READ TRANSCRIPT

BOB ABERNETHY, host: We examine the two canonizations now with Kim Lawton, managing editor of this program, and Kevin Eckstrom, editor-in-chief of Religion News Service. Kevin, welcome. This double canonization – unprecedented – and is there a message?

KEVIN ECKSTROM, (Religion News Service): Well, there is a message, you know, John Paul was on the fast track to sainthood, and the Vatican officials basically came to Pope Francis and said, “Okay, we're ready to make him a saint.” And the pope said, “Well what about John XXIII? You know, can we make him a saint too?” And they said, “Well, we don't have the second miracle yet.” And the pope said, “Ah, that's okay, we don't need that.” So what he was trying to do was offer something to both sides of the church: the conservatives who really hold up John Paul as an icon, and the progressives who really see a hero in John XXIII.

ABERNETHY: Kim, talk a little about the legacy of these people.

Canon-Convo-post01KIM LAWTON, managing editor: Well, both of them were, you know, giants in the church, and part of the reason for the fast track was because there was such an outpouring of calls for John Paul II to be made a saint when he died in 2005 – at his funeral, people were calling for that. And so that shows the amount of respect I think they had for his fighting against communism. For many, especially conservatives, really appreciated his standing for what they saw as the orthodoxy of the church. He really stressed things like abortion, but also at the end of his life, people liked the way he modeled how to be older and how to be sick. So there was that. He had a great outreach to the Jewish community, to young people, and just was this towering figure.

ECKSTROM: And John XXIII, I think really took the Catholic Church and turned it upside-down. And we're still trying figure out what all happened from Vatican II in the 1960s. But he touched the lived experience of Catholics around the world in a way that few other popes have done, so the way that Catholics experience mass, the way that they see themselves as a church, the way they see themselves in relation to the hierarchy. And even, as Kim mentioned, you know, their relationships with Jews. Up until Vatican II, Jews were blamed for the death of Jesus, and John XXIII and Vatican II said, “No, absolutely not.” So he really, you know, he said when he convened the council, he wanted to open the windows and let some fresh air blow in through the church, and we're still feeling the wind.

LAWTON: He was also known for his humor. The story we've been hearing a lot is he was asked one time how many people work at the Vatican. He said, “Eh, about half of them.”

ABERNETHY: I love that. But with John Paul II there's been some criticism, too, that in the eyes of many people he did not pay enough attention to the pain of so many people because of the sex abuse crisis in the church.

LAWTON: There's been a lot of criticism about that, especially from victims’ rights groups saying that that really marred his sainthood and his reputation. But other people say saints weren't supposed to be perfect, they were just supposed to lead lives of heroic virtue.

ABERNETHY: And finally, another thing that's been up there is – should any pope be canonized?

ECKSTROM: Well, it's a good question. In the first thousand years of the church, about 80, 85 popes were made saints. In the next 900 years, just three. So now, seven of the last ten dead popes are in process of being made saints in some degree or another. And so there's this renewed push now to make popes into saints, and that's not always how it was done in the church.

LAWTON: Some people say saints are supposed to be models for real people, and so who can a pope model for except for another pope? And so it's been an interesting conversation.

ABERNETHY: Many thanks. Kim Lawton of Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly, Kevin Eckstrom of Religion News Service.

Papal Canonizations Conversation

This is a big weekend at the Vatican as Pope Francis elevates two of his predecessors to sainthood: John XXIII and John Paul II. Host Bob Abernethy, managing editor Kim Lawton, and Kevin Eckstrom, editor-in-chief of Religion News Service, discuss the legacies of these two new saints and what their canonizations mean to Catholics and non-Catholics alike.

  • Matt McLaughlin
  • Suelie

    I do not understand having all these saints. It will soon (if not already) be to the point of Catholics not know which saint to pray to, or through. And, I also do know understand how people can be considered as having made miracles. I would say that there is a logical explanation for every one of these miracles-even if we do not know what it is.

  • akgannon

    This is for Kim Lawton: you say ” Some people say saints are supposed to be models for real people, and so who can a pope model for except for another pope?” A Pope was a child, young adult, and a man – a Pope at the end of his life. All that went before his becoming a Pope can be a model for others. I think, just as John Paul II showed us how to die, the Popes lead their lives, called by God, showing us how to live and therefore, become wonderful role models for anyone. Pope Francis stated in his canonization address: “We look to saints as models of Christian faith whom we should emulate.
    We cannot emulate the lives of Saints John XXIII and John Paul II as
    popes, but we can emulate them as Christians and disciples of Jesus, who
    through perseverance and prayer overcame many obstacles on their
    journeys to God.” http://bishopkevinfarrell.org/2014/05/the-unusual-word-pope-francis-used-to-describe-our-newest-saints/
    Thank you for listening.

  • Melanie

    It appears that the issue with the candidates for sainthood is that they are both so different and model opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of Catholic practice and tradition. John Paul the 23rd represents the more modern, progressive population of Catholic. He brought change to the way Catholics view mass and their relationships with Jews, a relationship that was previously scorned and not addressed. The fact that Pope John Paul the 23rd opened this door in the Catholic religion shows his willingness to break barriers in the Catholic faith and to make a true change.

    Pope John Paul the 2nd, on the other hand, represented the more traditional and conservative Catholics. He was scorned for his lack of attention towards the child sex abuse scandal that reached the Vatican during his time as pope, but he was still very respected. Personally, I feel that the concept of “sainthood” is slightly outdated in the way that people do not “model” their lives after saints the way they used to believe that had to. Saints are prayed to and their lives are reflected upon in mass at times, but their relevance to the Catholic lifestyle is somewhat diminished nowadays.

  • steve

    CREATION— FAITH & LOGIC BY STEVE FINNELL

    Is accepting as fact that God created the heavens and the earth strictly a faith alone concept? Is it not logical that an intelligent designer had to be involved in the creation process?

    FAITH: Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

    I accept the Genesis account to be true because of faith. Why? Because I trust the Bible to be the infallible word of God.

    LOGIC: Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen , being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.

    I accept the words in Romans 1:20 not only by faith, but by logic as well. I can see clearly God’s hand in creation.

    HOUSE HUNTING : FAITH & LOGICAL

    If you were shopping for a house and you walked into a housing development you had never been to before, and saw a house you wanted to purchase, would you not have to to accept the existence of that house by faith and logic?

    FAITH: Since you did not see anyone build the house, you would have to accept by faith it was built by an intelligent designer. How many years do you think it would take for wood, brick and mortar to evolve into a house?

    Logic: Since the house is in your sight, is it not logical that someone built the house?

    Everyone agrees that billions of years would not be long enough for brick, wood, and mortar to evolve into a house.

    To believe the theory of evolution you not only have to contradict logic, but you have to forsake reason.

    Those who deny that God exists and is the creator of all things, are truly without excuse!

    THE DEFINITION OF FAITH IN THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION: Faith in evolution is to believe that, nothing accidentally created the heavens and the earth over billions of years.

    (All Scripture quotes from:NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE)

    YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http//:steve-finnell.blogspot.com