 |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |
COVER STORY: The Ethics of Cloning July 12, 2002 Episode no. 545
|  |
|
 |  |  |
 |
BOB ABERNETHY, anchor: Many scientists say the most promise for curing
various diseases is to clone human embryos. Not clone them to create a new human
being, reproductive cloning, but clone them to cure the sick Ð therapeutic
cloning. But therapeutic cloning is sharply controversial because it destroys the
original human embryo, and that, say many ethicists, is taking a life.
Lucky Severson reviews the therapeutic cloning debate, and let me acknowledge a
strong personal interest in it. The man who wants so much to have medical help
is my cousin.
LUCKY SEVERSON: It's a familiar scene in Wenhem, Massachusetts: The
Reverend Ann Abernethy, walking beside her husband, the Reverend William
Abernethy, to the church where she is the pastor. Both are United Church of
Christ pastors. He has suffered from Parkinson's disease for 20 years.
Reverend WILLIAM ABERNETHY: It makes me furious to have that disease; to
wake up in the morning and find yourself shaking so that you can't do what you
want to do; to find yourself adjusting to a new inability to work and walk and
talk and laugh.
SEVERSON: He says he will try anything that offers hope. He's had two
brain operations, which have worked for some patients, but not for him. Now he is
holding onto the hope offered by therapeutic cloning. And in Reverend Abernethy's
view, it is research that has God's blessing.

Rev. ABERNETHY: To have a possibility to make human life better and not
use it is as much sin as anything I can think of. Denying what God has made
available to us, the abundant life Christ promises, is transgressing what God has
called us to be.
SEVERSON: For all its mystery, therapeutic cloning is not a scientifically
complicated process, at least in its initial stage. Researchers remove the
nucleus of a woman's egg and replace it with a cell from the patient. The egg is
then placed in a Petri dish and the cell in it is stimulated to divide for five
days. It's these cloned embryonic stem cells that have the potential, scientists
believe, to cure a variety of diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's and
other illnesses. The cells would be implanted without the patient's body
rejecting them.
So the embryo is first created and then destroyed to obtain the needed stem
cells, and that worries Leon Kass. He's chairman of the President's Council on
Bioethics.

Dr. LEON KASS (Biologist and Chair, President's Council on Bioethics):
Judaism, which is my religion, does not believe that this is a human being, but
as a biologist, I've come to somehow regard the earliest stages of human life as
not humanly nothing. It's something, and if nothing obstructs its unfolding
itself [it can] become something like you and me, if all goes well.
SEVERSON: And Leon Kass is not alone. Theology professor Gilbert
Meilaender at Valparaiso University is on the President's Council. He believes
the tiny cloned embryo is a human life and deserves protection.
Professor GILBERT MEILAENDER (Theology Department, Valparaiso University):
The simple fact that someone is little and undeveloped at this point doesn't mean
that they somehow lack equality and dignity with someone who is big and strong
and smart.
SEVERSON: Many, if not most scientists take a different point of view. Dr.
George Daley is a stem cell expert with the Whitehead Institute at MIT.

