Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Cover
Profile

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

FEATURE:
War on Drugs
October 6, 2000    Episode no. 406
Read This Week's October 3, 2008
Go
BOB ABERNETHY: As with poverty, so with drugs. There's a continuing national debate over what to do. What's the right balance between treatment and punishment for drug addicts? In California, there's a proposition on next month's ballot that would replace prison with treatment for many drug offenders, and it's backed by many clergymen and women. Ruben Martinez has our story in Los Angeles.

Proposition 36 Info Stand RUBEN MARTINEZ: In November, Californians will vote on Proposition 36, a ballot initiative which would divert first- and second-time drug offenders into treatment programs instead of giving them jail time. Today nearly one-half of all women and almost one-third of all men in the California penal system are serving time for drug-related matters.

Three decades into America's war on drugs, some members of the religious community want to revisit the debate over addiction and how best to deal with it.

SCOTT RICHARDSON Reverend SCOTT RICHARDSON (All Saints Church): There are a lot of people who still believe that addiction has essentially to do with weakness or bad morals or some kind of poor sense of discipline in a person's life. That doesn't really explain fully -- it doesn't even get close to explaining what addiction is about.

Reverend HOWARD MOODY (Religious Leaders for a More Just & Compassionate Drug Policy): The federal laws are very harsh, and so we're trying to help people understand what that does to send people away for that length of time and to work at the whole question of humanizing -- of the humanizing of the drug addict.

MARTINEZ: The statistics are numbing. Ever-increasing numbers of young men and women, mostly black and Hispanic, are streaming to the jails and prisons on non-violent drug offenses. By and large, religious leaders have supported the war on drugs. Indeed, some of them have even provided its moral underpinnings. But a new coalition of clergy is calling into question this approach to addiction, pushing for treatment instead of incarceration and for compassion instead of punishment.

Baptist Minister Howard Moody is the founder of Religious Leaders for a More Just & Compassionate Drug Policy, a small but influential coalition of clergy and theologians.

HOWARD MOODY Rev. MOODY: I haven't felt and still do not think that we can change the drugs laws in this country without the people in the churches and synagogues and all being in favor of it and helping to change that. I really don't.

Mrs. MARY MORENO RICHARDSON(Episcopalian Chaplain, Los Angeles County Juvenile Hall): ...and God is with you.

MARTINEZ: Among clergy in favor of reforming drug policy is Mary Richardson, an Episcopalian chaplain at a Los Angeles County juvenile detention center. Richardson, herself a recovering alcoholic, counsels and offers support to teens, many of whom who have drug or alcoholic tendencies or come from families who do.

MARY MORENO RICHARDSON Mrs. RICHARDSON: Anybody here ever grow up in an alcoholic home? I did. I did. And sometimes that's not a real happy place to be. We may come into contact with people in our lives, whether it be relatives or friends or boyfriends or partners or whoever, who do have drug and alcohol problems. And how do we protect our families and our children from doing that?

I want them to see the potential that is within them, and within all of us, and awaken that spark inside of them so that they get in touch with their own spiritual sight and the power that they can get from knowing that they are made in the image of God, and so that they can continue and become instruments of peace in our community.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
MARTINEZ: But there are others working with this same population of addicts who think that a tougher brand of love is still needed.

MARTINEZ: Marcella Wess, a recovering cocaine addict, is the coordinator of the Redmonds drug court, a judicially supervised treatment program.

Ms. MARCELLA WESS (Drug Coordinator, Redmonds, California): I used to say I was the four D's; I was depressed, deceitful, destructive, and dangerous. I was what you might call a menace to society.

MARTINEZ: Wess believes that addicts would not be held accountable under Prop 36. She prefers California's current drug court system, an outpatient treatment plan that mandates drug tests for offenders and sanctions them with jail time if they fail.

MARCELLA WESS Ms. WESS: The worst thing that can happen to you in Prop 36 is treatment.

MARTINEZ: And that's just not enough.

Ms. WESS: That's not enough. Proposition 36 sounds good. When you say, 'Let's not put people in jail, let's not punish people for using drugs, let's not incarcerate them, let's treat them,' that sounds good on the surface. But when you break the whole initiative down, you see that they're not really caring about what happens to an addict or what happens to those first-time offenders.

MARTINEZ: Mary Richardson's husband, Scott, is an Episcopal priest at All Saints Church in Pasadena, well-known as a liberal activist, dating back to the Vietnam War. Proposition 36 is high on the church's list of political priorities.

Rev. RICHARDSON: I became aware of the fact that the way we're dealing with people that are essentially sick in our culture is neither compassionate nor just.

MARTINEZ: The pro-reform message even comes from the pulpit at All Saints these days.

Unidentified Reverend: And we need to take a stand about a failed drug policy in this United States; that one of the greatest sins is to take a health-care issue and a social problem and criminalize it.

MARTINEZ: But voices such as these, while increasingly heard these days, have long been in the minority in the tough-on-crime era. Indeed, there appears to be dissention, even among the All Saints Congregation, on the issue of drug policy. Like the public, theologians and scholars are divided on the issue. John Coe, a professor of philosophy and psychology, believes that drug abuse cuts to some deeply held Judeo-Christian beliefs about personal responsibility. He argues that society must send a clear message that certain behaviors will have consequences.

JOHN COE Professor JOHN COE (Biola University): If our laws reflect solely a reformative and not a deterrent, and I would say even a retributive, a retribution, then I think there's a message to the children that, 'Well, look, I -- I'm not to blame for this fundamentally. And if I do get into it, no one's saying that this is wrong.' And I think our laws need to reflect something of more -- moral values that say, 'Look, there's something not good here for the individuals, and there's something that you're responsible, as an individual, to see in that law and to respond appropriately.'

Rev. RICHARDSON: But a church, instead of moralizing about this and instead of judging people, needs to have a better understanding of the dynamics of addiction and then provide tools for people to get well. And that's where we really have fallen down, I believe.

MARTINEZ: Prop 36 is similar to a law passed four years ago in Arizona. On November 7th, Californians will make their own moral choice on the issue. For RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY, this is Ruben Martinez in Los Angeles.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP