Tea Party and Religious Conservatives


KIM LAWTON, correspondent: The Tea Party movement has been on the march this election season with its message of reclaiming America through limited government, fiscal responsibility, and a free market. At rallies across the country, Tea Party activists reverently invoke the Founding Fathers and the Constitution. The focus is firmly on economics, with no mention of hot-button social issues like abortion or gay marriage. Yet the Tea Party has had great appeal for religious conservatives.

REV C.L. BRYANT (Adjunct Fellow, FreedomWorks): It is the people in our congregations who pay the taxes. That’s what makes it religious.

LAWTON: Rev. C.L. Bryant is a Baptist pastor from Louisiana and an adjunct fellow with FreedomWorks, one of the leading Tea Party grassroots groups. Before the Tea Party march in Washington, DC last month, Bryant led an optional nondenominational prayer service on the Mall.

post01-teapartyBRYANT: Our rights don’t come from Republicans. Our rights don’t come from Democrats. Our rights come from our Creator. That’s where God comes in, and God has always been in the mix when we talk about America.

LAWTON: There have been longstanding tensions in American politics between fiscal conservatives and social conservatives. Tea Party leaders emphasize that theirs is a secular grassroots conservative movement. But significant involvement from religious right activists has raised new questions about whether those tensions have been overcome and what agenda will take priority after the election.

PROFESSOR MARK ROZELL (George Mason University): There are a lot of Tea Party activists who I would characterize as much more libertarian in bent than socially conservative. They’re really concerned about big government and reducing government size and scope in our society more than they’re interested in the social issues agenda. But there are other Tea Party activists who combine both fiscal and social conservatism.

REV. RICHARD CIZIK (New Evangelical Partnership): The Tea Party leadership that’s libertarian and the conservative Republican evangelicals who don’t like Obama—they have an agreement here. But what I would say to the evangelicals who have joined this movement: be careful, you will be used.

LAWTON: According to a new survey from the Public Religion Research Institute, 11 percent of Americans consider themselves part of the Tea Party movement, and 47 percent of them are Christian conservatives.

post05-teapartyREP. MICHELE BACHMANN (R-Minnesota, speaking at Values Voter Summit): As for me, I prefer tea parties, just so you know.

LAWTON: The Tea Party had a highly visible role at the Values Voter Summit in Washington last month, an annual gathering of religious conservatives that always gives strong emphasis to social issues like abortion and gay marriage. One of the most popular speakers was South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint, a favorite at many Tea Party rallies.

SEN. JIM DEMINT (R-South Carolina): The fact is you cannot be a real fiscal conservative if you do not understand the value of having a culture that’s based on values.

LAWTON: During one panel discussion, several local Tea Party activists said it was their Christian faith that compelled them to get involved with the movement.

KATY ABRAM (Tea Party Activist): For about two weeks, I woke up about 3:00 in the morning every morning, and I’m really convinced that it was God speaking to me every single night.

LAWTON: Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, a sponsor of the Values Voter Summit, says there is a natural overlap between his movement and the Tea Party.

post03-teapartyTONY PERKINS (President, Family Research Council): I’m not trying to turn the Tea Party into, you know, what we do, and they are not trying to turn us into what they do. We complement one another, and we work together because we have a common vision of responsible government, individual responsibility, and a stable society.

LAWTON: Perkins says social conservatives who are part of the Tea Party haven’t abandoned their core issues. It’s just that in this election, concerns about the economy have taken center stage.

PERKINS: When you look at government spending, rising debt, government expansion, takeovers, I mean, people they’re frightened, they’re scared, they’re frustrated, they’re angry. But there’s also the underlying values issues, the moral issues. For values voters it may be on the screen about the economy, but running in the back is where do these candidates, where do these parties stand on life, on marriage, on family?

LAWTON: Still, some evangelical leaders are uncomfortable with the current emphasis on economics.

REV. RUSSELL MOORE (Dean, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary): I think there are some issues that are transcendent and are more important than other issues. The right to life for the unborn is infinitely more important than the question of how high one’s taxes should be.

post04-teapartyCIZIK: I’m opposed to deficits, too, but that’s not what primarily drives me as an evangelical Christian. Limited government? Not really. What I want is a society and a government and its policies to reflect the values I find in Scripture—religious freedom, caring for the poor, caring about justice for all, caring about the least of these. But that’s not what you hear from Tea Party leadership.

LAWTON: Rev. Richard Cizik says he believes religious conservatives are in danger of being exploited by Tea Party leaders who have no intention of ever supporting their social causes.

CIZIK: They’ll take those evangelical votes, and then they will walk away from those people as quickly as a bat of an eye.

LAWTON: George Mason University professor Mark Rozell says similar things have happened before.

ROZELL: Very often in the past religious conservatives have felt burned that they have supported these Republican candidates who focused on the fiscal agenda hoping that those same candidates once elected would support the social issues agenda, and then when those individuals did not the religious conservatives became very discontented, and this has happened time and time again.

post06-teapartyLAWTON: There appear to be disagreements within the Tea Party over exactly how to approach social issues and religion. Former congressman Dick Armey, who is chairman of FreedomWorks, has repeatedly said that conservatives are not successful when they focus on what he calls “the wedge issues.” And while several national Tea Party leaders want to avoid God-talk, many in the rank and file don’t shy away from it.

BILLIE TUCKER (Tea Party Activist): And some people say don’t you put God into the Tea Party, Billie, because the minute you do you are going to run a bunch of people off. And I’m saying I’m putting God back into the United States of America again.

LAWTON: Some, like Indiana Republican congressman Mike Pence, tailor their message to their particular audience. At the Values Voter Summit, his speech was laced with references to religion and social issues, but at the Tea Party rally the same week he avoided even a direct reference to the Bible.

REP. MIKE PENCE (R-Indiana, speaking at Tea Party rally): Engraved on the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia are words from an ancient text. Those words read, “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land and unto all the inhabitants thereof.”

post07-teapartyLAWTON: Another complicating factor is conservative talk show host and Tea Party icon Glenn Beck, who is rallying for a national revival of faith, honor, and values. He, too, has support from conservative evangelicals who like his open discussion of religion and morality. But Beck is a Mormon, which has also generated controversy among evangelicals.

MOORE: You have a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which evangelical Christianity does not recognize as Christianity at all, who is being presented not just as a political leader but a religious leader, and not just as a religious leader but as the leader of a call to revival, and you have evangelical Christians cheering this and supporting this. That tells me that there is at least a significant segment of evangelical Christianity that has become defined politically rather than theologically and spiritually.

LAWTON: Despite the internal debates, Rozell says in these midterm elections the political bottom line is clear.

ROZELL: Most of these people, even if they disagree with each other as to whether the focus should be social or economic policy, they’re conservatives, and they’re going to vote against the Democratic Party, and that’s ultimately what’s going to count.

LAWTON: The bigger question, he says, is what happens if Tea Party-backed candidates do indeed win.

ROZELL: We learned from the 1994 so-called Republican revolution that it’s easier to be against something than it is to govern.

LAWTON: And agreeing on a post-election political agenda could be the biggest challenge of all.

I’m Kim Lawton in Washington.

  • Channah

    What words can I use to discribe the Tea party? Scary. Fanatical. Are they really listening to themselves?

  • KC

    “The bigger question, he says, is what happens if Tea Party-backed candidates do indeed win.” If that happens, then we see whether they have an actual plan and not just slogans. I’ve heard from them a lot of screaming for tax cuts but no specifics about what spending they’d cut to enable it.

    Too many of them are military, they won’t stand for reducing the military budget (which is the single largest chunk of the Federal budget) — in fact, they’d like the military budget increased. Too many of them are retired, and would not tolerate cuts to Social Security/Medicare/government pensions. Absolutely they would not allow military retirees to be told they can’t collect their pensions till 65 like the rest of us (someone who entered the military at 18 can retire with a full pension at age 38, and some do). Absolutely they will not back a plan that requires military and their families to pay market rate for health insurance (currently, their premiums cover only 9% of the payouts).

    A friend who’s a TeaPartier is absolutely against Disability benefits. Well, except for her brother, whom she cannot afford to support herself. And for a friend, whose 6 kids refuse to take her in. And another friend who has no spouse/siblings/children to support her. But cut all those strangers off without a cent. And this is the problem — they don’t realize that everyone who’s on Disability is someone’s friend/neighbor/relative, so there would be someone against cutting off benefits to every recipient.

  • Rev. Larry Hansen

    Re your piece on the “Tea Party” this afternoon (10/10): I was hoping you might have talked with Thomas Franks on his book “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” which deals with the issues discussed. The Rev. Cizik’s comments on the use (and abuse) of this subgroup in American society dovetail well with Franks’ work.

    (Rev.) Larry Hansen
    Portland, Oregon

  • Hugh (Bart) Vincelette

    There’s a political joke that actually describes the truths that conservatives ignore or are uniformed about. The latter would be hard to believe. Humor: `Republicans drove the nation into the ditch and now they`re complaining about the cost of the tow truck.’ I mean no offense to anyone, but the Tea Partiers appear to have no understanding of economics whatsoever. President Bush came into office with a great surplus, & ran up an incredible deficit.. His administration kept the enormous war costs off the books, so the deficit wouldn’t look as bad as it really was. President Obama put it back on the books as general revenue expenditures, for the sake of transparency, & the right wing thinks he’s responsible for the astonishing costs. Again, the Republicans funneled money to war lords & tribal leaders in exchange for information on the enemy terrorists( along with ample supplies of Viagra.) Nothing wrong with that, if it works. But most of these expenditures cannot be accounted for, & they amount to billions of dollars. Yes, billions.
    The polls that reveal the percentage of conservatives who still disbelieve the president’s citizenship & religious beliefs, are simply shocking. The downing of America over the past decade has been astronomical.Earlier this year, a brief test on US history was given to Oklahoma high school students. Only 27% were able to name the first elected president of the USA. My Gawd.! There are people living in grass huts in wilderness areas on other continents who could come up with George Washington.
    Gay rights are an issue that should never have been an issue. The fact is : in 2010 CE, liberty & justice aren’t yet for all. But as a man of science I predict that the foreseeable future will not bear well for those who denigrate an entire segment of humanity. I’ll give you a hint…..it has to do with interpersonal brain trauma & cytokines.

  • Tessie Belue

    The last time that we had a tea party was the protes again the taxation of tea by King George. During that era, slavery was lawful and so was killing Native-Americans. If the Tea Party wants to return to the Constitution of 1789, there would be no suffrage for women, African-Americans or Native-Americans. The 13th, 14th, and 19th amendsments did not exist. White, male/females conservatures oppose Obama’s liberal agenda. Why wouldn’t they? How many of them are unemployed, uninsured and unschooled?


    Reality is not an issue.
    When you live in a fantasy world you can say and do anything.
    Religion has no ethical base.

  • mar

    unethical ppl hiding behind a bible. jim demint spking about “values”? yeah that’s rich. someone “dabbling in the occult” (o’donnell, de), someone having an exorcism (palin, ak) these are all ppl from the republican party. i think the republicans state they are “common sense and values” but they do not practice Christianity. i think to some extent everyday ppl are being lied to by the republicans, and used in fear propaganda. they state they are holy, but practicing witchcraft, and being “freed” from witchcraft – is not your average american, and it is an issue. and it is not Chrisitanity. your average democrat does go to church, hold values, but understand freedom from and for religion. and further more, when is the last time any republican voted for a moral or social issue? not ever that i can remember. they stand for insurance companies, prescription companies, all companies. they like to say wwjd – i don’t think he would vote for insurance companies. but that is my take.

  • Nate

    You folks focus on the fringe just like uber conservatives focus on the far left. You are all morons. Our rights were given by the creator, whatever creator you believe in. Read some Locke or Thomas Paine. Progressives are ruining this country today. Labor unions are the problem. Read a book for crying our loud. Study history. Your policies and views do not work. This has been proven time and time again.

  • James Mitchell

    Friends or foes, I can’t decide. When religion and government have clasped hands, religious liberty has always flown out the window. Of course, as a fundamentalist Christian, I also have to acknowledge that every time ancient Israel had revivals, God always blessed them. But here, the question is which brands of Christianity??? The popular brand at the time???