Jeffrey Sachs on the Millennium Development Goals

Jeffrey Sachs. Photo: European Parliament

World leaders are convening in New York this week for the 65th General Assembly of the United Nations. International officials will also meet to assess and possibly reevaluate a series of ambitious goals established 10 years ago for improving living conditions in the world’s poorest nations. Those targets, the Millennium Development Goals, have been criticized by many as being unrealistic, and several recent reports have suggested that the U.N. is unlikely to achieve many of them by the original goal of 2015.

To get a sense of why the Millennium Development Goals have achieved so little traction, especially here in the U.S., Need to Know’s Abby Leonard spoke with Dr. Jeffrey Sachs, a renowned economist and special adviser to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. Sachs founded the Millennium Promise Alliance, a non-profit dedicated to achieving the Millennium goals, and until 2006 he served as the director of the United Nations Millennium Project. He is currently also a professor of sustainable development and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University.

Abby Leonard: These goals were put in place 10 years ago but it seems like we haven’t heard much about them since then. What progress has been made?

Jeffrey Sachs: The goals are not well known to say the least in the U.S. You often go weeks or months without hearing about them from our politicians. But to the surprise of many people, they have become the organizing principle for development in countries throughout the world.

Leonard: Do Americans simply lack the appetite for international causes?

Sachs: It’s the American leadership that has not played the role it should be playing and that leaders in other countries have been playing. You don’t hear about [the millennium goals] from Obama, and you didn’t hear about them from Bush or Clinton, so Americans just don’t know about them. I believe myself that there’s a great deal more interest and engagement among Americans than our politicians recognize. When they do pursue them, like Bush’s initiatives to fight AIDS, there is a positive response from Americans. And they do ask good hard questions – will it really work? It’s not opposition, just scrutiny and common sense.

It’s not an accident that the U.S. ranks lowest of all major donor countries in the world — that is the share of our income that goes to development aid. Americans will ask whether, because were so generous privately, that makes up the difference. But it doesn’t. We still rank far below other countries. We go months at a time, years at a time, without hearing about this. Whereas in the UK, all the major candidates for prime minister made great efforts to make clear that they support the Millennium Development Goals.

Leonard: How will this week’s summit — and its resulting report document –  affect the followthrough on those goals?

Sachs: It’s a very fine document, with lots of nice sentiments, but like many such rhetorical documents, it’s not an action plan. What needs to come out of this meeting is a translation of commitments from donor countries into the kind of actions that can truly support the acceleration. In every major area, there are very practical things promised, and if there is followthrough, there will be breakthroughs.

Leonard: Can you point to areas of success that prove these programs are worth continuing?

Sachs: There’s been a lot of progress. Ten years ago, [Africa] was a continent basically in war: Liberia, Sierra Leone, the Horn of Africa. Now, most of these war zones are at least in a fragile way, quiet. Economic growth has increased rather considerably from 0 to negative in the ‘90s to positive 5 or 6 percent in this decade. So there’s been a lot of progress.

The Millennium Development Goals point the way. We still need basic infrastructure and China’s been financing a great deal of infrastructure there. The point is to make all of this much more systematic, to have a real investment plan that enables governments to say, within the next five years here’s a power grid and a health system put in place with the help of partner financing.

Leonard: China has been accused of neocolonialism in Africa. Is that fair?

Sachs: I think it’s without merit. China’s doing a tremendous job helping Africa to develop. I think some traditional donors are saying, “What’s China doing there?” They say China’s getting concessions for minerals and oil. But there’s a lot of competition for that, and other countries and companies are winning their share.

Of course, China’s a new donor, and this is its first time doing it at this scale, taking on some of these big projects. There’s been learning around best ways to do this. For a while, China brought all workers from China; now they are hiring locals. Those are inevitable adjustment realities. China’s playing an important role – first as a buyer of resources, second as an investor of commercial capital and third as development donor.

Leonard: Why is it so difficult to motivate people in donor countries to push for the completion of the goals?

Sachs: There are politics at play. For example, I find the politics around education shocking and simply not understandable. There is almost no international financial support for it. Everyone knows education’s important, but no one wants to support it. I would’ve said that one’s easy, AIDS will be difficult. But the scale up for AIDS actually came first.

The world waxes and wanes with enthusiasm for one of the goals or another. This year, maternal and child health are getting particular attention. We have no shortage of resources on this planet. If you want to find them, then rein in the military budgets, the tax-free accounts of billionaires or the bonuses of Wall Street bankers. The balance isn’t even remotely correct.

 
SUGGESTED STORIES
  • thumb
    Main Street: Findlay, Ohio
    Need to Know travels to Ohio to assess how workers are faring after the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs over the past 35 years.
  • thumb
    Following the money: Tax breaks
    New CBO report echoes the findings of Need to Know's "A tale or four tax returns."
  • thumb
      Certifiably employable
    Rick Karr recently visited Seattle to look at a program designed to give the unemployed the skills they need to find jobs in one of the country’s fastest-growing industries.

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremiah-Johnson/100000422275316 Jeremiah Johnson

    “We have no shortage of resources on this planet. If you want to find them, then reign in the military budgets, the tax-free accounts of billionaires or the bonuses of Wall Street bankers. The balance isn’t even remotely correct.” I couldn’t have said it better.

  • Eric

    Taking away money from people who earned it to give to those that didn’t is never a winning proposition.

  • Rebecca_rocks

    The U.S. citizens should contribute by charity if they like. It is not the gov’t's job to take our money and give it wherever they want.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-Druesedow/516366456 Stephen Druesedow

    I have been following the millenial goals since I read about them in the september 2005 issue of scientific american. I think the UN should definitely have goals for development in the world and that all the nations should contribute to these goals or the good of all. The reason I think Obama, Bush, and Clinton don’t mention them is because America, as the military leader in the world does not want to lend very much legitimacy to the UN, lest it should lose any of it’s own. This is how governments work, they are generally selfish. I think the goals are generally good goals, and in 2005 might have seemed reachable. You just have to plot the trajectory of development in all of these areas in order to create an achievable goal. I agree that a goal shouldn’t be set if it isn’t achievable, and right now, Goal 1, eradicate extreme hunger and poverty — by cutting in half the number of people who live on less than 1$ a day and the proportion of those who suffer from extreme hunger. Well so this is the most important goal for the UN. Eradicating extreme hunger
    and poverty. I would say, first eradicate hunger, then poverty. Don’t make your main goal a divided thing. Hunger is more important than poverty. In the scientific american it shows generally that in sub saharan africa, near east, latin america, south asia, and east asia, the average daily caloric intake is slowly but steadily increasing in all of these areas. Well this is good news, but the goal has to first of all be targeted toward one aspect, not two at the same time, and then is has to be in line with the trajectory of development to be achievable. It looks like it went up about 100 calories in each of these areas over the course of 15 years. But what can the UN do to help?
    Set goals, measure trajectories sure, but what action can it take to encourage the achievement of the goals?

  • Jeremy

    Nice Eric. Spoken like a person with a huge sense of entitlement and little appreciation for the combination of circumstances that have resulted in their good fortune.

  • Jeremy

    Nice Eric. Spoken like a person with a huge sense of entitlement and little appreciation for the combination of circumstances that have resulted in their good fortune.

  • Jeremy

    Nice Eric. Spoken like a person with a huge sense of entitlement and little appreciation for the combination of circumstances that have resulted in their good fortune.

  • Jiangliping0302

    Burberry Bags On Sale can women’s handbags always record the personal Designer Handbags status of a woman coldly. So what he chooses his pocket for each beautiful eyebrow is absolutely discount handbags no evidence in their own external models as well as intrinsic self-synthesis, Below
    the LV handbags wholesaler model of 15 pockets, spring summer are new Gucci handbags wholesaler designs more recently, at
    the Prada handbags wholesalersame time allows you to create the popular tide arrogance, also lets you select a section in the package from the hand of Kiel of design that is combined with natural gas field own summary,
    regardless of LV handbags wholesaler whether it is the small shoulder shoulder large pocket,Burberry Handbags UK night banquet
    is the wholesale handbags Tudor pocket scale,nba Jerseys binds to theindividuality of metal full of grace buckle pocket, so women can agile style,lovely attention to two real Mike is the use of extremely Jan, has written brilliant styling,stunning beauty, the popular art, the fresh flavor is full.

    NBA jersey seems simple and plain style which doesn’t lose its blaze and flashes with nba Jerseys different values in different people’s eyes!youth basketball jerseys The Designer of pandora bracelets Changed In players’eyes,nhl Jerseys it symbolizes their locations on court and embodies the position of the team; in the eyes of club bosses, its sale is the source of profits.nba Jerseys In the fan’eyes, sports jerseysit is symbol of their idols. It is a dream come true to have nfl jerseys sale the jerseys of their idols;mlb Jerseys And in the eyes of the science and technology workers,nfl Jerseys Wholesale its texture needs to be revamped, and the styles need to be diversified.Style Provided at Low Price!nfl Jerseys Cheap Get links of london sale for Nephews!

  • marvinetta

    It is shocking and embarrassing that so few efforts in this country are directed toward the Millennium Development Goals. Well, Global Girls, refuses to sit on the sidelines and complain. We are educating all of our program participants on the goals this year and will select one to act on by the end of June.