Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

PERSPECTIVES:
Religious Fundamentalism
March 6, 1998    Episode no. 127
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
BOB ABERNETHY: The power of the Taliban in Afghanistan is one sign of the growing influence of ultra-orthodox religious movements in the world. In elections in India this week, Hindu nationalists won, not a majority, but the largest block of votes. In Israel, the ultra-orthodox parties are vital to the government's coalition, and Islamic fundamentalist are in opposition to the governments, not only in Afghanistan but also in Turkey, Iran, Egypt, Sudan, and Algeria. Scott Appleby, a professor of history at the University of Notre Dame, is one of this country's leading experts on fundamentalism.

Dr. Appleby, what's the common denominator? What is fundamentalist?

Professor R. SCOTT APPLEBY (University of Notre Dame): A fundamentalist is someone who is very familiar with the modern world, with technology, with engineering, but who is angry at the way it's developed, leaving God out of the picture. Religious law, traditional values, has been the mistake, in their minds, and so they're fighting back in various ways to create new alternative ways of organizing society around traditional religious values.

ABERNETHY: Why is fundamentalism on the rise in so many countries?

Prof. APPLEBY: Well, because so many different kinds of beliefs and philosophies, like nationalism or communism or forms of capitalism, have failed. They haven't delivered the goods. People are still mired in poverty. There's inequality, gross injustice, human rights violations. So the reasoning is, if we return to what is ours, our Islamic values, our Jewish values, our Hindu traditions, the door to progress and justice will be open.

ABERNETHY: But it's also used, isn't it, by people who want to get or keep power, and primarily for that reason, and used as a way to buttress the political side.

Prof. APPLEBY: Sure. Many of the leaders of these movements are concerned primarily with political power. And so they stand between the true believers, the rank and file, who have different motivations and who in a sense are closer to the actual religious practices. The leaders look at the interest of those people, but they also have their eye on the larger political situation and their own aggrandizement.

ABERNETHY: And in some places, they take a very narrow interpretation of the religious tradition, don't they?

Prof. APPLEBY: Yes, they do. That's the case certainly in Afghanistan, where the Taliban are trying to impose a very strict, rigid, and narrow version of the Islamic law.

ABERNETHY: Why are people so concerned about the possibility that the Hindu nationalists in India will form a government?

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
Prof. APPLEBY: Fundamentalist-type movements like the Hindu nationalist movement are very exclusive, and the Hindu nationalists want to define Indian citizenship around Hinduness, being a Hindu. That's not good news for the 120 million Muslims of the country, much less the other religious minorities.

ABERNETHY: What are some of the specific things about western culture that are so offensive to the Islamic fundamentalist?

Prof. APPLEBY: Well, this notion of separating the religious from public concerns and not institutionalizing it by the law or through the Constitution has led to corruption, decadence, high rates of divorce, abortion -- a whole list of moral ills that various fundamentalists around the world will claim are due to America's secularism.

ABERNETHY: And to what extent do you think Islamic fundamentalism is a threat to us?

Prof. APPLEBY: Certainly it's not a threat to the United States in terms of Muslims living here. And most Muslims around the world, the vast majority, are good citizens and law-abiding people who have no interest in violence of any type. It becomes a challenge to U.S. foreign policy in a place like Egypt, where, should the Islamic fundamentalists come to power, relations with the West certainly could be in trouble, and there would be concern about human rights violations in Egypt itself.

ABERNETHY: Yes. Back to this cultural thing, you used a phrase in a conversation that we had some time ago, west -- what was it? "Westoxication"?

Prof. APPLEBY: Westoxication -- which is one Iranian fundamentalist described the problem of the West being. That is, it's seductive, it intoxicates us with materialism, with its television, with its consumer culture, but it's also toxic. So it's poison, it weans us away from what really counts, our families, our moral codes, and so we have to resist it.

ABERNETHY: So, quickly, the battle around the world between a secular modern state on one hand and a fundamentalist religious state on the other -- who's winning?

Prof. APPLEBY: Well, the fundamentalists are not going to win, and they're not winning now, because they can't stay fundamentalists if they come to power. They have to compromise. So they don't stand much of a chance in societies where there are strong civil institutions, labor unions, schools.

ABERNETHY: Yes.

Prof. APPLEBY: Diversity.

ABERNETHY: Yes. Yes. Many thanks.

Prof. APPLEBY: Thank you.

ABERNETHY: Scott Appleby, professor of history at Notre Dame.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP