Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

PERSPECTIVES:
Ethics of Land Mines
December 12, 1997    Episode no. 115
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
BOB ABERNETHY: Now, Perspectives, this week on the ethics of land mines. Are they necessary to save the lives of soldiers, or should they be banned because they take so many lives of civilians?

Ten Chanareft lost both legs to a land mine in Cambodia. On Wednesday, he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the International Campaign to Ban Land Mines and the campaign's coordinator, Jody Williams, who helped bring the issue to the world's attention.

JODY WILLIAMS: They recognized it was not enough to just lift the mines, not enough to just help the victims.

ABERNETHY: Williams's group was largely responsible for getting more than 120 nations to agree to stop using antipersonnel mines.

Ms. WILLIAMS: We achieved this ban because we were right. We achieved this ban because we never wavered. We achieved this ban because it was the morally and ethically correct position.

ABERNETHY: The United States, Russia, and China were among the countries that did not sign the agreement. Even though the U.S. over the past four years has spent more than all nations combined on demining efforts, the administration feels the weapons are necessary for defending certain areas, like the Demilitarized Zone in Korea.

Unidentified Woman: The United States can't really afford to sign a treaty like that. We've got men and women guarding the DMZ in Korea that depend on those land mines for their own safety and security, and in other places in the world as well.

Unidentified Man #1: I think we can find other ways of preventing occupation other than land mines.

Unidentified Man #2: I think President Clinton ought to be above board and stop this kind of two-faced approach, that we're doing more than any other country to try and get rid of them, but we're going to keep ours. I think that's a little disingenuous.

ABERNETHY: Here to analyze the military and moral aspects of land mines are John Carr, Secretary of the Department of Social Development of World Peace of the U.S. Catholic Conference, the National Organization of the U.S. Catholic Bishops, and Dr. Bill Taylor, Senior Vice President of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. To both of you, welcome. John Carr, let me begin with you. What's the argument against land mines?

JOHN CARR (United States Catholic Conference): Well, banning antipersonnel land mines for the Catholic bishops is an urgent moral priority because fundamentally it's a matter of life and death. There are a hundred million of these things strewn about the earth. Twenty-six thousand men, women, and children die or are maimed every year because of land mines. So, there are more land mines than there are children in Angola. So for us, this is an act of loquisial solidarity, it is missionaries and relief workers, and the pope, who has urged us to get involved in the effort to ban land mines because the U.S. has to exercise some leadership. It is not enough for us to say, "You get rid of your land mines, but we're going to keep them."

ABERNETHY: Dr. Taylor, what's your case for them?

Dr. BILL TAYLOR (Center for Strategic and International Studies): Well, let me give you a little background. I spent 27 years in the army. I fought in combat in Vietnam. I know the uses and problems with land mines. But number two, I agree that all dumb, indiscriminate land mines should be banned from the face of this earth, and the United States has had the lead in this. Other people sign papers, like a treaty.

The United States, the Clinton administration, who I do not agree with on many issues, is on the side of the angels on this one. We do more than sign paper and talk, we remove land mines. And the indiscriminate land mines are not ours, except in Korea, and I know Korea, from the north and south side. I'm happy to talk about it.

ABERNETHY: Let me ask you about the moral underpinnings of your arguments. John, what's -- we were talking about the indiscriminate thing. That's core -- that's key for the bishops, isn't it?

Mr. CARR: Well, yes. I mean, what's clear -- Bill makes the case that smart mines are okay and dumb mines are bad. Dumb mines are bad, but smart mines are a big part of the problem because you can't get the world to give up land mines when you say, "We're going to keep ours, you give up yours."

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
ABERNETHY: Do you want to make a distinction between what the dumb and the smart land mines are?

Dr. TAYLOR: We don't have any dumb land mines anymore except on the DMZ in Korea. We destroyed them all, gotten rid of them elsewhere. We have high-tech land ...

Mr. CARR: Not yet, actually. We're committed to do so.

Dr. TAYLOR: ... high-tech land mines. They're dial-a-mine and you set them for 48 hours, sometimes 15 hours. They self-destruct and they are not the problem.

ABERNETHY: Not there forever?

Dr. TAYLOR: Yeah.

ABERNETHY: Okay, but back to the moral underpinnings.

Mr. CARR: The world must get rid of these weapons. The world has said, "We are not going to fight our wars this way." The United States has to take the lead in that, and you can't be a leader when you say, "We're going to keep ours, high-tech mines, and you give up yours."

ABERNETHY: But the problem is that they kill children. They kill not -- anybody.

Mr. CARR: Well, they also kill our soldiers. There's a big debate whether land mines are going to protect our soldiers or threaten them. In Bosnia, they're part of the problem. Our military chaplains are just as convinced as our relief workers that we've got to get rid of the land mines.

Dr. TAYLOR: Those are the dumb, indiscriminate land mines put out by the Serbs and others, not our land mines. In fact, we're spending a lot of money training people and picking those land mines up.

Now, wait. On the moral side, all wars should forever be gone. They're not. Number two, all weapons should be destroyed. They won't be.

Mr. CARR: But some weapons are worse than others, and weapons that result in the death and maiming of 26,000 children --

Dr. TAYLOR: I agree with you.

Mr. CARR: -- a year have to be gone.

Dr. TAYLOR: Therefore, if anybody has land mines in the future, they should be the high-tech self-destruct that don't kill and maim innocent anybody.

Mr. CARR: Dr. Taylor, we have to learn to fight our wars without land mines of any kind.

Dr. TAYLOR: Please tell me how to fight a war, okay?

Mr. CARR: Anti -- well, no. The Pentagon -- there are many people, many military leaders who disagree with you.

Dr. TAYLOR: Every single serving four-star admiral and general signed on to a paper to Clinton, saying do not sign this thing, and the Clinton position is, as expressed by Cohen and many others, we are going to take those dumb land mines up and the Korean peninsula ...

Mr. CARR: They're also going to take the smart mines away.

Dr. TAYLOR: As soon as we have a substitute, electromagnetic pulse. We've set the date of 2006 or earlier.

Meanwhile, we're going to go around the world helping people remove these terrible mines that kill and maim innocent people.

Mr. CARR: We're making great progress. One hundred and twenty countries, many of them who export mines, who use mines, have said we're not going to do it anymore. We can make more progress if the United States, instead of resisting the progress, will lead.

Dr. TAYLOR: The North Koreans, who didn't sign up, and who are the threat to 80,000 Americans -- there are a lot of civilians in South Korea -- they haven't signed up.

Mr. CARR: A world without land mines ...

Dr. TAYLOR: And they're not going to.

Mr. CARR: A world without land mines is safer not only for children, but also for our troops.

Dr. TAYLOR: Dumb mines, you're right.

ABERNETHY: Gentlemen, thanks very much.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP