Episcopal Convention Report

BOB ABERNETHY, Anchor: After decades of debate and division, the US Episcopal Church this week said overwhelmingly that gays and lesbians are eligible to become bishops or serve in any other ordained ministry of the church. At their General Convention, Episcopal leaders also moved toward developing an official rite for blessing same-sex unions. These decisions are likely to widen the divide between Episcopalians and the worldwide 77-million-member Anglican Communion of which they are a part. Kim Lawton has our special report from Anaheim, California.

KIM LAWTON: At their meeting in Anaheim this week, Episcopal bishops, clergy, and lay representatives tackled a host of social issues, from global poverty to justice for Disneyland hotel workers. But the most divisive topic, once again, was homosexuality.

REV. IAN DOUGLAS (Episcopal Divinity School): It wouldn’t be a meeting of the Episcopal Church or the Anglican Communion if we didn’t somehow engage matters of human sexuality.

LAWTON: Despite concerns from many global Anglican partners, convention delegates overwhelmingly voted to move ahead on two of the most contentious questions: whether to ordain gay bishops and whether to bless same-sex unions. On the issue of gay bishops, the delegates asserted that “God has called and may call gays and lesbians to any ordained ministry in the Episcopal Church.” The vote effectively ends a de facto moratorium that was approved three years ago, although it does not guarantee that more gay bishops will be consecrated.

Separately, the delegates also voted to move forward in developing liturgies for blessing same-sex relationships. The issue will be taken up again at the next General Convention in 2012. In the meantime, the measure allows local clergy leeway in blessing same-gender relationships, especially in states where gay marriage is legal.

Reverend Susan Russell is the outgoing president of Integrity, a group that works for the full inclusion of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgendered people in the Episcopal Church.

REV. SUSAN RUSSELL (Integrity): I think the overwhelming message coming out of this convention, not only for LGBT people but for all who are looking for a community that that embraces peace, justice, tolerance, compassion, and the good news of God in Christ Jesus, is that the Episcopal Church welcomes you.

LAWTON: The measures passed in part because many conservative Episcopalians have left the denomination. Those remaining feel increasingly isolated.

BISHOP WILLIAM LOVE (Diocese of Albany, at press conference): It is very sad for me because I am a lifelong Episcopalian, I’m a lifelong Anglican, but first and foremost I am a lifelong Christian, and it is breaking my heart to see the church destroying itself in the manner in which we seem to be doing.

LAWTON: Many delegates here said they voted for the direction they believe God is calling their church to go in. But those votes pose new challenges for a global Communion that has already been strained close to a breaking point. There’s a lot riding on how what happened here gets interpreted around the world.

Many Anglicans, especially in Africa, Asia, and South America, were outraged in 2003 when the Episcopal Church approved the consecration of New Hampshire Bishop Gene Robinson, the church’s first openly gay bishop. An emergency Communion report called on the US to ban on any future consecrations of gay bishops until an international consensus emerges.

The Communion’s spiritual leader, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, attended this meeting before the controversial votes took place.

ARCHBISHOP ROWAN WILLIAMS: Along with many in the Communion, I hope and pray that there won’t be decisions in the coming days that could push us further apart.

LAWTON: Much of this week’s debate centered on balancing Communion concerns with a desire to move forward.

BISHOP GENE ROBINSON: I believe with my whole heart that we all know where this is going to wind up. It is going to wind up with the full inclusion of all of God’s children in God’s church.

BISHOP PETER BECKWITH: I would concede that if indeed that it is the right thing to do, we should do it now. I do not believe it is the right thing to do.

BISHOP NATHAN BAXTER: While I am very, very much concerned about our covenant with the Communion and our mission, I am also concerned about our covenant with our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters.

BISHOP SHANNON JOHNSTON: The Communion, for me, is too much to lose. There is too much at stake with mission and our ability to apprehend larger, wider truths that go way beyond our own small church and setting in the Western world.

LAWTON: Shannon Johnston, coadjutor bishop in the Diocese of Virginia, said he personally supported the gay ordination resolution, but voted against it because he didn’t want to further divide the Communion.

JOHNSTON (Diocese of Virginia): It was quite wrenching, because it took two of the core values of the church and juxtaposed them against each other, mission and inclusivity on the one hand and then the unity of the church on the other, which is no less a core value of the Gospel.

LAWTON: Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori said her church is not fomenting division.

BISHOP KATHARINE JEFFERTS SCHORI: Schism is not a Christian act.

LAWTON: The approved resolutions reasserted the Episcopal Church’s desire to remain an active member of the Anglican Communion. But Bishop Jon Bruno of the Diocese of Los Angeles says that doesn’t mean total agreement with overseas churches about homosexuality.

BISHOP JON BRUNO (Diocese of Los Angeles): I think I would explain it to them that the context that we live in is totally different and that they have to be tolerant of our context as well as we are tolerant of their context. I still want to be in relationship with them fully.

LAWTON: Reverend Ian Douglas, a representative from Massachusetts, described the votes as being honest with the rest of the world about what the Episcopal Church stands for.

DOUGLAS: There’s no Communion without genuine relationship, and there’s no genuine relationship without truth-telling. So I see commitments to being in Communion and telling the truth about who we are as being of a whole.

LAWTON: Conservative Anglicans already don’t like what they’re hearing.

BISHOP DAVID ANDERSON (American Anglican Council): I think it signals to the rest of the Communion, the Anglican Communion, that the Episcopal Church wants to be a member only on its own terms, and that if terms are applied to it, then they will go their own way and have things the way they wish, and others can be with them or not.

LAWTON: David Anderson is among the Episcopalians who left the denomination over theological issues. He was ordained a bishop in the Anglican Church of Kenya. Disaffected Episcopalians, including four breakaway dioceses, have formed a rival jurisdiction called the Anglican Church in North America. They’re seeking recognition from the Archbishop of Canterbury.

ANDERSON: I see that as The Episcopal Church continues to go through these earthquakes of adopting things there is going to be a constant stream of both people and churches, perhaps more dioceses, that wind up leaving and coming over into the rest of the Anglican Communion.

LAWTON: But at the same time, many Episcopalians believe their actions here will help bring in other people who may have felt alienated in the past. Both sides say they’re anxious to focus on mission rather than division. I’m Kim Lawton in Anaheim, California.

  • Bob Chapman

    The “moratorium” was not lifted. Resolution 2006-B033 was not mentioned in Resolution 2009-D025. Please don’t spread a limited group of people’s private agenda.

  • robroy

    The denomination is trying to spin the outcome as fast as they can because of the negative reactions pouring in from the rest of the Communion. Ms Schori sent out a letter to Archbishop Williams and to the rest of the primates saying that the moratoria were NOT overturned. Listen to what the liberal bishop of Olympia said (who voted for both resolutions): “Third, this resolution does, in fact, open up access once again to gay and lesbian people, to the discernment process for the episcopate. To interpret this any other way would be dishonest.” Listen to what Integrity, USA said: “We came to this convention committed to moving the church beyond B033 and forward on equality for the blessing of same-sex unions–and we are beyond gratified that we have realized both of those goals.”

    Hmmm, Bp Rickels and Integrity are saying that Ms Schori just lied to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the rest of the primates. Nice.

  • Clint Davis

    To categorize B033 as a moratorium is misleading and simplistic. B033 asked the Church to exercise restraint when selecting a bishop, and never said that partnered gay bishops are disallowed. D029 takes up the other half of that equation and says frankly that such ordinations are in fact allowed and do happen, regardless of an attitude of restraint or lack thereof.

  • SCinPA

    D025 declares the Episcopal Church an inclusive church. I am so proud to be an Episcopalian, and proud of Katharine, our Presding Bishop. I am glad that this message was broadcast to the world. I hope GLBT’s who are looking for a spiritual home give the Episcopal Church a chance. They are welcome here!
    And if the Anglican Communion doesn’t like Episcopal Church’s ways- so be it! It’s not our fault that the AC is behind the times, heck- women STILL aren’t allowed to become bishops in the UK!

  • V. Sheldon

    robroy, i have been on at least 7 different news sites and have read 7 different negative,defamous comments made by a certain rob roy (with apropriate name variations)
    May i make a suggestion: run don’t walk to your nearest ACNA parish and pledge lifelong fidelity and leave the other 2 million of us to get on with the business of TEC. If you do not like the belief where you are- leave.

  • Jean Webb

    I do not want to see the church SPLIT.I am a conservative elder and believe that we cannot depart from the Bible and our church principles and beliefs that are eons old.I do not judge the sex preferences of others, but I do have a problem with leadership positions where a person sets himself in a position that is misleading.We need to follow the teachings of Jesus.We can do this and still reach out to those who are different—but let them remain different, but not lead! May the Lord bless us and keep us Christions.

  • David Dehner

    The Family remains together and the mystery of human sexuality remains a mystery rather than a certainty. What we now know that we did not realize before is that human sexuality is not a matter of choice but a matter of creation in every way. So if we believe that God created all then we must follow that belief to the natural conclusion of inclusion because of God’s mystery, not our prejudice. Please pray for those who do not agree with you and invite as many into the conversation as you can, for it is in conversation that conversion takes place, by God’s good grace, not our choosing.

  • Susan Russell

    What the church did was move us beyond the defacto moratorium on the election of another openly gay or lesbian bishop by returning us to our canons — which include sexual orientation as one of the things we are not to discriminate against in ordination processes. How individual bishops and standing committees choose to vote regarding consents when the next LGBT bishop is elected remains to be seen. What IS true is that we as a church said in Anaheim that we are prepared to move forward in mission in spite of our differences on sexuality. And that should be good news for anybody committed to unity in diversity and the proclamation of the Good News of the God who loves absolutely everybody!

  • Daniel Crockett

    B033 was never a moratorium, only a half-hearted attempt to placate the traditionalists,the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the conservative Primates. Of the three, only the Archbishop seems to have found any real kind of satisfaction in B033. These recent resolutions passed handily,not because they necessarily speak for Episcopalians rank and file, but because those who inhabit General Convention are overwhelmingly one-sided in their support of gay marriage and ordinations. And there is no mandate that delegates to GC should represent the will of their constituency. However, as the Epsicopal Church grows smaller by about 5% yearly, due to an aging population and defection of traditional members, it may well come to pass that, “This is where the church is at.” And it may be that the homosexual community has been aching for a Christian spiritual home, and will come flocking into this radically made-over bastion of WASP society, and all will be well for those of us who are being dragged down a very bumpy road.

  • jonesy

    interesting commentary daniel #9. v.sheldon,some of us were lifelong episcopalians who never asked for this revision, others went through confirmation voluntarily. although i wholeheartedly embrace the environmental stewardship aspect of your new religion, i have absolutely nothing else in common with your church. i finally had to leave but that doesn’t mean it still doesn’t break my heart. and i would seriously doubt TEC has 2 mil active parishioners anymore…i would sure like to see concrete numbers of that.

  • François-Marie Arouet

    I am basically secular. I only get dragged into a church for christenings, Confirmations, weddings, and Funerals. I feel little need for organized religion. My major desire is that Religionists, who tend to be socially Conservative, stay out of
    the public sphere and stop trying to impose their morality on everyone. Now my second wish I think is that militant social radicals would leave the Religious alone to practice their faith unmolested. Religion does not belong in Government, but Government and government policy should not be imposed in a church. It bothers me to see the socially conservative try to bully the secular world, it also dismays me to see militant
    cultural radicals bully socially conservative people in their places of worhip.