The Daily Need

Renewed push to curb insider trading in Congress after ’60 Minutes’ exposé

With public approval of Congress at an all-time low this year, a recent “60 Minutes” report shining a light on insider trading among members of Congress elicited outrage among an already disillusioned public. But the report has also spurred a renewed focus on banning the practice among members of Congress, which has been gaining momentum in recent weeks.

The “60 Minutes” investigation (which originally aired on November 13), based on the recent book “Throw Them All Out” by conservative-leaning author Peter Schweizer, alleged that several members of Congress in both parties had benefited from lucrative stock trades based on non-public information obtained on Capitol Hill. In the report, Schweizer alleged that members of Congress had been involved in several trades that posed serious conflicts of interest, including trades in health-care stocks during the 2009 health care debate and shorting stocks in the days preceding the 2008 global financial crisis.

In the House, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, originally introduced in 2004 by Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) and Rep. Tim Walz (R-Minn), has been reintroduced every session but has failed to garner enough co-sponsorship or support to push the bill through. However, in recent weeks, the STOCK Act has surged in popularity and has attracted more than 150 co-sponsors willing to endorse the bill.

Anti-insider trading legislation is also making headway in the Senate. Just two days following the report, Senator Scott Brown (R-Mass) introduced a bill explicitly banning members of Congress from engaging in insider trading and requiring them to report all securities exchanges of more than $1,000 within 60 days. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) followed suit shortly afterward with her own version of the bill, although her version has faced sharp criticism from observers who say the language contains a number of serious flaws that prevent its effectiveness. Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn) has pushed for a Senate committee vote to take place in mid-December, and requested that the Gillibrand and Brown versions of the bill be consolidated into one.

At a hearing last week held by the House Financial Services Committee, some witnesses argued that current laws against insider trading already apply to members of Congress, rendering new legislation unnecessary. However, Lieberman said that existing law “is not as clear as it needs to be.”

 
SUGGESTED STORIES
  • thumb
    Five ‘Stand Your Ground’ cases you should know about
    Although Florida was the first to enact a Stand Your Ground law, 24 other states enforce similar versions. ProPublica highlights some of the most notable cases where a version of the Stand Your Ground law has led to freedom from criminal prosecution.
  • thumb
    The politics of punishment
    Marc Mauer, author and executive director of The Sentencing Project, talks to NTK's Tamy Cozier about prison growth and reform in the U.S.
  • thumb
    New task force eyes 'big fish'
    Could a day of reckoning be coming for the people most responsible for the subprime mortgage disaster?

Comments

  • sumflow

    Congress hampers adequate enforcement of the securities laws, by refusing prompt public disclosure, the same as corporate America. The laws apply, but are unenforceable against elected public officials, because they refuse to disclose information in the time permitted for everybody else. 

    The delayed reporting of securities transactions, defeats, obstructs, and impairs its use as timely evidence. If you let this STOCK act with long 90 day reporting times pass, it will just confirm what the people already suspect about a double standard for congressional insider trading.

  • Klmt Des

    I feel that members of congress are not in favour of reforms to that would prevent them from insider trading and lining their own pockets and see themselves as above the laws that apply to all of the citizens they should be all voted out as they do not deserve to be serving the public. The media should be also do more investigative reporting to keep the public better informed of the  behavior of our elected representatives .