Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

PERSPECTIVES:
Religion-Related Violence
September 17, 1997    Episode no. 103
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
BOB ABERNETHY: Religion-related violence is a fact of life and death, as old as humankind, and it's the subject of this week's Perspectives segment. We begin with many voices raising questions about violence in the name of God.

Unidentified Man #1: I think that anybody that would want to harm another person based upon their belief in God and based upon somebody else's nonbelief in their God, they really have to look at themselves.

Unidentified Woman #1: Religion divides more people than it unites. How can you wipe out a whole race if it be in Ireland, or Bosnia, or the former Soviet Union, simply based on religion?

Photo of soldire Unidentified Man #2: If you take something on faith, that means you don't have to think about it. You can believe it without thinking, and if you believe without thinking, then you may do what you're told to do, which may be morally wrong. If your religious leaders tell you that you should kill because that's what our religion tells you, you may do so without thinking.

Unidentified Man #3: In the Bible it says, "An eye for an eye," so if someone attacks me, I'm going to respond accordingly.

Unidentified Woman #2: I think if someone dies for God and that's what they truly believe, I think that they would definitely be forgiven.

Unidentified Man #4: Being a Catholic, it's a point of hypocrisy in the Church -- men that are killing other men in the name of God.

ABERNETHY: We want to raise those questions now with Jerry Powers of the U.S. Catholic Conference, Fahhim Abdulhadi of the American Muslim Council, and Rabbi James Rudin of the American Jewish Committee.

Mr. Powers, how do you answer the charge that religion causes violence?

Photo of JERRY POWERS JERRY POWERS (U.S. Catholic Conference): There's no doubt that religion is a factor in these conflicts. It takes 13 walls to divide Protestants from Catholics in Belfast, but I don't think you can really understand the conflicts if you focus principally on religion, because I think political and economic factors are much more central to these conflicts.

ABERNETHY: Mr. Abdulhadi, many of us in the West are confused or perhaps just don't know enough about the Islamic concept of jihad. Does the Qur'an teach -- does Islam teach -- that it should be such a thing as a holy war against non-Islam -- non-Muslims?

FAHHIM ABDULHADI (American Muslim Council): The word "jihad" translates to mean "struggling to one's utmost." When it's applied to warfare, yes, fighting is allowed in self-defense and also against oppressors; however, there are restraints put on that, and that being that you can only aggress against combatants and those who contribute to the struggle, as opposed to women and children.

ABERNETHY: So when a young Muslim turns himself into a bomb and goes into a crowded part of Israel, that person is doing something that is not condoned by Islam?

Photo of FAHHIM ABDULHADI Mr. ABDULHADI: This person has attacked noncombatants -- who are people, for instance, in the Ben Yehuda Street mall who were there to shop -- and therefore, what he has done is outside my understanding of the boundaries of Islam.

ABERNETHY: Rabbi Rudin, the Torah, the Old Testament for Christians, presents a God who is himself violent, destructive, wrathful. Does that establish a kind of a tradition in Judaism -- perhaps Christianity, too -- of violence?

Rabbi JAMES RUDIN (American Jewish Committee): Bob, the Jewish religion is not just the Hebrew Bible. There's 2,000 years of rabbinic tradition filled with mitigating laws, compassion, justice, changing situations, so that it's a mistake, a great mistake to read the Hebrew Bible as if that's all there is to the Jewish religion. It's a religion that does hold its religious leaders accountable, and the job of religious leaders, all of them -- that's why I'm very pleased to hear Fahhim condemning the attacks on noncombatants and innocent civilians. The job is to root out the absolutists who seem to know all the truth. What counts is authenticity, accountability, and, unless a religious leader is prepared to do that, then they're not being really a leader. They're being just a follower.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
ABERNETHY: So is it fair to say that in each of the traditions, violence except in self-defense is condemned?

Mr. POWERS: Yes.

Rabbi RUDIN: Absolutely.

Mr. ABDULHARI: Self-defense -- when you understand that self-defense does not mean you wait for the other person to hit you first. I mean, if you see someone is oppressing the believers and try to stop them from practicing their religion, then you're allowed to attack them rather than wait for them to attack you.

Mr. POWERS: I think it's important to point out that in Northern Ireland, for example, the religious leaders have been very clear -- more clear than almost anyone -- in condemning the violence on both sides, by the loyalist paramilitaries, by the IRA, and the people of the paramilitaries themselves do not claim religious warrant for what they're doing.

Photo of JAMES RUDIN Rabbi RUDIN: There's also one other point. I think it's a great mistake to relativize all religions. As you have to be very, very accurate, each religion has its own traditions, its own history. As a Jew who -- speaking as a person in a faith that's been persecuted by both Muslims and Christians -- the word "violence" means not just physical violence but abusive religion, verbal violence, and so we have to sort out every religious tradition and talk about it in accurate terms and not relativize it.

Mr. ABDULHARI: I would also say that it's unfair to limit and to criticize the religions for violence when just about every philosophy has a certain amount of violence within it. Thomas Jefferson said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of tyrants and patriots." Therefore, he's saying even in democracy, violence has its place.

ABERNETHY: What are the responsibilities of religious leaders, then? Is it the responsibility of a mullah in the Middle East to condemn the suicide bomber? Is it the responsibility of Jewish leaders to condemn an Orthodox Torah student who assassinates the prime minister because he thinks he's doing the will of God?

Rabbi RUDIN: As Jewish religious leaders have done, calling it a desecration.

Mr. ABDULHARI: It's the responsibility of them to condemn it, but it's also their responsibility to make sure that both sides are understood and therefore when people are acting outside the boundaries of Islam with the suicide bombings, we have to understand the pressures that are on them driving them to those extremes.

Rabbi RUDIN: Well, that's not sufficient. You have to -- Fahhim, religious leaders have to hold --

Mr. ABDULHARI: Peoples' homes isn't sufficient?

Photo of discussion Rabbi RUDIN: Hold -- have to -- you know, religious leaders.

Mr. ABDULHARI: Stealing their land isn't sufficient?

Rabbi RUDIN: May I speak?

Mr. ABDULHARI: Sure.

Rabbi RUDIN: Religious leaders have to be universal inside their own religious community. Easy to preach to their own group; it's harder to preach to the people who are the absolutists inside a tradition. Yitzhak Rabin -- of blessed memory -- said about some of the extremists in Judaism, he said, "Sane Judaism spits them out." I'm waiting to hear from some of the Muslim leaders in the Middle East about Islamic activists who blow up innocent people.

Mr. POWERS: I think he's saying ...

ABERNETHY: Gentlemen ...

Mr. ABDULHARI: I think "sane Islam" spits them out as well. I have no problem with that.

ABERNETHY: Good. Thanks to all of you.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP