As White House tackles obesity, lawmakers eye soda as culprit

Is the soda tax making a comeback?

After an initial wave of interest last year, lawmakers across the country backed away from the idea, fearing public anger over the economy. Congress shelved a proposal to pay for health care reform with a soda tax. Legislative leaders in Mississippi quashed the idea. And New York Gov. David Paterson, one of the most vocal advocates of a tax on soda, was rebuffed by the state legislature two years in a row.

Now, a White House task force on childhood obesity has suggested that states might experiment with taxing soda as a way to curb consumption, and advocates of the idea are claiming renewed momentum. Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter is pushing aggressively for a similar measure, and lawmakers in California are mulling a proposal that would peg the rate of the tax to the amount of sugar in a given beverage.

Lawmakers who support a tax on soda have been cheered on by public health officials, who say curbing the consumption of carbonated beverages would help hold down skyrocketing rates of obesity, especially among children. According to a recent study in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 16 percent of children and adolescents ages 10 to 17 were obese. That’s a 10 percent rise from 2003.

Doctors have fingered soda as one of the prime culprits.

“They’re the single greatest source of added sugar in the American diet,” said Kelly Brownell, director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University, in a telephone interview. “They’re very aggressively promoted, and the body doesn’t seem to handle calories very well when they’re in liquid.”

Brownell, who compares the fight against soda to that against tobacco, said that about 15 states and cities are currently mulling taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages.

Because soda is cheap and widely available, children incorporate it into their diets early. If you make it harder for families to buy soda, doctors say, you can develop healthier eating habits at younger ages, when it matters most. Of children who are obese at ages 10 to 15, 80 percent remain obese when they turn 25, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Cutting down on childhood obesity means cutting down on obesity overall, and potentially saving hundreds of billions of dollars in medical costs.

The problem is especially widespread in low-income neighborhoods, where options for healthy eating are slim. In New York City, for example, twice as many blacks and Latinos reported drinking soda on a daily basis as whites, according to a report in the Journal of Urban Health. The report’s authors added that differences in soda consumption “mirror disparities in obesity and other chronic diseases.”

And parents are well aware of the problem. When researchers from the HSC Foundation, a non-profit health care system for people with disabilities and chronic illnesses, asked a focus group of black and Latino parents how they could best encourage healthy eating habits, one of their responses was blunt: “Stop drinking soda.”

But the beverage industry has spent millions in an effort to kill proposals in Congress and in state and local legislatures to tax soda. And in that campaign, they have won some unlikely allies. Lawmakers who represent districts with large black and Latino populations have expressed reservations about the proposal, calling it “regressive” because it disproportionately affects the poor.

“Americans are smart. They know a money grab when they see it,” Susan Neely, president and CEO of the American Beverage Association, said in March. “The public doesn’t buy that a tax is going to solve a problem as complex as obesity. Taxes like these are highly regressive, hurting the most those who can least afford it.”

Whether the White House report will spark a national revival is uncertain. Passing any new tax will likely be unpopular in the current political climate. And advocates of the idea, including Brownell, admit that a tax on soda might hit low-income populations harder. Brownell argued, though, that the soda companies themselves have targeted those communities in their advertising campaigns.

“For the industry to turn around and express concern for the poor seems pretty duplicitous to me,” Brownell said, adding that, while an excise on soda might be a regressive tax, “Obesity is a regressive disease.”

 
SUGGESTED STORIES

Comments

  • pat

    And Big Macs and Whoppers have nothing to do with the obesity epidemic?? How about chocolate??? What about beer??? Are these all things that are going to be banned next??

  • donna

    What about diet soda? They’d tax Coke, but not not Diet Coke, etc.? Which goes to a whole other question/argument – Is the sweetner(s) in diet soda better than sugar or not?

  • Steven

    I drink very little soda pop. So, I’m for taxing the heck out of it just like non-smokers want to tax the heck out of cigarettes to fund healthcare It should be taxed at least at the rate alcoholic beverages are taxed. It won’t affect my pocket book and I will benefit from the tax.
    Better yet, put an excise tax on sugar and the cost can be shared by consumers who buy products made with sugar.

  • John W.

    Soda is the perfect formula for obesity. Why? Because sugars and syrups in soda are turned directly into fat by the liver. The phosphoric acid impairs the body’s ability to reject excess amounts of sugar being ingested, which sodas contain can for can. Soda can also be a contributor to pancreatic cancer. It’s disastrous to diabetics. Don’t just fuss about the tax – be concerned about your health.

  • Ana

    All junk food should be highly taxed….sugars, saturated fat, sodium….. I have a 5 year old, and he is tought to eat healty at school, but at lunch time the school feeds him pizza, hot dogs, burgers, and alike. So where is the healthy food they talk about????

  • Janie

    Soda is not the only culprit for obesity….processed food, in general, also contributes to obesity and hypertension….fast food as well.

    Soda has been taxed going back to the 70s. I propose people stop drinking soda and let the soda industry go out of business.

  • john

    This article and several comments continuously refer to soda as a sugar sweetened beverage. This is incorrect, and slightly misleading. Most (about 95%) of sodas are sweetened with high fructose corn syrup, not cane sugar, because it is a cheaper ingredient.

    High frustose corn syrup (HFCS) is in a lot of stuff.Americans consume an average of about 70 lbs. of HFCS per person per year. And here’s a secret: corn syrup is responsible for the rise in obesity, not sugar. See, the particular “sugar” that is in HFCS, fructose, actually promotes overeating by not allowing your brain to realize that your stomach is full. Hunger is controlled by a balance of hormones, and HFCS throws these hormones off track.

    Some people mention diet soda; I’m not even going to get into the carcinogenic properties of artificial sweeteners.

    There are plenty of sodas available with cane sugar rather than corn syrup; they take a bit more trouble to find and don’t usually have a recognizable brand on them, but they taste fantastic.

    Sometimes I also like to mix concentrated fruit juice and club soda.

    Ultimately though, chemical consumption notwithstanding, the LARGEST and PRIMARY source of obesity, especially childhood obesity, is a plain and simple lack of self control, from habits learned by watching mom and dad, because in MODERATION, these problems are very minimal. This lack of good judgement is actually the single greatest threat to the health of the general public; a pandemic if you will, and should really be addressed.

  • Dawn W

    While I agree that soda is bad for a person (I recently got off the stuff myself and think it can be just as addictive as any drug including withdrawal symptoms when stopping) but I don’t believe it is the sole reason for obesity in children or otherwise. My own daughter is currently on a new restricted diet because she is overweight. My kids aren’t allowed to have soda and my daughter won’t even drink it when offered (such as at school parties). I don’t understand why schools are encouraged to teach children to eat healthy and excersize but they don’t offer healthy foods and a lot of schools have even taken gym class out of the curriculum. Maybe that curriculum should get an overhall not just taxing anything and everything that can possibly be taxed in order to teach parents not to give it to their children.

  • http://camping61.com/ luwinski

    Hunger is controlled by a balance of hormones, and HFCS throws these hormones off track.Is the sweetner(s) in diet soda better than sugar or not?
    ...................................................................................................

  • http://www.fdfdkivklhggrsdf-g.co Kevin Juncaj

    You made various fine points there. I did a search on the topic and found the majority of persons will consent with your blog.

  • http://www.fosssokoritplko.info Kenia Stas

    I have been examinating out many of your articles and i can state pretty good stuff. I will make sure to bookmark your blog.

  • http://trac.python.it/sito/ticket/2130 Wasserbetten

    I appreciate an individual taking the time to share them with us all.

  • kirstin<3

    Mhmm…