Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Donate Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories
Headlines
Election Coverage
Calendar
TV Schedule
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
For Teachers
Resources
Feedback

NEWS:
Spirituality of President Bush
January 19, 2001    Episode no. 421
Read stories by week: 
Go
RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY asked a group of Methodist religious leaders to comment on the significance of Methodist social teaching for President George W. Bush and his public policies:


Robin W. Lovin
Dean and Professor of Ethics
Perkins School of Theology
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, Texas


Like most faithful United Methodists, George W. Bush knows his church less for its doctrine and Social Principles than for its points of connection with his own life and experience. United Methodism, along with evangelical Protestantism, generally believes in the power of faith to transform lives. United Methodism's distinctive emphasis has been that this transformation is seen less in instantaneous conversion than in a lifetime of disciplined practice and personal growth, lived out within a community. We will see President Bush's United Methodist experience expressed in a confidence -- which will sometimes seem naïve to others -- that these personal transformations are possible. We will see it in his commitment to civic organizations, community groups, and faith-based programs that nurture these transformations effectively. That leaves a lot of room for disagreement about specific policy questions. (United Methodists are familiar with those disagreements in their local congregations.) But it does suggest basic interests in education, opportunities for children, and the renewal of communities at the grass-roots level. The United Methodist experience of pluralism, diversity, and openness to change may also lie behind the new President's confidence that partisanship can be transformed into a practical consensus on the common good. That, too, may seem naïve to some, but both Mr. Bush's presidency and Mr. Bush's denomination need a good deal of confidence that it is possible.


Lovett H. Weems, Jr.
President
Saint Paul School of Theology
Kansas City, Missouri

Our new president is a United Methodist and, apparently, a devoted and committed member. How much will United Methodist principles influence the president's approach to public policy issues? If history is a guide, the answer is "not much." Americans are of two minds about the place of a president's religion in the conduct of public policy. We want a president with religious faith, but we do not want the president's particular religious faith to determine public policy. Many Americans were relieved that John F. Kennedy was not "too Catholic" in his decisions as president. People understood Richard M. Nixon's Quaker faith, though few expected "Quaker" peace policies from him. Though a president is shaped by a religious tradition, that tradition may not shape public policy directions the president takes. In the tradition of John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, such an approach might not be all bad. Wesley had strong moral positions, but when he moved into the public arena, he was clear that these positions were appropriate for public policy only to the extent that they served the common good. When Wesley encouraged public action, the basis was his belief that the common good is the responsibility of all public servants.


Kevin R. Armstrong
Minister of Faith and Public Life
North United Methodist Church
Indianapolis, Indiana

The United Methodist Social Principles, which address human issues from a biblical and theological foundation, are generally unknown and largely without influence among most of our members, including President Bush. Using these principles as the primary standard for evaluating the church's influence on the president's public policy, however, ignores another level of influence President Bush cedes to the church. It is true that Governor Bush rebuffed his bishop's call for a moratorium on state executions. As chief executive of Texas, he promoted public policies that most observers would find inconsistent with the church's official positions on education, healthcare, abortion, and the environment. But there are other ways George W. Bush reflects his Methodist heritage. Methodism began as a reform movement after Anglican priest John Wesley had an experience that "strangely warmed" his heart. Wesley's aim was "to reform the nation and spread Scriptural holiness." When the President-elect talks of faith, he recounts the conversion experience that "changed my heart" and makes clear that he is intent on reforming himself and his people. The United Methodist Social Principles are written by a governing body that sees religion and government as agents of social transformation. For George W. Bush, and many of his fellow United Methodists, religion and government are agents of personal transformation. Faith-based partnerships are not first about social change and institutional capacity but about emphasizing the personal ramifications of faith. John Wesley said, "If your heart is as mine, give me your hand." When it comes to public policy, count on the president to emphasize the heart, not the Social Principles.


Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
Ted A. Campbell
Professor of the History of Christianity
Wesley Theological Seminary
Washington, D.C.

The essence of the historic Methodist ethos could be described as a combination of rather conservative personal morality and rather more progressive social morality, both of these blended together with a strong mixture of heartfelt religious faith. The personal-morality side was sometimes parodied as "Don't drink, don't smoke, don't chew, and don't go with girls that do." On the social side, Methodists consistently took a progressive and optimistic attitude toward social issues, with Methodist women's groups particularly involved in progressive causes such as the abolition of child labor, the amelioration of conditions for workers, and advocacy of the civil rights movement.

In Texas, Methodists often positioned themselves against Baptists, seeing themselves as eminently more progressive (although Texas Baptists have shown their own streak of progressivism in the last few years). Former Senator John Tower's father, Dr. Joe Z. Tower, was the leader of the group described as "Old-Style Liberals" in the Texas Annual Conference of the Methodist Church. It is not surprising to me that his son John became a Republican: through much of twentieth-century history in Texas (when yellow-dog Democrats were rampant), to be a Republican was a rather progressive thing in itself.

There is a sense in which George W. Bush's "compassionate conservativism" does express the old Methodist ethos, and I have no doubt that he has embraced this ethos wholeheartedly. Episcopalians make wonderful Methodists. Not surprisingly, George W. Bush's autobiography, A CHARGE TO KEEP, takes its title from a Charles Wesley hymn much beloved by Methodist people.


James Winkler
General Secretary
United Methodist General Board of Church and Society
Washington, D.C.

I fervently hope that President Bush will take the church's Social Principles seriously as he carries on the work of his administration. The Social Principles are intended to be instructive and persuasive in the best of the prophetic spirit. The public witness of the United Methodist Church is first and foremost judged by God by whether it supports justice, love, and mercy, particularly for the poor and powerless. That seems to me to be an excellent benchmark for the church and for any U.S. president, especially a United Methodist.


The Rev. Will Willimon
Dean of the Chapel and Professor of Christian Ministry
Duke University


George W. Bush may represent the best, and some of the worst, of us United Methodists. He seems to have gone through a fairly dramatic turnaround in his own life -- a conversion. And we Wesleyans have always been big on conversions. About every other sentence, he says he is speaking "from the heart," and we are people of the warmed heart. His piety, his willingness to make religion something that is deeply felt, and his unashamed linking of his personal faith with public responsibilities all seem very Methodist to me. However, one does not see much Methodist conversionism in his social thought. He keeps his faith personal and individual. We Methodists are big on social holiness, and George doesn't seem to have read or heeded our stands on capital punishment, social legislation, and so forth. In the election, there were many who worried about Mr. Lieberman. "What if we go to war on a Friday? He's a Jew, will he be unable to order killing on the Sabbath?" I found it a bit embarrassing, as a Methodist, that no one asked, "What if we go to war on a Sunday? George W. is a Christian, a Methodist. Those people have some odd ideas about war, capital punishment, and abortion. Can we count on him to act as if he were not really a Methodist?" In my recollection, no one asked such questions. Which is not only a vivid testimonial to how little George W. is a Methodist, but also to how accommodated and acculturated we Methodists have become. Today, to be a Methodist is to be nobody too special. George W. Bush, and we, have made Methodism a lot less interesting than it ought to be.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP