Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

COVER STORY:
Foster Care
June 8, 2001    Episode no. 441
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
BOB ABERNETHY, anchor: Frequently, we hear in the news media of a child severely abused -- sometimes killed by a parent with a history of neglect or worse. Often the question is asked: "Did the social welfare system fail its obligation to protect the child?"

Kids at a group homeThere's a tension between respecting parental rights and protecting children from abuse. The options are limited. The difficult decisions are made by underpaid social workers with more cases than they can handle. But at the heart is the difficulty of rendering the wisest decision within the limited choices available. Betty Rollin reports.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: She has bruising that are discolored, red, purple, and blue on her arms, the inner part of her arms and on her thighs.

BETTY ROLLIN: The hotline at Fulton County's Department of Family and Children Services gets about 600 calls a month. Case workers who are sent out to investigate must decide whether the abuse or neglect is great enough to remove children from their homes.

Case worker Sharon McMath is about to check up on a family that's been teetering on the edge for 6 years -- a mother and her four sons.

Sharon McMathSHARON MCMATH (Case Worker Manager): Hey, Wesley how are you doing, where's mama? Come on out of the street.

The mother has a long-term drug history. Her last two children were born drug positive. She would go off and leave them for days at a time and she misused the welfare check to do drugs. She's doing good at this moment but we've had peaks and valleys with her.

(to Kim Davis) Have you been going to your meetings?

KIM DAVIS: I work my program. I'm eight months clean so I'm working on it, I'm doing what I'm supposed to do.

MS. MCMATH (to Ms. Davis' son, Eros): Do you have any concerns whether your mama is working her program or not?

EROS MCMATH: No, my mom is doing great and I hope she will stay that way.

ROLLIN: But will she? Or will Sharon ultimately be forced to do what no one wants -- take Kim's children away from her.

MS. MCMATH: She's held a good job now, so I'm hopeful.

ROLLIN (to Ms. McMath): Are you worried besides being hopeful?

MS. MCMATH: There's always a worry that it only takes one more time to use to get strung out again.

ROLLIN: The mandate of the child welfare system is to protect children while respecting parental rights. Case workers who must deal with this conflict, are often reluctant to remove children from their homes.

Beverly Jones still remembers her first removal. No matter how abused, the children are seldom grateful.

Beverly JonesBEVERLY JONES (Fulton County Department of Children and Family Services): Even though that was the most appropriate thing to do, I'll never forget those children and the way they looked at me. That stays with you.

ROLLIN: Yet given the risks, leaving the family intact can be unsettling as well.

MS. JONES: Can I walk away, leave this child at home, and at night be able to sleep and not worry that I made the wrong decision?

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
PROFESSOR RICHARD GELLES (University of Pennsylvania School of Social Work): Keeping the family intact is a long-term cultural bias and its supported by the Constitution, which gives parents a great deal of freedom to raise children without government interference.

ROLLIN: That bias, says Gelles, can lead case workers to err on the side of what is called family preservation.

PROFESSOR GELLES: I really do believe that even the better trained social workers are not cautious enough, that they feel that "if I bring my good intentions and the resources of the system to bare," most people will want to be good parents and will change. The scientific reality is that change is a difficult process.

ROLLIN (to Ms. Jones): Are we sometimes sentimental about a mother's instincts?

MS. JONES: Absolutely. I think most of us think everyone wants to parent and who would not want to parent, particularly mothers? There's what's called a mother's instinct and it will just kick in sooner or later and that's not the case. And I think it's hard for us to recognize that and accept that.

ROLLIN: Especially, says Gelles, if the worker is overworked and inexperienced.

Professor GellesPROFESSOR GELLES: Carrying out these tasks frequently are youngsters who are called social workers but who are not, who have not been professionally trained in social work, who are at the bottom rung of the system, are paid very poorly, and are required to make decisions that they don't have the technology or the knowledge or the training to make.

ROLLIN: Children who are removed from their homes are placed with relatives, or foster families, or in a group home like this. More than half a million children are in foster care in America -- 2000 in this one county in Georgia. For most of them, foster care is, at least, a safer place than home. Still, most are returned to their homes and of those, 40 percent wind up back in foster care -- older now, their chances of adoption fading. Warrell is one of 11 children, all in foster care.

WARRELL: I got to wait until my mother get her life straight and whatever she's got to do right now, she can do it now, while I'm here.

ROLLIN: Federal legislation now mandates, that with some exceptions, that after 12 months in foster care, a decision must be made either to return a child to the family or to terminate parental rights.

MS. JONES: Is it realistic to expect them in 12 months to be all together? All my substance abuse experts will tell you "no." But, they are trying. Do you go forward and terminate their rights or do you give them more time?

ROLLIN (to Ms. Jones): Because more time can mean that the child doesn't get adopted?

MS. JONES: That's right.

ROLLIN: Meanwhile, foster care is the only option for most of these children. If they are lucky, the foster care is neither long-term, nor itself, as it is in isolated cases, abusive.

TerrellTERRELL (16-year-old boy): I feel safer here because I don't have to worry about whether my parents are going to get drunk or hurt me or my little sister.

ROLLIN: The goal is to close Kim's case by the fall. Whichever way it goes, the caseworker says she will not rest easy.

For RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY, I'm Betty Rollin in Atlanta.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP