Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Cover
Feature

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

PERSPECTIVES:
Religious Responses to End of Life Issues
October 24, 2003    Episode no. 708
Read This Week's September 5, 2008
Go
Video - Watch this story
Requires Real Player
BOB ABERNETHY, anchor: Pro-lifers were also active in the dramatic legal and ethical battle in Florida over whether 39-year-old Terri Schiavo, who has been in a vegetative state for 13 years, should be allowed to die. Her husband, who is also her legal guardian, says she would have wanted that. But her parents say she should be kept alive, and so did the Florida legislature and Governor Jeb Bush. So a tube that had been supplying food and water was put back in.

We want to explore the religious and ethical issues in the case with James Walter, professor of theological studies and director of the Bioethics Institute at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Dr. Walter, welcome. If a person were in a coma and might recover, I assume everyone would want to keep that patient alive. But this case is different?

Photo of JAMES WALTER Dr. JAMES WALTER (Director, Bioethics Institute, Loyola Marymount University): Yes, I think it is. And the reason for that is the special medical situation in which Mrs. Schiavo finds herself. She is in what is called persistent vegetative state, which means that though she goes through wake cycles and looks alert, on the other hand, there is no awareness that is registered in her brain. And the reason for that is because the major portions of the brain have been so damaged that her chances of recovery from this, according to neurologists, to any significant life, is really minimal, if nil.

ABERNETHY: So in such a case, what are the ethical issues, the major ones?

Dr. WALTER: The major ones would be the value of human life. Some people want to grant an absolute value to life so that there is an absolute obligation to preserve that life. I think a number of people in society consider life a very fundamental value, but recognize that it is a relative good and, therefore, we have not absolute obligations to preserve it. The autonomy of the patient, or the decision-making process, is given to the patient or a surrogate and, in this case, Mr. Schiavo has legal guardianship over her medical decisions, and that is an important value to be respected.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
The issue of treatment versus care -- is artificially delivered water, nutrition, considered to be care? Is it like going into a patient's room and withdrawing a tray of food from a patient who is sitting up and ready to eat? Many people would say that this is not necessarily a form of care, but really a form of medical treatment and, therefore, under certain conditions can be withdrawn. Then we have to raise the question of the quality of life of Mrs. Schiavo and what that quality will be over the years in which she continues to live in this state.

ABERNETHY: And what do the major religious traditions have to say about all of this?

Photo of JAMES WALTER Dr. WALTER: Most of the religious traditions with which I'm familiar, the basic traditions within Christianity, within Islam, and within Judaism, all argue that life is an important value, but it is not an absolute value and, therefore, under certain stated conditions, nutrition and hydration that is delivered in the way it is to Mrs. Schiavo might be withdrawn. Because the Schiavos themselves are Catholic, and the family is Catholic, the Catholic tradition has argued that, though there is a presumption to offer this to Mrs. Schiavo, it is not an absolute obligation that it be done. The one exception might be Buddhism, which considers that the patient is not dead and, therefore, the patient should continue to be delivered the nutrients and the hydration, medically.

ABERNETHY: In his statement about the Schiavo case, Governor Bush urged people to prepare a living will or some other expression of their wishes. Do you agree with that?

Dr. WALTER: I do, and I think that the living will may not be the best instrument. I would recommend what is called a "durable power of attorney for health care," where I assign to someone who knows me and my values well, who will be present when these decisions have to be made, rather than me making a decision now, when I'm healthy, and 30 years from now I don't know in which condition I'm going to find myself. Someone who is actually going to be there speaking for me, I think, is a much better instrument.

ABERNETHY: Many thanks to Dr. James Walter at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

Dr. WALTER: You're welcome.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP