Following the money: Tax breaks
    New CBO report echoes the findings of Need to Know's "A tale or four tax returns."
  • thumb
      Certifiably employable
    Rick Karr recently visited Seattle to look at a program designed to give the unemployed the skills they need to find jobs in one of the country’s fastest-growing industries.


  • Heather

    Who are the 53 organizations that support the bill? It seems that something as technical as farming requires years of training to have respect for the machinery and the tasks that need to be done. Why would they want to limit those learning opportunities? Limiting that experience definitely seems to take the “family” out of the farm more than any other policy.

  • Julie

    When does “The Harvest” come out? Do they have a website? I’d really like to see this documentary.

  • Alexandra Nikolchev, Researcher

    Thanks for your comments! Heather, the number of organizations supporting the bill has since grown to 93. AFOP keeps a list that they can send out but there is no direct link to it online. Other organizations supporting the bill include NAACP, NCLR, AFT, National PTA and United Farmworkers of America. The bill would allow children younger than 14 to work on their family’s farm and provides exceptions for educational programs, such as 4H, so valuable training would continue for kids of all ages. Julie, “The Harvest” plans to premiere at the end of this year. It doesn’t have a website yet but the official trailer is on vimeo:

  • Dick Fuld II

    Get your hand out of farmers pockets.These kids are just human garbage anyway!

  • Jskoch

    On our ranch it is a pleasure to have our children work with us. They are learning life skills that will take them on an awsome journey through life. I would rather have my children working with on the ranch than out on the street causing trouble. My children have shown livestock in 4-H since they were 8 years old they have loved every minute. This bill is so not needed and would hurt farm and ranch families. Working on a ranch in the good clean enviorment is the best way to raise children. And not all of us own the ranch or farm that we work on, so if this bill were to past it would be harmful to so many families. Children enjoy the work on the ranch and farms.

  • Dbsteens

    Sounds like more government involvement in what families are doing naturally and productively.  Maybe some inspectors need a job so the govt can say they created jobs.  hmmmmm

  • Kevin Smith

    “What really drives these families to have their kids working out in the fields is extreme poverty”  Really?  I earn an excellent living as an electronics designer and our family has operated a farm for 12 years, including a small business based on the farm for the last 7 years.  Starting as young as 7, our kids learned how to plant gardens, feed livestock, train ponies and horses, castrate pigs and goats, milk goats, drive a tractor, build barns, and drive trailers.  But they learned these skills gradually with parental supervision.

    My kids are now 19, 20, and 21, the oldest about to graduate from UT Austin.  They have benefited immeasurably from the experience and although each of them was/is eager to move away as soon as possible, they have learned about themselves, animal science, the environment, hard work, and time management.  These lessons will last them a lifetime and will help in their careers, personal relationships, and shape a sense of independence. 

    The cumulative benefits to hundreds of thousands of Americans who grow up with such an influence far outweighs the occasional unfortunate accident.  It’s impossible to eliminate all risk in every life and the more the well-meaning policy-makers try, the more they make us wards of the state, if not literally, at least psychologically.  As we look to Washington and state legislatures to eliminate all unpleasantness from our lives, we surrender our own self-determination and raise (another) generation of whiny, self-centered, frightened children and adults.

    As for the truly struggling farm families whose kids really do pick blackberries from sun-up to sun-down to help the family sell produce to survive, policies and legislation like this will not give them a better life.  If their argument is that government subsidies to alleviate poverty will keep the kids out of the fields, I’d suggest that children of hard work will fare better than children of government dependence.

  • Crystal Stock
  • Crystal Stock