|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
PERSPECTIVES:
Religious Extremism
October 12, 2001 Episode no. 506
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
ABERNETHY: Last weekend, many Americans were chilled
by the videotape of Osama bin Laden threatening the U.S.
and claiming the world is now divided between believers
and infidels. Apparently fearing such broadcasts could unleash
new terrorism, the White House asked the five commercial
TV networks to review any future such tapes before airing
them. The networks agreed. Meanwhile, what are Bin Laden's
grievances? How representative are they of what most Muslims
believe, and what does that imply for the U.S.? Maysam al
Faruqi teaches Islamic Religious Thought and Practice at
Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. Bruce Lawrence
is professor of Islamic Studies and Chair of the Department
of Religion at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.
Welcome to you both. Professor Lawrence, Bin Laden spoke
of what he called Islam's humiliation for more than 80 years.
What was he talking about?
DR. BRUCE LAWRENCE (Duke University): He was talking
about the end of World War I, the defeat of the German powers,
the powers allied with them, and also the Ottoman Empire.
He was referring to the humiliation of the Ottoman Empire,
which was the dominant Muslim power in the world up through
World War I. And in the aftermath of World War I, it was
carved up into separate states: Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and
Palestine. And for him, this is a humiliation, not just
for the Ottoman Empire but for the whole Muslim world.
ABERNETHY: Professor Al Faruqi, what other complaints
did you hear in Bin Laden's statement?
DR. MAYSAM AL FARUQI (Georgetown University): He
addressed specifically the issue of Palestine and Israel.
The issue of U.S. troops in Arabia and the Iraqi problem.
The sanctions on Iraq, which have caused the civilians'
deaths in Iraq, and the presence of U.S. troops in Arabia.
ABERNETHY: And these things are problems because
they remind him of the colonial days, the loss of dignity,
the loss of control?
AL FARUQI: The loss of control over one's faith.
The Arab world was basically taken -- the whole Muslim world
-- was taken over by colonial powers that ruled over it
and dismantled the old regimes, the old social structure
and replaced it with something completely different. And
that was felt as a loss of control, and that has continued
with present issues in Iraq, in Palestine, in Arabia. The
presence of U.S. troops in Arabia is seen as the symbol
of the loss of control over the heart of Islam in Arabia,
not being able to defend ...
ABERNETHY: Holy ground.
AL FARUQI: The holy ground, not being able to defend
one's self there.
ABERNETHY: Bruce Lawrence, to what extent do you
think Bin Laden's grievances are shared by most other Muslims?
LAWRENCE: I think they are shared because of his
language and because of his appeal to grievances that echo
not only the aftermath of World War I but what he often
refers to as the Zionist Crusader Alliance, referring back
to the Crusades in the 11th and 12th centuries and linking
that with Zionism in the middle of the 20th century.
ABERNETHY: Do you think that's shared by most --
Do you think most Muslims see it that way?
|
 |
 |
 |
LAWRENCE: No, I don't think most Muslims see it that
way, but they do feel the loss of control, as Professor
al Faruqi said, and this loss of control has a historic
background. And to the extent that he shorthands it, he
makes images which appeal to people who have grievances
on other counts.
ABERNETHY: Now, nothing. ... I'm sorry. ...
AL FARUQI: The grievances are shared. It is the methods
that Bin Laden uses to respond to them that is absolutely
rejected by the majority of Muslims. But they want to have
those grievances addressed and resolved. They want the issue
in Palestine to be resolved. Palestinians were denied the
rights to their homeland, the refugees are in refugee camps
for 50 years. ...
ABERNETHY: Do you feel in order to fight terrorism,
the United States needs to do something about these other
grievances?
AL FARUQI: Extremists are always going to hijack
certain issues, which are real issues, and use them for
their own purposes. This should not be allowed. And an act
of terrorist[s] should always be fault [sic] and justice
must be established, whether it is an act by Muslims, or
Christians, or Jews, or whatever, acts against civilians
should not be tolerated, ever. However, the simmering of
those issues that lead to this anger, this poison that has
been basically increasing throughout the years in the Muslim
world, those issues that lead to these acts should be addressed.
ABERNETHY: Professor Lawrence, do you agree that
in order to deal with all this, the U.S. must change policies
in order to address grievances?
LAWRENCE: Yes, I think we need to change policies,
but we also need to acknowledge that we have done some things
right. We need to build not only a coalition of interest
but also a coalition of values, and to do that means we
look at some of the judgments we've made, particularly in
the foreign policy area towards Palestine, and towards Iraq,
and towards the Indian subcontinent. We need to rethink
how we relate to rulers, not all of whom share our values
even though right now their interests and ours coincide.
I think we have to remain committed and we have to seek
peace with justice and also order with equity if are to
get through and win this war morally, and not just militarily.
ABERNETHY: Professor Al Faruqi, do you want to comment
on that?
AL FARUQI: If mistakes are made, they should be acknowledged
and we should work with other people for a world order and
for world peace. Not in reaction to terrorist acts, but
basically because this is the right thing to do. It is necessary
to basically respond to needs of people around the world
and justice, and establish justice throughout the world.
ABERNETHY: Many thanks to both of you. To Bruce Lawrence
of Duke University and Maysam al Faruqi of Georgetown University.
LAWRENCE: Thank you, Bob.
AL FARUQI: Thank you.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|

|

|

|
 |
Related Readings:
SHATTERING THE MYTH: ISLAM BEYOND VIOLENCE
by Bruce B. Lawrence
DEFENDERS OF GOD: THE FUNDAMENTALIST REVOLT AGAINST THE MODERN AGE
by Bruce B. Lawrence
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|