Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories
Headlines
Election Coverage
Calendar
TV Schedule
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
For Teachers
Resources
Feedback

NEWS FEATURE:
Relief Efforts in Sudan
August 7, 1998    Episode no. 149
Read stories by week: 
Go
BOB ABERNETHY: In the wake of a temporary cease-fire in Sudan's civil war, international aid groups have begun emergency famine relief efforts. Aid officials say about 1.5 million people are at risk of starvation there, but as Kim Lawton reports, it's a situation mired in tough ethical questions.

KIM LAWTON: No one disputes the devastation of Sudan's latest famine. Hundreds are dying every day. These pictures were taken just last week by a delegation [from] World Relief, a U.S.-based Christian aid group. The delegation was led by the group's president, Clive Calver.

Picture of CLIVE CALVER CLIVE CALVER (President, World Relief): I don't think I've ever seen a situation as bad as Sudan. I felt like the Americans must have felt when they arrived at Auschwitz and Dachau concentration camps. I watched skeletons walking.

LAWTON: Numerous agencies launched massive relief efforts, trying to send in as much food and medical aid as possible before the current window of opportunity closes. But doing relief work in Sudan can be a complicated endeavor. Fifteen years of civil war between the National Islamic Front government in the north and the mainly Christian and animist rebels in the south have exacerbated the famine. Food often becomes the deadliest weapon in the ongoing conflict.

Journalist Michael Maren, a former aid worker in Africa, has been highly critical of much of the relief work in Sudan.

MICHAEL MAREN (Journalist): What relief efforts end up doing is eventually catering a war.

LAWTON: Sudan's temporary truce was declared to allow relief aid to come in, but that often means the government or the rebels dictate how, when, and where aid is delivered.

Mr. MAREN: Well, there's a food spigot. They can turn it on and turn it off so that people in all of these places end up depending on the government or depending on the rebels, you know, for food, and people know it. Famine in Africa is political, and unless we address it politically, what we're doing is feeding the famine by sending food, in fact, and feeding the war, which is causing the famine.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
LAWTON: But Calver says political arguments ring hollow when you're on the ground in Sudan holding a dying child in your arms.

Dr. CALVER: Frankly, I don't really care about the pontificating over economic conditions or political implications. I just want to give this little boy a chance to grow up and be a man and live a life.

Picture of MICHAEL MAREN Mr. MAREN: I'm not saying don't send in bags of food. We can't just sit back and let people starve to death. But by only doing that, we're shirking our responsibility. We are in fact making things worse.

LAWTON: Calver says groups like World Relief recognize that political solutions are needed in Sudan, but he says the first priority is simply keeping the people alive.

Dr. CALVER: Let's love them, care for them, heal them, help them, and feed them, and then let's challenge the prevailing socioeconomic and political conditions in that area and ask how we can make long-term changes effective. We need short-term relief and long-term development, not one or the other.

Picture of KIM LAWTON LAWTON: Everyone agrees the ultimate goal is stopping the suffering that has plagued that nation for so very long. The question is, how? I'm Kim Lawton, RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY, in Washington.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP