Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Cover
Feature

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

WEB EXCLUSIVE:
Oscar Night
February 23, 2007    Episode no. 1026
Read This Week's September 5, 2008
Go
Hollywood, Religion, and the Real World
by Chris Herlinger

For some religious movie goers it was the year of JESUS CAMP, THE NATIVITY STORY, and END OF THE SPEAR.

But for a number of observers of film and the spiritual zeitgeist, the year-long season that culminates in the Oscars on February 25 was less about the overt religiosity and religious themes in these films than a continued swing to pessimism and a rather gray-hued type of moral reflection.

"I can't think of a hopeful one in the bunch," Roy Anker, a professor of English at Calvin College in Michigan, said of the current crop of films in contention for the Oscars or which created an "Oscar buzz."

Robert Johnston, a professor of theology and culture at Fuller Theological Seminary, concurred. He said at least two broad themes animated a number of films this past year: the reality of evil and responding to "the other" in our midst. These spiritual and ethical themes were more powerfully expressed, he believes, in overtly nonreligious films, such as BABEL and CHILDREN OF MEN.

To be sure, there were films that focused sharply on religious themes: the reality of tradition-bound religious beliefs in Hindu India (WATER), ongoing debates about religion and sexuality (the documentary THE BIBLE TELLS ME SO and the dramatization of a young man's experience in an "ex-gay" ministry, SAVE ME, both shown at the Sundance Film Festival), and the pernicious effects of the sexual abuse scandal of the Roman Catholic Church (the documentary DELIVER US FROM EVIL). Photo of Iwo Jima The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Office for Film and Broadcasting, in issuing its annual list of top 10 movies, described 2006 as a year that offered "a surfeit of superior films … with solid moral underpinnings." BABEL, UNITED 93, FLAGS OF OUR FATHERS and LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA all made the list.

Not everything was serious, of course. Johnston recalled a small but telling moment in the stock car racing comedy TALLADEGA NIGHTS -- Ricky Bobby's prayer to Baby Jesus. There was no better example of the fact that in 2006, spiritual and religious asides did not have to be explained or overly pondered, he said.

"Religion and spirituality," Johnston said, "have entered our post-secular world [so deeply] that they're not now seen as either discordant or as offensive." If anything, they are a balm -- welcome, relished and celebrated.

To Lynn Schofield Clark, who teaches at the University of Denver and is director of the Estlow International Center for Journalism and New Media, 2006 was a year in which the spirituality of transcendence proved less prominent in film than a "God of the here and now."

Photo of Iwo Jima "It was not a year for a 'touched by an angel' God," Clark said, noting that the spiritual dimension portrayed in films was about real, concrete human struggles on Earth, whether they were the problems of living in a globalized world (BABEL) or the growing awareness "that we're in deep trouble and we need better solutions than what we've come up with." A perfect example of that was AN INCONVIENENT TRUTH, the documentary focusing on Al Gore's environmental activism which has proven to be something of a quiet hit on the church-religious-education circuit.

For religious conservatives, the pessimism of 2006 contained little that was redeemable. Phil Boatwright, who writes on film for Baptist Press, the Southern Baptist Convention's news service, noted that four of the films nominated for best picture (THE DEPARTED, BABEL, LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE and LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA) are R-rated and in his view "featured either cynicism, political correctness, crudity, a countless amount of obscenity, or material that borders on pornographic."

"The artistic and technical merits achieved by directors Scorsese, Eastwood and the rest cannot be denied, but the perspective of these four R-rated films can thwart most any filmgoer's spiritual development," he wrote recently.

The evangelical magazine CHRISTIANITY TODAY had a slightly different take on 2006, nominating 10 films as "most redeemable of the year." Topping the list: THE NATIVITY STORY, which its panel of film viewers praised in particular for taking a fresh view of Joseph "in ways like never before," providing a much-needed look at "a righteous man." Other movies that made the CHRISTIANITY TODAY list included CHILDREN OF MEN, CHARLOTTE'S WEB, THE SECOND CHANCE, and THE NEW WORLD.

What of documentaries? Sharon Pucker Rivo, executive director of the National Center for Jewish Film at Brandeis University, said she was heartened that despite the increasing difficulty of finding funding -- "it's not a thriving business," she said -- fine documentaries continue to be made. One making the rounds at a number of Jewish film festivals and expected to go into wider release later this year is YIPPEE, filmmaker Paul Mazursky's first-person account of his journey to a small Ukrainian town with a group of Hasidic Jews.

Photo of IRAQ IN FRAGMENTS Rivo also praised the sizable crop of Iraq documentaries, such as MY COUNTRY, MY COUNTRY and IRAQ IN FRAGMENTS, which provided often startling "on the ground" glimpses of the combustible fusion of war, politics, and religion.

The Iraq war, she said, "should be the number-one topic for American filmmakers right now." But it isn't, she suggested, because it is not perceived "as great entertainment. It's not diversion. It's the real world."

The "real world," of course, is a painful, difficult place, and what Clark called "real bleakness" and a "feeling of hopelessness" in a number of films Anker described as "a continuation, a rather marked tendency to get serious and grim about the human circumstance," noting that CHILDREN OF MEN, BABEL and LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA continued a long arc of somber films, including 2006 Oscar nominees CRASH, CAPOTE, and SYRIANA.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
Clark sees continuity as well in the way postmodern themes of multiple narratives - devices common in BABEL, CRASH, and SYRIANA -- are now becoming something of the norm in films, a reflection, she believes, of globalized awareness of multiple voices, visions, and experiences.

For most audiences, however, theme and plot still trump forms of narrative, and a pronounced "cloud of fear" was in the air this past year, said the Rev. Mark Ruyak, who coordinates film and spirituality programs at Grace (Episcopal) Cathedral in San Francisco.

"It wasn't an easy year," he said, noting that fear was never far away in many films. Moreover, "there was nowhere for people to go with [the violence and flashes of nihilism]." That was a characteristic that Ruyak, an acknowledged admirer of films where hope rises amid struggle and pain, found sad and often frustrating.

Photo of CHILDREN OF MEN If any two films summed up the feeling of pessimism and dread it was CHILDREN OF MEN and BABEL, the former with its apocalyptic vision of societal disintegration and the latter with its notable absence of what Anker called "communication, sufficient bonding or care."

But among this group of observers there were pronounced and striking surprises when asked what films constituted interesting reflections of contemporary spiritual and cultural realities.

Clark, for example, picked BORAT. True, she said, Sacha Baron Cohen's often squeamishly uncomfortable examination of life in contemporary America was decidedly not a spiritual movie. But this genre-breaking film was, she argued, a "reflection of the spiritual zeitgeist" in the United States -- a country examining itself, looking outward to the rest of the world and curious about how the rest of the world looks at it.

Another of Clark's selections is the Oscar-nominated portrayal of a woefully dysfunctional family, LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE, an example of what she calls "existential angst" that has within it a "hopefulness that actually rises out of the dysfunction." It seems to suggest, Clark said, that hope comes "in very small packages, in not very expected places."

Ruyak also found hope and moments of grace in LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE (love overrode the family'sPhoto of THE PAINTED VEIL seemingly endless well of problems, he said) as well as the late Robert Altman's A PRAIRIE HOME COMPANION and the latest adaptation of Somerset Maugham's THE PAINTED VEIL.

The former was, in Ruyak's description, a poignant and often moving depiction of the ways people collectively say good-bye to each other. The sense of community Altman portrayed in a radio company's final performance was almost akin to a church congregation, he said. Meanwhile, THE PAINTED VEIL depicted a rocky marriage transformed "by love, forgiveness, and understanding," Ruyak said, amid the calamities of a cholera epidemic and the panorama of pre-revolutionary China.

Johnston was also a fan of THE PAINTED VEIL, finding in it a moving portrayal of the truths of discipline and grace, a kind of grid that frames the relationship of the estranged couple played by Edward Norton and Naomi Watts.

Still, these occasional glimpses of hope were overshadowed by abundant pessimism. For Ruyak, the pessimism -- aside from such graphically violent films as THE DEPARTED and PAN'S LABRYINTH -- was perhaps most pronounced in CHILDREN OF MEN, whose despairing futuristic message about human society he believes is "perhaps one step away from where we could be heading." (The title of the movie and the novel by P.D. James on which it is based comes from Psalm 90 -- "Thou turnest man to destruction and sayest return, ye children of men.") Yet even here, Ruyak said, there were depictions of "people coming together in a very bleak environment, still creating relationships, struggling with life."

Photo of THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND For Johnston, a sense of evil was hard to avoid, and in films as vastly different as THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA, about a ruthless Manhattan magazine editor, and THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND, based on the events of Idi Amin's brutal dictatorship in Uganda.

In both films, two remarkably self-absorbed characters embody in their respective -- and hugely different -- spheres of influence "a destructive, evil reality," Johnston said.

"One's a comedy, but at the same time, we know it [the reality it portrays] can be true," he said. "The other is a 'mocku-drama' in which we are reminded of the complicated nature of leadership, in which Idi Amin was both inviting and horrendous, both winsome and horrific."

"It's not to put them [the two films] on the same playing field," Johnston added. "One is eye candy and the other is rooted in history and is forever sobering. But in both evil is manifest; evil as destructive action that has implications and real consequences."

Chris Herlinger, a New York-based freelance journalist, has written for Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly on religion and science and religion at the movies.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP