Read
extended excerpts from RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY
managing editor Kim Lawton's interview with Wesley Seminary
Professor Shaun Casey about religion, politics, and President
George W. Bush:
President Bush has a deep set of ties to a wide swath of
people in the evangelical community. His own personal conversion
at the age of 40 came after conversations with the Rev.
Billy Graham and as a result of a community Bible study
he was a part of in Midland, Texas. A few years later, in
1988, he was in charge of relations with evangelical leaders
for his father's presidential campaign, and he established
a vast network of relationships with a variety of leaders
who have been very influential on him in subsequent years.
The most dramatic manifestations [of President Bush's religious
conversion] were in his own personal life. He stopped drinking.
He stopped smoking. And by all accounts he became much more
serious about his role as a husband and father. It also
had some impact on his politics, but it's less clear exactly
to what extent ... certainly he's taken a very strong stand
on abortion as a pro-life advocate. He's also taken a strong
stand as an advocate of the use of the death penalty in
the state of Texas, and he directly ties those [stands]
to his evangelical faith.
To what extent does his religion make a difference for his
politics? If you look at the way he ran the campaign, he
reached out to African-American religious leaders, to conservative
Catholics, and to a variety of evangelical leaders. The
first two strategies didn't pay many dividends. The work
he has to do politically at this point is to reach out to
a wider section of America's religious establishment than
simply the conservative Protestants. And it's not clear
how far or how effecitvely he's going to be doing that.
People tend to be very cynical when you display your personal
piety for what seems to be political profit in the short
run. Americans are turned off by that. In some sense, they
are afraid of very particular, specific expressions of religious
piety. There's a fine line that all politicians have to
tread between the particularity of their faith and how they
display it in any kind of public forum. President Bush obviously
has a lot of work to do with mainstream Christian Protestant
denominations, with liberal Catholics, with Jews, and with
members of the world religions that are now growing at fast
rates in America. He has a lot of territory to cover to
reach out to those groups.
It's difficult to see a direct connection between the teachings
of the Methodist church, President Bush's political stance,
and his expressions of piety. It seems that the bulk of
the influence upon him spiritually has come more from evangelical
sources and less from mainstream Protestantism.
There are three parts to the genius of John Wesley's thought
and the tradition he established. Methodism is a religion
of the heart; there's a serious piety there. But it's also
melded with a serious pursuit of the intellect. The mind
is also a very strong part of the Wesleyan tradition. The
third component is a strong call for social justice and
outreach. There was a concern for the poor at the beginning
of Wesley's ministry that has run through the history of
the United Methodist Church. There is a wonderful opportunity
for President Bush to draw upon that. Clearly he uses the
language of the heart. That's part of his vocabulary in
most every political setting. What remains to be seen is
whether he draws upon the actual Social Priniciples that
have been written by his church, which talk about how to
engage that piety in the political world. He has a reservoir
to draw upon there. It's not clear to what extent he will.


