Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Cover
Feature

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

EXCERPT:
PEOPLE OF PARADOX: A HISTORY OF MORMON CULTURE
April 20, 2007    Episode no. 1034
Read This Week's September 5, 2008
Go
Read an advance excerpt adapted from PEOPLE OF PARADOX: A HISTORY OF MORMON CULTURE by Terryl L. Givens (Oxford University Press, 2007):

"When the Puritans arrived in America in the early seventeenth century," writes one historian of philosophy, "they brought not only their strong theological orientation but also tenacious communal impulses, utopian hopes, a sense of being chosen, and a belief in social and religious exclusivity and uniformity." This description sounds uncannily prophetic of the Mormon experiment of two hundred years later. The Latter-day Saints also gathered to a physical place of refuge (several times in succession), initiated a communal society, captured utopian moments and millennialist glimpses in Kirtland [Ohio] and Nauvoo [Illinois], heard themselves declared a chosen people, and differentiated themselves with unique beliefs, practices, and covenants. But the Mormons reenacted these Puritan aspirations to spiritual exclusivity with a monumental difference: they did it in the context of a hostile culture consisting of fellow citizens rather than in the relative isolation of a wilderness refuge. The Babylon the Puritans left behind was so geographically remote as to be little more than a rhetorical trope. Their principal adversary in spiritual warfare was a devil whose menace preachers had to assert through harrowing sermons (or who could occasionally reveal his hand through troublesome witches or marauding Indians). Mormon religious difference, on the other hand, was emphatically demonstrated by perennial conflict with neighbors and militia that frequently amounted to bloodshed, and fellow Christians that threatened a very literal extermination. Even once removed to the remote Utah desert, Mormons found themselves besieged by a federal army, federal judges, and punitive federal laws.

Photo of Joesph Smith The Mormon emphasis on exceptionalism is traceable to the first recorded spiritual experience of the young Joseph Smith. Long before he ever heard the word Mormon, or had an inkling of what his life or ministry would stand for, he learned what he was to be set against. Having knelt in a wooded grove on his family's farm and inquired of God what church he should join to find salvation, he found he was not to be a fellow traveler with any Christian then alive: "I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt." Like many religious revolutionaries, Joseph early saw his relationship to the world in thoroughly adversarial terms. "I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me, almost in my infancy?" From the time he was "an obscure boy, only between fourteen and fifteen years of age," he would later record, "all the sects...united to persecute me." Less than two years before his death, he would boast that "deep water is what I am wont to swim in. It all has become a second nature to me; and I feel, like Paul, to glory in tribulation." Jonathan Edwards similarly gloried, "I am born to be a man of strife," and Luther's self-conception was famously an embattled one.

What was different about Joseph's posture was how effectively he imbued an entire people with this same sense of hostile separation from the world. It didn't hurt that he had the weight of scripture to reinforce Latter-day Saint exceptionalism. A revelation received a year after the church's founding declared that Mormonism was "the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth, with which I, the Lord, am well pleased" -- a designation "too low to scorn" in the view of one Baptist preacher writing in 1843. Reformation churches of the era contended vociferously over doctrine and converts, but made virtually no comparable sweeping institutional claims. Such rhetoric was until then largely associated with a church that contemporaries would liken to Mormonism: Roman Catholicism.

But Mormonism went far beyond mere allusions to their church as "the only true" one. Early on, Joseph Smith introduced a geographical gathering based on reference to chosen lineage. Mormons were not unique in this regard; Christians had long seen themselves as spiritual Israel, and religious figures would occasionally insist on going beyond metaphor.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
But as Armand Mauss traces in great detail, "Smith's teachings went beyond those which were generally accepted, among them the importance of literal Israelite lineage, especially from Ephraim." Reading themselves into the biblical promises to a chosen lineage, and buttressed by Joseph's own pronouncements that the Holy Ghost was "more powerful in expanding the mind, enlightening the understanding, and storing the intellect with present knowledge [in] a man who is of the literal seed of Abraham," Mormonism's self-construction into a distinct and chosen group "began a process of expansion," writes Mauss, "that lasted well into the twentieth century." That expansion would come to merge with doctrines of pre-mortal existence to posit a chosen status and assignment to a particular lineage that preceded birth itself. These doctrinal emphases faded by the latter half of the twentieth century.

But cultural vocabulary born of earlier years continues to reinforce difference. Following Book of Mormon cues, Mormons have long employed the word "gentile" to refer to non-members, and even though the term is today used with gentle irony by Mormons among themselves, the world is still effectively polarized in Mormon discourse between members and "non-members." Ö

The Mormon sense of uniqueness and exile on the one hand is counterbalanced with a theology, rituals, and research programs that aspire to universal integration. This conflict between exclusivity on the one hand, and on the other a moral imperative (not to say primal longing) for universal community and acceptance in a larger fellowship is manifest at many levels of Mormon culture. Most ironic, perhaps, is the dilemma in which Mormons find themselves with regard to the community of Christian churches. After predicating their very existence on the corruption of all other Christian faiths ("I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong"), and asserting their unique title to be its "only true" embodiment, Latter-day Saints are chagrined when they are excluded from the very community of believers they have just excoriated. In May of 2000, the United Methodist Church passed a resolution insisting that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints "does not fit within the bounds of the historic, apostolic tradition of Christian faith," citing "radically differing doctrine on such matters of belief as the nature and being of God; the nature, origin, and purpose of Jesus Christ; and the nature and way of salvation." The Presbyterian Church U.S.A. and the Southern Baptist Convention passed similar resolutions. The Vatican declared Mormon baptisms invalid in 2001. Latter-day Saints react to such announcements with hurt and shock. Mormon apologists write books in which they respond with an emphatic "yes" to the rhetorical question, "Are Mormons Christian?" or make the case so strongly that they can ask with no small irony, "Are Christians Mormon?" This is in some ways curious, since Mormons tend to endorse the view of Jan Shipps, who has written that Mormons have the same relationship to Christianity that early Christians had to Judaism. And this without seeming to realize that at some point early Christians stopped being offended when they were no longer considered Jewish.

The physical congregating to Utah ceased as the official program of the LDS church a century ago, but leaders still inculcate in young and old alike the imperative to maintain discernible difference. President Spencer W. Kimball encouraged (female) members to be "seen as distinct and different -- in happy ways -- from the [people] of the world." Gordon B. Hinckley, current Prophet and President of the church, has shown a fondness for the words of Peter, believing they serve as both characterization of and challenge to the Latter-day Saints: "Ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people" (1 Peter 2:9). He can also use less apostolic language on the subject. "We're not a weird people," he said to interviewer Mike Wallace. Such peculiarity is reinforcing as a boundary marker but, as the latter comment reveals, it can be a hindrance to bridge building, to missionary work, and perhaps most poignantly, to Mormons who must engage the world as participants in a human community that increasingly transcends Utah boundaries.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP