Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
Logo
On Out Own Terms: Moyers on Dying
Choosing Death: The Debate end



The Debate Home

Support for PAS

PAS and End-of-Life Care

PAS and Terminal Sedation

PAS and Suffering

What's Next

Biography

Print Page

Close Window


Question
Dr. Timothy Quill Dr. Ira Byock
Requires Real Player
Yes, definitely. Technically, terminal sedation is using aggressive medical means to help the patient escape from the suffering by being sedated, and often withdrawing any life-sustaining devises such as a ventilator or intravenous feeding. Many people believe it to be ethically preferable to physician-assisted suicide.

It's interesting, however, that there is another distinction between physician-assisted suicide and terminal sedation, which cuts opposite the usual analysis. If you ask by whose hand is the patient being assisted, in terminal sedation, it is the healthcare team who's in charge. Whereas in physician-assisted suicide, you arguably could say it is the patient who ultimately must take or not take the medication. So there is that safeguard in physician-assisted suicide that is not provided in terminal sedation.

From my perspective, terminal sedation represents the continuum of palliative care, and when it is needed, it is incumbent on us as clinicians to be able to provide that full continuum. Otherwise, patients will be left to suffer unnecessarily, and frankly often, to die in physical agony. In such circumstances, it is not only acceptable, it is probably requisite that we offer it and, unless patients refuse it, sedation ought to be made readily available.

We as a society have given physicians certain powers that other members of society don't have. There must be certain constraints on physicians authority to to write prescriptions and to minister to patients. We are not to prescribe lethal injections or lethal medications to patients, even when patients may request assisted suicide-- seeing it as preferable to terminal sedation. The meaning of those actions and what they represent in terms of our social responsibility to the patient are very different. Even when faced with a suffering patient who is making repeated requests to end his or her life, there are some things as a doctor that I simply cannot do.

I worry that when we accede to the requests of patients to give them a lethal prescription, the suffering that we're alleviating is our own. In terminal sedation, that's not the case. It remains a round-the-clock, emotionally and physically exhausting exercise for physicians, medical workers and caregivers.






Copyright 2000, Educational Broadcasting Corporation/Public Affairs Television, Inc.

 




On Our Own Terms - Moyers on DyingThirteen/WNET New YorkPBS Online