Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS
Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly -- An online companion to the weekly television news program
Keyword Search
Topic Index Stories by Week
Home
Current Stories

Perspectives
Profile
Web Exclusive
Survey

Headlines
Election Coverage
Special Issues
TV Schedule
Calendar
Newsletter
Subscribe or unsubscribe to the E-mail Newsletter, or edit your preferences.
The Series
About the Series
Funding
Biographies
Awards
Credits
For Teachers
Overview
Lesson Plan List
Tips
Teacher Resources
Resources
Viewer's Guides
Videotapes
Featured Sites
Feedback
Contact Us
Story Suggestions

INTERVIEW:
Bishop Gerald Kicanas
November 7, 2003    Episode no. 710
Read This Week's November 7, 2008
Go
Read more excerpts from Judy Valente's interview with Bishop Gerald Kicanas of Tucson, Arizona:

You've admitted the diocese made mistakes and publicly apologized. Was that painful for you to do?

I think this crisis has been a very difficult situation for me and certainly for many bishops because the issues involved are so subtle, so complex, and so diverse. A bishop is called to be a father, called to be a brother, called to be a friend, and trying to serve as a father, as a brother, as a friend is very difficult because sometimes people are hurt, sometimes wrong is done, and it's a struggle always to know how best to respond, how to respond justly to everyone involved, how not to leap to conclusions. So, yes, this has been very difficult in terms of the bishop's role, in terms of the life of the Church -- certainly a very difficult time for those who have been hurt, and yes, it's a complicated and very difficult area to navigate. But it can't be the only initiative the Church is involved in because the work of the Church is involved in education, involved in health care, involved in social justice, and [it] has to continue because the voice of the Church is very critical.

Just how consuming has the sexual abuse issue been?

It's a critical issue, and it does take time, and it does weigh on my mind and certainly does occupy the time of a number of people who are part of my staff. But it isn't all that I do. In fact, if I look day by day ... it could be days or weeks that this issue is not on the front burner, as it were, where I'm involved with working with ministers in various roles that they have, meeting with pastors.

I spend a great deal of time trying to nurture the spiritual lives of our priests because part of what the crisis moves us to as priests is a deeper relationship with the Lord, and a stronger bond of fraternity among priests. And so we have a monthly day of prayer for our priests now and they're committed to come. ... It's a full day of silence and prayer and reflection with the Lord.

I was able this year to preach our priests' retreat, which was kind of a scary thing because to preach to one's own can be very difficult. But it was a wonderful experience to be with our priests in prayer, so that's important to me -- how to help our priests, because they're struggling, too. It has been a very difficult time for many good priests, and to restore their confidence, to support them in their own faith journey is important.

But do you find it's a struggle to focus on other things?

Well, the crisis has to be attended to. It needs to be recognized. It needs to be dealt with. But it isn't all that occupies my time, because for many of our people, the crisis is still a remote situation. And it amazes me the steadfast faith of people and the resilience of the Church in dealing with these very painful situations. I think the Church recognizes the harm and hurt that have happened and [it] is trying very hard, as we are here in the diocese of Tucson, to set policies, to set procedures, to have oversight in ways that will prevent this from happening again. Or at least, if the abuse of a minor happens, it's responded to appropriately; authorities are alerted and the situation is dealt with.

But it just amazes me to see the vibrancy of the people's faith, and that's what's very encouraging. Despite the trauma of this crisis, the work of the Church continues. And I just find great support from the people, whose encouragement, whose support is as strong as ever.

Sometimes people say it's embarrassing to be a priest today. But I must say that has not been my experience. I wear the collar all the time, and I have traveled quite a bit. It almost seems that people go out of their way to say hello, to greet me, and they don't have a clue who I am other than I am a priest. ... I've never felt that people look down on me. I've never felt embarrassed. If anything, it's been the opposite experience, which is surprising, really, because there has been a great deal of hurt.

Are you treated differently in any way now?

I must say I feel a great deal of support by the people, by the priests here. They've been very welcoming. I'm a stranger. I've been here only two years. People don't know me, [don't] know much about me. I came out of nowhere and they graciously welcomed me. ... I hear again and again, "Bishop, this is a tough situation. We know that there have been difficulties, but I really appreciate your trying to address them and to move forward."

Do you think the bishops' moral authority has been eroded?

I think there has been disappointment on the part of many, in what has happened in this crisis. I feel disappointment. But, I must say, it cannot silence the voice of the Church. The Church has to speak up for the littlest and the weakest. ... Now that isn't to say the Church doesn't have to look at itself as well, because we would be hypocrites if we hold people to a standard that we ourselves do not try to live.

And even though we are all human, we all fail, bishops have limitations, priests have limitations, every human being has limitations ... we can't stop speaking out for issues that are critical, whether it's life issues or border issues.

Do you think bishops can speak with as much moral authority as they did before the sexual abuse scandal?

We have to, as bishops and as a church, do what is right and speak what is right regardless of what other people might think. Yes, some question the moral integrity of the Church, and the Church has to look at itself and seek conversion itself. But it also has to speak up and act for what is right, and I think that I can't be paralyzed or can't be limited, because without the voice of the Church, society will be missing an important moral imperative.

But is anybody listening?

I think that listening is based on influence and the ability to influence thinking. ... The Church does not have all the answers to society's problems; however, we do have a moral perspective that needs to be voiced. And to the extent that it is spoken in an influential way, I think it will make a difference.

I don't think it will be dismissed simply because of the crisis that the Church has faced. I find politicians here in the state [and] business leadership here quite interested in what I have to say. And I have to be careful that what I say is thoughtful, that what I say is not hypocritical, and that what I say has focus to it.

Continue to top of next colum
Tools:
E-Mail this article
Resources
Many parishioners here say, "We have the best bishop we could have hoped for," but that the vast number of your brethren still don't get it. Do you agree?

I was in Chicago in the 1990s when this crisis first surfaced, and I know the torture that it gave to Cardinal Bernardin. ... We have struggled, we have experienced great distress. ... As an institution, regrettably, we didn't recognize the warning signs that were apparent at that time. We didn't make it a first priority, and we didn't mobilize our energies to address it.

I think now bishops know very well the pain that has been inflicted, the mistakes that were made. I sense among our bishops a very strong, clear signal that they will not let this happen again because for many of them, as it has been for me, it's a terribly difficult situation to know how best to act. You know the pain of the victim, you know the fallen and destroyed person of the priest. You know the family pain that has been experienced, and it's all these things that come at you. Plus, you're trying to be a father, you're trying to be a brother, you're trying to be a friend. You're trying to understand, to invite conversion, and yet [you are] realizing that some of these patterns are addictive, are repetitive, so I think it was a terribly painful struggle: a desire to protect the name of the Church, because of the need to speak forcibly and with integrity, and yet the fear that further children could be harmed. So there's just such a complexity of feelings, and the issues are so subtle.

I have met priests here who have offended -- and I didn't know any of them, so I had no personal relationship with them and, in some ways, it was somewhat easier because there was no emotional attachment. I didn't ordain them. I didn't nurture them along in the priesthood. I just came in as they were being accused. But if you look at these men, they're not all the same. Some are repetitive predators -- some perhaps extremely malicious, some very frail, damaged human beings, some with one incident that they totally regret [and about] which they feel great guilt and anxiety. The gamut of priests [is] so different. You're torn with all these struggles and I think, yes, we didn't recognize the warning signs. We didn't mobilize our energies. We didn't put this as a first priority, and that was a mistake.

How can you restore the love and trust?

When trust is broken, it's extremely hard to restore it. And I think the only way you can restore it is by persistent doing of what is right. For example, to be with victims of abuse, to offer apologies [is] probably one of the most humbling experiences that I've ever experienced -- to meet with someone whose life has been shattered and to say to them, "I'm sorry, I ask your forgiveness."

How likely will the Church change and become more open?

Here in the diocese I've encouraged conversation around two issues -- structures for the involvement of the laity and structures for communication, because I think they're both critical for restoring trust.

I'm chair of the subcommittee of the bishops' conference on lay ecclesiastical ministry -- the laity who are involved in the service of the Church. And it has been a wonderful learning experience to meet so many laity, to see the gifts that they have to bring to the service of the Church. And I think we do need to find larger structures for lay involvement.

Now we have some already mandated that if we were to take them seriously, I think, would make a difference. For example, here in our diocese, we have what's called a diocesan pastoral council [DPC], which I'm impressed by. Some diocesan pastoral councils are a waste of time. They're sound and fury signifying nothing. But, I must say, the DPC here -- and much is due to our previous bishop, [Manuel] Moreno, who gave a great deal of attention and time to it -- is quite a strong consultative body. They are not hesitant to offer their opinion. They are not hesitant to offer their advice, and their advice has been very helpful.

Every parish is supposed to have a parish pastoral council, mandated by canon law. Regrettably, not all of our parishes do, and one of the pushes that I'm making is to see to it that every parish has a finance council -- some laity to help advise the pastor on the finances of the parish. The pastor has to be transparent. He has to open up for the people what their monies are being used for.

Today, you just can't ask people for contributions. You can't just ask people to support what you're doing and not explain how the money is being used. I think that's one of the struggles for laity in the crisis. Some are very angry about the legal settlements that are being made. They're upset that their monies are being used for purposes that were not their intention.

I'm very open to meeting with any lay groups that are forming to try to understand better what would be helpful and how the Church could be more transparent. I think both of those areas are going to be very critical in terms of healing -- getting laity involved and being transparent as possible.

Recently we gave a very full disclosure of the financial cost to the diocese of the crisis. Some people say we shouldn't do that. Some people say it isn't right, but people should know what this is costing the Church.

There's nothing worse than when people feel deceived, when people feel put off, when people feel not included. I think people can take very hard information if it's said to them honestly and directly. And I think that's helpful in restoring trust.

Do you think some bishops need to resign?

Some bishops have resigned, and I think every bishop has made an effort to try to make sure that the mistakes that were made in the past will not happen again. ...

It's always hard to judge another individual, and I'm certainly aware of my own limitations and judgment and decision making, so it's hard to judge without knowing all of the specifics. But, again, I think it's very important that we be careful of imputing motives to people. If, in fact, a bishop maliciously and knowingly put children at risk, I think the bishop needs to look at whether or not he can continue to function, because if a bishop is to be a father, a brother, and a friend, if one is maliciously or flagrantly violating the responsibility of a father, one has to call into question their fatherhood. But I don't think that was the situation for bishops who were in very complex situations.

Did you like this story? How can we improve our program or Web site?
Resources






TOP