Financial reform clears Senate, but some say it’s not enough

Photo: Flickr/f-l-e-x

Lawmakers on Thursday approved a landmark financial reform bill that would fundamentally change the way Wall Street is regulated, representing the largest expansion of government oversight in decades.

The bill vastly reshapes federal agencies and creates several more, including a new Financial Services Oversight Council to monitor financial markets and a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, within the Federal Reserve, to police lending.

The bill passed 59-39, with four Republicans joining the Democratic majority in favor. Two Democrats, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and Maria Cantwell of Washington, opposed the measure, saying it did not go far enough.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Feingold wanted the bill to include provisions to bar investment banks from affiliating with retail banks, along the lines of the Glass-Steagall Act, parts of which were repealed in 1999:

“We need to eliminate the risk posed to our economy by ‘too big to fail’ financial firms and to reinstate the protective firewalls between Main Street banks and Wall Street firms,” said Mr. Feingold, who is up for re-election this year. “Ending debate on the bill is finishing before the job is done.”

Mr. Feingold also wants the bill to include additional restrictions, notably on the size and complexity of U.S. banks. Efforts to include specific amendments to address the issue either failed or didn’t get a vote.

The bill passed by the Senate requires derivatives, such as credit-default swaps, to be traded openly on exchanges. As NPR explains, such a system would make it less likely that toxic deals would poison the rest of the financial system:

Requiring trades to go through a central clearinghouse means that if one party to a contract goes bankrupt, the clearinghouse will step in and make good on the deal. Requiring trades to be posted on an exchange means the flow of trades, and the prices, will be available to the public.

The bill also requires banks to spin off their lucrative derivatives units into separate businesses. This is meant to move the risk associated with derivatives away from banks. Opponents of this piece of the measure — which is not included in the House version of the bill — argue that it could push derivatives trading overseas, to less-regulated markets.

The Senate measure also empowers federal officials to take over and dismantle failing financial firms, before the collateral damage from their collapse harms the rest of the economy. But as Mother Jones notes, lawmakers abandoned the idea of a $50 billion emergency fund, which would have provided a form of insurance for such collapses:

The bill gives the government the power to wind down and euthanize banks that somehow do become too-big-to-fail. While a proposed $50 billion fund, paid into by the banks, that would’ve been used to wind down big banks was killed, the bill empowers regulators to wind down and liquidate systemically risky banks. Moreover, those liquidation efforts, as the bill says, would not cost the taxpayers a nickel, unlike the infamous TARP bailout of 2008.

The bill now heads to conference, where lawmakers will hash out differences with a financial reform bill passed by the House earlier this year. See Need to Know’s previous economic coverage for more on the financial crisis and its impact:

 
SUGGESTED STORIES
  • thumb
    Main Street: Findlay, Ohio
    Need to Know travels to Ohio to assess how workers are faring after the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs over the past 35 years.
  • thumb
    Following the money: Tax breaks
    New CBO report echoes the findings of Need to Know's "A tale or four tax returns."
  • thumb
      Certifiably employable
    Rick Karr recently visited Seattle to look at a program designed to give the unemployed the skills they need to find jobs in one of the country’s fastest-growing industries.

Comments

  • Ronald Becker

    Unregulated free markets do not work. Hubris, greed and other undesirable attributes seem to surface in an uncontrolled market.The lessons from the great depression of Robber Barron’s, Con men and Swindlers have been forgotten. Monopolies are now called “Too big to fail ” and are supported by tax payers. Government seems to have lost the moral courage to break them up and to reform Wall Street. The lobbyists seem to be in control to the detriment of the middle class and thanks to the Republicans the reform has lost most of its teeth..

  • Helen Hall

    Your new programme entry to replace “Bill Moyer’s Journal” does not improve with time. PBS is becoming just another “dumbed down” channel offered to the unfortunate American audience. My interest in watching now includes mostly “Masterpiece Theater”. The “commercials” are taking at least 10 – 15 minutes away from even decent programming. Thank goodness for the Internet!

  • mc

    Regulation alone will not help. We had similar regulatory measures earlier in the 1980s. In spite of that many Savings & Loans failed. Periodic Auditing of all the Financial Institutions including Mortgage and Investment Firms must be conducted. Those who committed fraud or violated the regulations should be held accountable and sent to jail. Then only we can see some improvement in these financial institutions. There is no point in talking about ‘too big to fail’ idea.

    Countrywide did the same thing and no one bothered about that. Other Financial Institutions followed Countrywide failed and made every homeowner miserable.
    When the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
    Prevention is better than Cure. Periodic Auditing should help save failing financial institutions and the taxpayers from the big scandal.