Dr. GEORGE DALEY (Whitehead Institute, MIT): We are talking about embryos
that are smaller than the period at the end of a sentence -- the cells that exist
as individual elements in the Petri dish. Cells that I can extract from your skin
and place in a Petri dish and reactivate. I don't think those are beings.
SEVERSON: Meilaender the theologian compares the vulnerability of an
embryo to that of Christ on the cross. He believes those among us who are
suffering, such as Reverend Abernethy, deserve help, but not if the moral cost is
too high.
Prof. MEILAENDER: Suffering is a terrible thing and we must relieve it as
much as we can, but who would want to live in a society which thought that the
relief of suffering was the highest good, and that one ought never accept
suffering in order to achieve some other goal? I wouldn't think that would be a
very noble society at all.
Rev. ANN ABERNETHY (First Church in Wenham): Is that not the higher good,
that we need to take the lives that we are kind of committed to care for and to
do the best we can to provide quality of life for them, as opposed to putting our
weight on the lives that aren't viable yet?
|  |  |  |
SEVERSON: It's also what's down the road of genetics that concerns Gilbert
Meilaender.
Prof. MEILAENDER: What we really have would be a whole industry of cloned
embryos that we produced to use as raw materials for our research, and that would
worry me in its own right but also because... it would lead to reproductive
cloning.
SEVERSON: It didn't help alleviate those fears when the renegade doctor
Severino Antinori in Italy announced that he plans to clone five human babies by
the end of the year.
The vast majority of Americans are strongly opposed to reproductive cloning, but
most support therapeutic cloning. President Bush opposes both types and announced
his beliefs even before his council went to work.
President GEORGE W. BUSH: Anything other than a total ban on human cloning
would be unethical. Research cloning would contradict the most fundamental
principle of medical ethics: that no human life should be exploited or
extinguished for the benefit of another.
SEVERSON: Last year the House of Representatives approved a bill that
would criminalize all forms of cloning, the first time in this country scientific
research has ever been totally banned. And then a bill in the Senate sponsored by
Kansas Senator Sam Brownback promised the same total ban.
Senator SAM BROWNBACK: The principle being denied in this case is the
dignity of the young human, effectively making the human embryo equal to mere
plant or animal life or property.
Dr. DALEY: Well, obviously if there's a criminalization of research on
these very, very early stages of human embryos or on the use of nuclear transfer,
cloning to create these human embryos, this very promising new area of
biomedicine will not go forward in the U.S.
SEVERSON: But the momentum started to shift when Utah Senator Orrin Hatch,
a Mormon, whose church opposes cloning, said he would co-sponsor a bill that
would allow some forms of therapeutic cloning.
Sen. ORRIN HATCH: I believe a human's life begins in a womb, not in a
Petri dish or a refrigerator.
SEVERSON: So for Reverend Abernethy and the others with diseases that
might be cured, the prospect of therapeutic cloning stays alive, but not without
serious opposition.
Dr. KASS: There is Alzheimer's in my family, and all the stars are that
it's in my future. I am not cavalier about what's at stake here, but it's also --
it seems to me very important that we pursue these means, these cures in a way
that doesn't cheapen the kind of life that we have to live longer in.
Dr. DALEY: Therapeutic cloning, I believe, is not dehumanizing. I believe
it is using a technology to treat real patients, patients in need.
SEVERSON: For the opponents the argument almost always goes back to
protecting the tiny embryo they see as a human life, and what would happen to our
society if we allow therapeutic cloning.
Prof. MEILEANDER: I think it would diminish us. It would suggest a kind of
crassness, a willingness to use nascent human life simply as a resource for our
purposes.
Rev. ANN ABERNETHY: I don't see human science as separated from God.
That's God's gift, and caring is God's gift, and compassion is God's
gift.
SEVERSON: For Reverend Abernethy, the hope that's dangling out there was
put there, he has come to believe, by a compassionate God.
Rev. WILLIAM ABERNETHY: What I found myself saying, in spite of myself,
was, "God, if you could heal me, why didn't you?" And that anger was very
difficult for me to deal with for several months. For the most part that is
lifted. It's almost as though God would say things to me which made sense
rationally, but he said it in a tone of voice that was immensely compassionate.
And that's been very important to me, that kind of experience. It makes me feel
deeply a part of God's love. So whatever happens in the next few years -- stem
cells or whatever -- I will celebrate it, I hope.
SEVERSON: The celebration for Reverend Abernethy, and the millions like
him who are waiting, is years away at the very earliest. For RELIGION &
ETHICS NEWSWEEKLY, I'm Lucky Severson in Wenham, Massachusetts.
|  |
 |  |  |
 |
 |
Related Links:
President's Council on
Bioethics
The White House: Remarks by the President on Stem Cell
Research, August 9, 2001
H.R. 2505: Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001
Christian Science Monitor: "Different faiths, different views on
stem cells" by Jane Lampman, July 23, 2001
The
Atlantic Monthly: "Cloning Trevor" by Kyla Dunn, June 2002
The Atlantic Monthly: "The Life (and Death?) of Cloning", May
22, 2002 An interview with author Kyla Dunn about the state of therapeutic-cloning research
and why it should not be banned.
National
Institutes of Health: "Stem Cells: A Primer"
Nature: The Genome
Gateway
Scientific American: "The First Human Cloned Embryo," November
24, 2001
Scientific American: "Therapeutic Cloning: How It's Done," November
24, 2001
Coalition for the
Advancement of Medical Research
American Life League: American
Bioethics Advisory Commission
Park Ridge Center for the
Study of Health, Faith and Ethics
Whitehead Institute/MIT
Center for Genome Research
Do No Harm: The Coalition
of Americans for Research Ethics
The National
Academies
Science and Christian
Faith
Pew
Forum on Religion and Public Life: Bioethics
CuresNow
|  |
 |  |
|  |
| 
| 
| 
|
 |
Related Books
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN CLONING by Leon Kass and James Q. Wilson
HUMAN CLONING: RELIGIOUS RESPONSES by Ronald Cole-Turner
THE HUMAN CLONING DEBATE edited by Glenn McGee
THE HUMAN EMBRYO RESEARCH DEBATES: BIOETHICS IN THE VORTEX OF CONTROVERSY by
Ronald M. Green
THE HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL DEBATE edited by Suzanne Holland, Karen Lebacqz and
Laurie Zoloth
JEWISH AND CATHOLIC BIOETHICS: AN ECUMENICAL DIALOGUE edited by Edmund D.
Pellegrino and Alan I. Faden
OUR POSTHUMAN FUTURE: CONSEQUENCES OF THE BIOTECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION by Francis
Fukuyama
WHO OWNS LIFE? edited by David Magnus, Arthur Caplan, and Glenn McGee
REDESIGNING HUMANS: OUR INEVITABLE GENETIC FUTURE by Gregory Stock
THEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN BIOETHICS edited by Andrew Lusting
|  |
 |  |
|  |
|
 |
 |  |  |
 
 |
|  |
 |  |
|
|