|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
NEWS:
Crisis in Sudan
April 27, 2001 Episode no. 435
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
BOB ABERNETHY (anchor): Some of the loudest voices
urged more U.S. action in the humanitarian crisis in Sudan.
An increasingly diverse coalition, led by church groups,
is mobilizing new pressure to end the ongoing suffering
in that Horn of Africa nation. Kim Lawton reports on the
grassroots campaign and this foreign policy dilemma.
KIM
LAWTON: In front of the Sudanese Embassy in Washington,
cries for an end to genocide, persecution, and slavery in
Sudan. The Church Alliance for a New Sudan promises regular
protests and acts of civil disobedience to ratchet up attention
to their cause. They're also urging the U.S. government
to take stronger steps to end the suffering.
DIANE KNIPPERS (protestor): We're demanding so much
more from our government.
LAWTON: For the past 18 years, Sudan has been locked
in [a] civil war between the National Islamic Front government,
in the north, and the largely Christian and animist south.
More than two million people have been killed and four million
 displaced,
most in the south. According to human rights groups, civilian
targets -- hospitals, schools, and churches -- are routinely
bombed. Women and children are abducted and sold into slavery.
Evangelist Franklin Graham, son of [the Reverend] Billy
Graham, is one of the leading voices urging a solution.
FRANKLIN GRAHAM (Evangelist): In ... Sudan, I have
black brothers and sisters in the same faith, and somebody
needs to speak out on their behalf.
LAWTON: Surprisingly diverse allies are speaking
out with him. Singer Michael Jackson says he'll go to Sudan
next month to call attention to ongoing slavery.
A delegation representing the U.S. Catholic Bishops visited
the region earlier this month. One of the delegation members
shot this video. They called on the U.S. government to help
negotiate an immediate U.N.-monitored cease-fire.
Others are urging even stronger action.
|
 |
 |
 |
GRAHAM:
The United States needs to take the lead here morally and
do everything in its power, to use its economic power
and its diplomatic power, to bring this to an end, and I
believe at the last resort, we always have the military
option.
LAWTON: There is widespread agreement that the situation
in Sudan is desperate. The problem for policymakers is deciding
what to do about it. Some foreign policy experts say the
complexities of the situation demand a pragmatic approach.
DR. J. STEPHEN MORRISON (Center for Strategic and
International Studies): We need to show leadership. There's
no question. I think that's a point of consensus. The question
is, what has been attempted and why did it not generate
results, and what are the alternatives now?
LAWTON: The Bush Administration is trying to hammer
out a Sudan policy that addresses the religious, political,
and tribal factors fueling the conflict ... a policy that
takes into account what America can, and would be willing,
to do. Some advocates worry the government too often uses
the complexity to avoid action.
GRAHAM: This is evil and the United States, regardless
of how complex the issues are, we should not stand by and
just say, well this is complicated, and we should think
about this before we do anything. Listen, two million people
have died here.
LAWTON: Morrison cautions that any American action
must be well thought-out, so it doesn't backfire.
DR. MORRISON: What is the level of investment that
would be required to reverse the situation? And if we're
not really prepared to do that, but talking rhetorically
in that area, is that having inadvertent, very negative
consequences?
LAWTON: As officials debate the next diplomatic steps,
grassroots activists are pledging to keep up the pressure,
so the people directly affected by those policies aren't
forgotten.
I'm Kim Lawton in Washington.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|