|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
COVER STORY:
India's Muslims
October 26, 2001 Episode no. 508
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
BOB ABERNETHY (anchor): Next, reaction from India
to events in Afghanistan. India was an early supporter of
the U.S.-led war on terrorism. However, the U.S. has seemed
to rely more heavily on arch-rival Pakistan. We have a report
from Fred De Sam Lazaro.
FRED DE SAM LAZARO: It's become a familiar sight
across the Muslim world -- worshippers fired up by imams
after Friday services, chanting slogans against America,
against Israel, for the Taliban.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: Osama bin Laden was a creation
of America; now he has turned against them and they are
crying. I think the whole thing is against Islam.
DE SAM LAZARO: We spoke to this man outside Delhi's
main mosque, built at the same time as the Taj Mahal 400
years ago. Like the surrounding Muslim community, it is
the legacy of the Mughals, who reigned here for three centuries
before the British colonized India.

In numbers, India has one of the world's largest Muslim
populations. At 130 million, it's second only to Indonesia
-- more than any Arab state.
But many Indian Muslim leaders insist this fiery rhetoric
reflects only a small minority of their generally liberal
community. In 1947, the departing British partitioned the
country to create the Islamic state of Pakistan, but many
Muslims, by choice or circumstance, stayed on in India.
MR. SALMAN KHURSHID: If their forefathers decided
they wanted to stay with 80 percent Hindus rather than 100
percent Muslims, go to Pakistan -- if they decided to stay
here, it means they're liberal, it means they want a secular
country, they want a country that isn't dominated by religion.
DE SAM LAZARO: India is a democracy, with no official
religion, but it hasn't been free of religious strife. In
spite of their large population, Muslims are outnumbered
six to one by Hindus. In recent years, the country has seen
a rising influence of Hindu nationalist parties ... who want
a more Hindu, less secular India.
And when nationalist Hindus see these fundamentalist Muslim
demonstrations, they brand all Muslims as unpatriotic or
sympathetic with Pakistan, leaving moderate Islamic leaders
in the middle, according to Salman Khurshid.
MR. KHURSHID: We get rapped from the majority, saying
"This is what your Muslims are saying." If we come to their
defense, we become targets ourselves. If we don't defend
them, we become alienated from our community. They're destroying
the basic links between the majority and the minority by
taking these extreme positions, positions in which they
cannot achieve anything. I mean, if they want to do that,
they should just get together and go to Afghanistan and
fight the Americans. They only make speeches in the streets
of Delhi.
|
 |
 |
 |
DE SAM LAZARO: On most days, life in the streets
of Delhi's Muslim quarter goes on as it always has.
Opinion we sampled randomly seemed no different than that
heard generally in India: cautious support for the U.S and
opposition expressed in antiwar, rather than Islamic, terms.
(To unidentified man): What was the reaction here to the
World Trade Center bombing?
UNIDENTIFIED
MAN #2: It is not a good thing, nobody can support it.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN #3: This war should be stopped for
the civilians, for the peace[ful] people, because American
people are also very peace[ful] people. That's why I say,
please stop the war.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN #4: India has already told that
in Kashmir and other places so many terrorists are already
coming; nobody listen to it. Now, when thing happen at U.S.A.,
everybody is saying there is a terrorist, there is a terrorist.
DE SAM LAZARO: Many Indians see the U.S.-led war
on terrorism as a vindication of India's long-held position.
Tens of thousands of Indian lives have [been] lost in various
separatist conflicts, including the one over Kashmir, an
area claimed by both India and Pakistan. India supports
the U.S.-led military action, calling itself a victim of
terrorism.
MR. KULDIP NAYYAR (Columnist/author): Terrorism,
if it is allowed to breed in one country, at one place,
is going to spread out, and this fundamentalism of any kind,
of any religion, whether it is Hindu, Muslim, Christian,
Jew, everything -- that's not the thing, because it doesn't
fit with a democracy.
DE SAM LAZARO: Indo-Pakistani tensions flared up
recently, after a suicide bombing killed 38 people in Srinagar,
capital of Indian Kashmir. A Pakistan-based group was implicated
in the blast.
The U.S. urged India not to respond militarily, but last
week Indian forces attacked Pakistani positions across the
Kashmir line of control. Muslim leader Khurshid says India
resents being asked to stand by helplessly.
MR.
KHURSHID: Somebody walks into your living room, you're
told not to be on the doorstep. You can drive them out,
not beyond the doorstep. And when the U.S. is hit, it can
cross seven seas to hit the enemy. Why these double standards?
Why the double standards? We are perturbed about Pakistan
harboring terrorists who would hit India. Everyone wants
Osama; nobody wants the people who inflicted pain and injury
to us. They are in Pakistan, they are in Sri Lanka, they
are sitting in other places and nobody is talking about
them.
DE SAM LAZARO: In the end, many here say that the
course and length of the American-led war on terrorism will
determine if pro-Taliban rallies remain relatively isolated
-- or if they grow into a larger, anti-American sentiment
in an India frustrated that the global war on terrorism
doesn't target groups it has fingered as terrorist.
For RELIGION & ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY, this is Fred De Sam
Lazaro, in Hyderabad, India.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Related Books:
THE IDEA OF INDIA
by Sunil Khilnani
A HISTORY OF INDIA
by Stanley Wolpert
INDIA: A HISTORY
by John Keay
MULLAHS ON THE MAINFRAME: ISLAM AND MODERNITY AMONG THE DAUDI BOHRAS
by Jonah Blank
INDIA: A MOSAIC
edited by Robert B. Silvers and Barbara Epstein
INDIA: THE GOLDEN JUBILEE
(Volume 57 of GRANTA, the literary periodical)
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|

|

|

|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|